I am not convinced that this is useful (yet). I have been generating
some red-link lists for the upcoming international edit-a-thon about
Art Feminism on February 1st, and I tried out this tool to see if I
could come with with lists of women artists already in other projects.
With Reasonator I
Hoi,
You are conflating two tools .. they are still quite distinct..
- What you refer to is a query tool and IT provides you with the numbers
you quote.
- Reasonator provides you with a search functionality and a display
functionality
So Reasonator gives you something like this [1]
Hoi,
As I recall it there is a category with Russian female painters.. Using
Widar [1] and identifying them as a painter and a female takes all of 5
minutes..
Thanks,
GerardM
[1] http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html
On 24 January 2014 13:40, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com
On 22 January 2014 08:35, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
There are many ways to skin a cat. The most obvious
one is to add a {{Reasonator}} template as a place
holder in a Wikipedia. Another is to capture a not
found or a red link and insert Reasonator info. What
I am
Hi Andy,
I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would be
the main attraction; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have to do
is add a blank infobox, and it should automatically fill up with the
What about having the Reasonator sit in the Draft namespace, with a
link from the search results or the text preloaded for non-existing
pages in the main namespace?
Daniel
--
http://www.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/en/institution/mitarbeiter/mietchen-daniel/
Hoi,
Having Reasonator generated content in a draft namespace is *NOT* a bad
idea.
- I do not know enough about the draft namespace.. Is there a way to
discover that an article exists in Draft ??
- My personal target for this functionality is very much the smaller
projects. By using a
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Daniel Mietchen
daniel.mietc...@googlemail.com wrote:
What about having the Reasonator sit in the Draft namespace, with a
link from the search results or the text preloaded for non-existing
pages in the main namespace?
Daniel
It is still far too early to
Hoi,
We can provide information now(ish). We are discussing draft because it is
a likely avenue. It is however very much NOT intended for the English
Wikipedia. If anything it would be much better if we work this out on other
Wikipedias first.
The most benefit from Reasonator will be for the
On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would be
the main attraction; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have to do
On 23 January 2014 15:42, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would
be
the main attraction; but if infoboxes were to fall back on
Hoi,
The mail I send is meant to be a warning in advance. If you are interested
in the Reasonator, it is in continuous development and information is
provided on an almost daily basis. When you have read it, you may
understand the potential it has. It will help you understand why it can
have a
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.comwrote:
Hoi,
At this moment Wikipedia red links provide no information whatsoever.
This is not cool.
In Wikidata we often have labels for the missing (=red link) articles. We
can and do provide information from
On a technical note, Reasonator is pure JavaScript, so should be easily
portable, even to a Wikipedia:Reasonator.js page (or several pages, with
support JS).
git here:
https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/reasonator
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan
Hoi,
Given that Reasonator requests services through Javascript, it will likely
piggy back on the Wikidata infrastructure. As caching is as far as I know
not implemented on Wikidata, it will benefit everyone when caching for
Wikidata gets on the WMF-Ops agenda.
Until now Wikidata is considered to
Can you explain how such a {{Reasonator}} template would actually work. You
say that it would be a stand-in until the article was actually written, but
how would it know when the article is actually written? Is there a way to
access the target article's state via Lua?
From a community
16 matches
Mail list logo
