On 15 June 2014 02:57, Deryck Chan deryckc...@gmail.com wrote:
Just make a RepRap ourselves. Materials typically cost ~£300-400 these days.
http://www.reprap.org/wiki/RepRap
The 3D printer itself is libre hardware and is capable of manufacturing most
parts of itself!
RepRap looks like a
All,
I'm talking to the initial proposer (Nonlineartom) at the moment. He has a
fair bit of experience with this sort of thing.
I will have a proper look next week when I'm back at work, but this should
be something we could do relatively cheaply.
On 15 Jun 2014 11:25, John Cummings
All:
In other Wikimedia-related forums, recent discussions have focused on some
(alleged) comments at the Wiki Conference in New York. Apparently, some
people suggested that the WMF's Executive Director should dump her
significant other.[1] Many have expressed outrage about this. (For
background,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com
wrote:
All:
In other Wikimedia-related forums, recent discussions have focused on some
(alleged) comments at the Wiki Conference in New York. Apparently, some
people suggested that the WMF's Executive Director should dump
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we all share a concern about the amount of drama in our
community-wide discussions. Expressing outrage (even though it's sometimes
appropriate and necessary) can often be the fuel of drama -- and I think
it's
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you sum up what you're trying to accomplish in one sentence
Well, fairly close to one sentence:
English Wikipedia is seeing a shift in how many longtime banned users are
regarded, commanding substantial valuable
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com wrote:
it doesn't explain what you want.
For that part, read this again, which you misinterpreted. Parentheses to
clarify, this time:
I don't think it's a good idea to [ignore (this apparently escalating
situation) on this email
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are the ethical principles I think you're espousing:
I don't think you read my message very carefully.
1) Vicious, hurtful gossip and speculation about a female executive's
private personal life is acceptable
No,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I have not recapped the whole situation. What I think is appropriate is
that we find a way to bring the situation to a calm conclusion of some
Hi,
I'm puzzled of those emails. Especially melting organisational discussions
and private issues.
Who sleeps with whom is of no importance actually. What you seem to
describe is someone using a personal relationship with a leader of our
movement to push forward its POV.
This asks for an
Christophe, Wil tried to open issues closed few years ago. Besides that,
not under ED mandate.
Everything else in his behavior was behavioral problem, not substantial one.
Thus, quite irrelevant. Just if Lila opens the same questions -- and I am
sure they are far from her focus -- that would
On 15 June 2014 19:13, Christophe Henner christophe.hen...@gmail.com wrote:
From my point of view, french wikimedian, all I saw is some drama around
specific topics that stopped days ago. As far as I know, the crisis isn't
going further than that. And what your email, sofar, is doing, is
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Christophe Henner
christophe.hen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm puzzled of those emails.
Christophe, thank you for explaining how this looks from your end. I
understand now why this would come across this way, and will put together a
more focused summary like
Hoi,
Please don't
Thanks,
GerardM
On 15 June 2014 21:19, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Christophe Henner
christophe.hen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm puzzled of those emails.
Christophe, thank you for explaining how this looks from
On 15/06/2014 20:08, Milos Rancic wrote:
Christophe, Wil tried to open issues closed few years ago. Besides that,
not under ED mandate.
In what sense were these issues 'closed'? 'Closed' usually means
'resolved'. As far as I know, they were not resolved.
On Jun 15, 2014 10:07 PM, edward edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
On 15/06/2014 20:08, Milos Rancic wrote:
Christophe, Wil tried to open issues closed few years ago. Besides that,
not under ED mandate.
In what sense were these issues 'closed'? 'Closed' usually means
'resolved'. As far as I
On 15/06/2014 20:19, Pete Forsyth wrote:
Since this seems to be the most heated issue at the moment, I want to point
out: I am not the one who made these allegedly nasty comments public; the
person who made them public, and then proceeded to discuss them in numerous
public forums, was Wil
Interesting, and nice publicity with an Education Minister.
It mentions History and Geography as topics.Does this mean a similar project is
needed in Palestine to maintain neutrality?
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:01:11 +0200
From: ps.hu...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:19 PM, edward edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
If making them public is the problem, then the aggressor and one of the
victims are one and the same person.
You are saying that Sinclair is the aggressor here?
Not at all -- you'll note that my statement, quoted above,
Hi Yves,
The Wikimedia Foundation runs a project called the Arab World Education
Program that I hear is successful. You can read about it on the Wikimedia
Blog and in the This Month in Education newsletter. I haven't heard of an
Arab country providing a national-level endorsement to the program
On 15/06/2014 22:33, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:19 PM, edward edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
If making them public is the problem, then the aggressor and one of the
victims are one and the same person.
You are saying that Sinclair is the aggressor here?
Not at all --
I'm sorry to say that my reading of your postings to this list in the past
24 hours is that you are making numerous personal attacks and insinuating
yourself into the personal lives of individuals.
I ask you to stop this line of discussion entirely; if you do not do so, I
ask the moderators of
This Month in Education
https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education/Newsletter is a monthly
newsletter documenting recent happenings within the Wikimedia education
community. Learn more about Wikipedia in Education at
education.wikimedia.org.
--
*This Month In
23 matches
Mail list logo
