Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Michelle Gallaway
I don't want to shit on what is otherwise a great idea, but wasn't the AGM in November? Does it really take two months to get to know one another? What has (or has not) been going on in that time? On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Brianna Laugher brianna.laug...@gmail.comwrote: Hello members

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Brianna Laugher
2010/1/20 Michelle Gallaway mgalla...@gmail.com: I don't want to shit on what is otherwise a great idea, but wasn't the AGM in November?  Does it really take two months to get to know one another?  What has (or has not) been going on in that time? Hi Michelle, I realise the committee has not

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Sarah Ewart
Michelle, from my own point of view, I really don't see it as a get to know each other thing and if that is what I considered the meeting to be, I wouldn't bother giving up a whole weekend and traveling to Melbourne, and I really doubt I'm the only one who would feel that way. There's a number of

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Sarah Ewart
Plus, the make up of the current committee is very similar to last year's committee. Brian, Brianna, Liam and myself were on last year's committee and Andrew was an observer. The only truly new member is Steve. Brian, Brianna and Liam attended the face to face meetup last year and I attended one

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread private musings
would you be up for posting the agenda ahead of time on the wiki - maybe it'd be interesting to get comments on some of the issues? I'm genuinely curious (with a smile!) as to what they may be :-) ps. (for brianna really, I guess) - I don't know if there's anything you can do about it, but I

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Craig Franklin
I have to endorse this - while email and messaging and stuff are of course a handy way to discuss issues, nothing has yet been invented that beats an old-fashioned face to face conversation for making process on issues and getting stuff done. This is a great use of the committee's time, and I

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Sarah Ewart
Just any issues the committee may discuss which might require fuller discussion rather than the kind of discussion you get from emails and irc. Our minutes are transparent and open as to the matters we discuss and which items we feel need further investigation and consideration and discussion, so

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Sarah Ewart
(By the way, I’m sure the Brisbane community would love to welcome you all up here next time ;-) ) I for one would love this, but it probably wont happen until we get some Queenslanders on the committee. Of course, that's not my motivation in urging all QLD members to stand for a seat on the

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread private musings
ah, but fear ye not! - You can reassign votes at any time (I figured out how to, so it must be easy ;-) - I think it's probably a good idea to 'vote early, vote often' - particularly because it might help keep momentum in other folk using the system? either ways - be sure to vote big points for an

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Brianna Laugher
2010/1/21 Craig Franklin cr...@halo-17.net: Getting back to the original topic of this post, is there an end-date for the Ideascale thing?  Don't want to blow my 50 gold stars on early ideas, only for even better ideas to come up later. Well we are meeting on the 30th, so this week rather than

Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Brainstorming for 2010

2010-01-20 Thread Andrew
Agreed with Sarah's and Brianna's comments generally. I see it as a strategy and planning meeting - in essence, trying to get our priorities sorted out, and that's something which can go on forever by email, but in person with a set time available can be extremely productive. I'm coming over from