Moving on, and bringing it back to what is important, Steven, can you
please address the questions which have been asked of you.
Cheers
Scotty
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Steven Zhang steven.zh...@wikimedia.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Just to confirm, this was a deliberate removal and
Steven's answer looked complete and apposite to me.
On 17 March 2014 12:49, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Moving on, and bringing it back to what is important, Steven, can you please
address the questions which have been asked of you.
Cheers
Scotty
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014
Actually, he hasn't answered ANY questions that have been asked of him,
either by myself, nor by Tony.
His killing Tony's subscription because Tony has valid questions in
relation to Andrew Owens' position on the Committee seems like a bit of a
cover up, and a stupid attempt to silence a person
The questions have been answered previously but for clarity
Tony wasnt blocked for asking about Andrew that is a question raised just a
day ago, Tony was blocked for repeatably not respecting
Wikiquettehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Etiquette,
making personal
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:45 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, kicking people off the list in such circumstances has generally
been acceptable on Wikimedia lists, with or without notice. Though
notice is nice and adds to transparency.
Really? You guys have banned regular
None of my questions have been answered by the committee (or by David
Gerard, who seems to think it's worth it to chime in without
evidence)
The critical questions are where I have been uncivil, repeatably not
respectingWikiquette, or making personal attacks, according to
Gideon (Gnangarra). That
