Hello all,
I did a couple if simple tests on MediaWiki on Flow pages with often
occurring edits. The tests failed.
I am an admin on Commons, and I regularly have to remove an image on a talk
page because it is for example a violation of copyright. I see no way to
remove the copyright violation
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik,
One huge thing is that article talk pages are not only for discussions, but
also for metadata (article assessments, history, Wikiproject data, as
examples from the English Wikipedia). The top of the talk page also, on
On 06.09.2014 23:14, Romaine Wiki wrote:
Hello all,
I did a couple if simple tests on MediaWiki on Flow pages with often
occurring edits. The tests failed.
...
So, there is flow, and instead of the community can work with it as it
needs to work with, it does not flow but got stuck...
To
Hi,
I forgot to mention that we use a lot of template messages on talk pages to
inform users about something. In a part of these templates we automatically
add categories because we want to track the users who have problematic
behaviour. Testing this by adding a category to a message in Flow
On 6 September 2014 15:33, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Flow doesn't automatically update template output -- it retains the
output as it was when the user posted the comment. We can argue
whether that's good or bad behavior, but it's worth doing so in the
context of real examples.
2014-09-07 0:33 GMT+02:00 Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am an admin on Commons, and I regularly have to remove an image on a
talk
page because it is for example a violation of copyright. I see no way to
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote:
There is one notable exception to the above, which is talk page header
templates. One expects updates to a template used as a talk page header to
update every page the template is currently transcluded on, which is not
rik, I appreciate your engaging with this *early* enough for design
decisions to be adjusted before Flow gets to major rollouts.
Romaine, if the Dutch uses of features like templates are not being taken
into account in how features are designed, I suggest contacting the
Engineering community
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
rik, I appreciate your engaging with this *early* enough for design
decisions to be adjusted before Flow gets to major rollouts.
Romaine, if the Dutch uses of features like templates are not being taken
into account in how
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Keegan Peterzell kpeterz...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
..last July...
July 2013, for clarity.
--
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Product
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Erik Möller wrote:
It's [Flow is] a system in early development, and has never been
advertised as anything else.
==
*This statement is simply not true.*
See the WMF's 2014-15 annual plan:
https://archive.org/details/WikimediaFoundation2014-15AnnualPlan
Page 20 (DIRECT QUOTE FOLLOWS):
Tim, I read that a bit differently.
Flow is an *experimental* but already feature
rich alternative...
We will aim to cover one major set of new deployments per quarter,
*carefully picking use cases*.
This looks to me like the kind of incremental rollout that is appropriate.
The idea of users
These are just assertions, however. I liked your earlier comments
because they are testable against the architecture (even if the
current implementation, early as it is, will fail many of these
tests). What real world needs cannot be met by a comment-centric
architecture for .. commenting?
Hi all,
I'm breaking out this discussion about Flow/talk pages (apologies for
repeatedly breaking the megathread, but this is a well-scoped subject
which deserves its own thread).
Fundamentally, there's one key question to answer for talk pages in
Wikimedia projects: Do we want discussions to
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Fundamentally, there's one key question to answer for talk pages in
Wikimedia projects: Do we want discussions to occur in document mode,
or in a structured comment mode? All else flows from there snip
I think there's
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
