Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hear, hear Thanks, GerardM Op 18 jun. 2013 12:08 schreef "Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada" het volgende: > Seriously, are we discussing again about bot stubs yes, bot stubs no? > > Those users who want to submit complete 10-page articles, can move to the > defunct Nupedia or the 'vibrant' Citize

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Balázs Viczián
WMHU had issues with the manual version of mass copying. One of the most known, highly active and trusted user (at that time already an admin) of WMHU, on the project for five years (from 2005) as of the date it was revealed in 2010, have copied over half of his 11.000+ articles that he created ov

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
Seriously, are we discussing again about bot stubs yes, bot stubs no? Those users who want to submit complete 10-page articles, can move to the defunct Nupedia or the 'vibrant' Citizendium. This eternal discussion is so boring. 2013/6/18 Lydia Pintscher > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Niko

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Nikola Smolenski wrote: > On 18/06/13 01:04, Martin Rulsch wrote: >> >> As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team. > > > It isn't exactly planned by the Wikidata tema, a volunteer would need to do > it. What exactly are you talking about being pla

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Nikola Smolenski
On 18/06/13 01:04, Martin Rulsch wrote: As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team. It isn't exactly planned by the Wikidata tema, a volunteer would need to do it. 2013/6/18 Ziko van Dijk Hello, I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also some remarks that good

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-17 Thread Martin Rulsch
As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team. Cheers Martin 2013/6/18 Ziko van Dijk > Hello, > I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also some remarks that > good be understood as a criticism of the German Wikipedia editing > community. Actually, both opinions coexist

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-17 Thread Ziko van Dijk
Hello, I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also some remarks that good be understood as a criticism of the German Wikipedia editing community. Actually, both opinions coexist also in de.WP, although the anti bot faction is obviously stronger. My concern is that bot articles usually st

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-17 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
Hi! Sad for seeing you so disappointed. Good to see you have insight in butterflies. So I hope you will make your knowledge visible on dewp, where neither genera so far have found its way into articles. enwp (together with viwp!) has at least the genus "Jameela" as an article. That aside, i

[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-17 Thread Kurt Kulac
Am 17.06.2013 16:01, schrieb Jan Ainali: 2013/6/17 Ilario Valdelli One of the strategic goal of the plan of wikimedia movement is the quality. That is true. However, the strategic plan does not go into detail on how to measure it. Is it an article that only has claims backed by sources? If