Hi,
//Well, salaries upto 2 lakh _per month_ with additional allowances for
expenses on domestic and international travel is pretty huge for India.
Reading from
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WMF-A2K_Grant_Budget_and_Utilization_Sept12_-Feb13.pdf//
So what? An employee working for the
On 9 November 2013 13:58, Ravishankar ravidre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
//Well, salaries upto 2 lakh _per month_ with additional allowances for
expenses on domestic and international travel is pretty huge for India.
Reading from
On 9 November 2013 19:21, Hari Prasad Nadig hpna...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think it is appropriate to compare Wikimedia Foundation or its
functioning in India to profit making companies and BPOs?
Yes. The goals might be different but they both require qualified,
high quality people to make
Indeed, paying more salary is “one” way of making that possible.
To me, it is more than a technical decision. Going for (in my opinion) such a
high salary reflects a “choice” by the decision-makers to adopt this particular
way of achieving the goals. Now, this is for me in complete contrast to
On 9 November 2013 23:38, Prashanth Nuggehalli Srinivas
prashanth...@gmail.com wrote:
contribution in the community. If at all, it should inspire it more. And
paying this kind of salaries is certainly not in line with the way the
community has been evolving.
In general, we seem to be fixated
Well. I agree with this. But, I think there is an additional argument, beyond
accountability to outputs, which is the culture-maintaining spirit of the
movement. I think there is something to be said of that.
On 09-Nov-2013, at 7:11 pm, Gautam John gau...@akshara.org.in wrote:
Why not measure
On 9 November 2013 23:44, Prashanth Nuggehalli Srinivas
prashanth...@gmail.com wrote:
Well. I agree with this. But, I think there is an additional argument,
beyond accountability to outputs, which is the culture-maintaining spirit of
the movement. I think there is something to be said of that.
+1 Shyamal
It certainly makes the volunteers to draw a line on what they could
volunteer easily and leaves the rest to them (and i have implied
earlier about their abilities) and i afraid it's getting worse day by
day. A2K might reach to thousands of people, but it is not going to
help retain
On 1 November 2013 09:17, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dear Shyamal, and everyone,
I apologize for not responding in a timely manner to your question on the
Wikimedia Forum[1]. Since that thread is now archived, and because I don't
want to bury my respond, I'm responding here,
On 6 November 2013 18:08, Hari Prasad Nadig hpna...@gmail.com wrote:
Starting from the earlier program director, the salaries allotted were mind
bogglingly huge when compared to the salary trends in the non-profits here
in India.
In general, salaries at non-profits in India are staggeringly
One of the reasons I personally would want to push for more visibility on
the agreement terms is the spending that is being done on the salaries of
the people involved in the Indian program. There's not much disclosure on
these if I'm not mistaken. Or point me to it if there's any.
Dear
On 6 November 2013 18:31, Gautam John gau...@akshara.org.in wrote:
On 6 November 2013 18:08, Hari Prasad Nadig hpna...@gmail.com wrote:
Starting from the earlier program director, the salaries allotted were
mind
bogglingly huge when compared to the salary trends in the non-profits
here
Vishnu,
The salaries of the earlier program director wasn't disclosed. There's not
been much visibility there.
Thanks for the links though.
On 6 November 2013 19:11, Vishnu T visdav...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the reasons I personally would want to push for more visibility on
the agreement
13 matches
Mail list logo
