Leslie Carr, 14/08/2013 22:30:
http://status.wikimedia.org is from external monitors
I don't see any annual or multi-year stats there and I don't think they
monitor readon-only vs. rw state.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wiki
http://status.wikimedia.org is from external monitors
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse the brevity and typos.
On Aug 14, 2013 4:44 AM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote:
> Chris McKenna, 14/08/2013 00:00:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to think Engineering do a pr
Chris McKenna, 14/08/2013 00:00:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Oliver Keyes wrote:
I'd like to think Engineering do a pretty good job at uptime for core
services - when was the last time you saw Wikipedia down for any extended
period of time? - regardless of what day of the week it is.
Wikipedia uptim
2013/8/14 Tim Starling :
> On 14/08/13 07:40, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>> We have weekend support - for core services, which constitute our MediaWiki
>> instances. Git, however, is not a core service - as Max accurately notes,
>> while it makes development finicky and frustrating,
>
> I didn't know anyo
On 14/08/13 07:40, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> We have weekend support - for core services, which constitute our MediaWiki
> instances. Git, however, is not a core service - as Max accurately notes,
> while it makes development finicky and frustrating,
I didn't know anyone used git.wikimedia.org. I thin
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Oliver Keyes wrote:
I'd like to think Engineering do a pretty good job at uptime for core
services - when was the last time you saw Wikipedia down for any extended
period of time? - regardless of what day of the week it is.
Wikipedia uptime is certianly much better these d
A quick update I just sent to wikitech-l (where this conversation should
be happening):
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-August/071171.html
Full text below:
As you all are aware, git.wikimedia.org (powered by GitBlit) has been
unstable. The root cause is bas
We have weekend support - for core services, which constitute our MediaWiki
instances. Git, however, is not a core service - as Max accurately notes,
while it makes development finicky and frustrating, it doesn't impact on
our core mission, which is to provide the sum of human knowledge, for
everyb
I maintained 24/7 support with a team of 6. WMF has 150 staff and does
not have weekend support. The tail is wagging the dog.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikim
Huib Laurens wrote:
>I always believed that our servers were monitored 24/7? But nobody seems
>to be around to fix a core part in our systems?
Hi Huib.
You've been around quite a long time, so it shouldn't be new information
to you that the appropriate mailing list for an issue like this is
wikit
Huib Laurens, 10/08/2013 17:31:
I always believed that our servers where monitored 24/7?
Not magically, despite the amount of unicorns bought by the WMF. You're
looking for https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51983
But nobody seems
to be arround to fix a core part in our systems?
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Huib Laurens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I always believed that our servers where monitored 24/7? But nobody seems
> to be arround to fix a core part in our systems?
>
> Huib
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: rupert THURNER
> Date: Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at
12 matches
Mail list logo
