Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-25 Thread Gordon Joly

It's REALLY EASY for a charity to end up with boxes of T-shirts under the bed.

I second that!


http://www.flickr.com/photos/loopzilla/72034640/



Gordo


-- 
Think Feynman/
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
gordon.j...@pobox.com///

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/9/14 WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@googlemail.com:
 I'm not a fan of merchandising as part of a charities function. But if
 it is done it should have the saving grace of having a sufficient
 markup to help finance the organisation.

It's not a matter of being a fan or not - merchandising is not part of
our function, it can only legally be done for the purposes of raising
funds. Raising funds by attracting more members is a possibility, but
I'm sceptical that it would raise enough funds to be worth the risk of
unsold stock. If there is significant risk (which, without a profit
margin to help absorb losses, there would be) then it would have to be
done through a trading subsidiary, anyway (without the risk it would
fall under the small trading exemption so could be done directly), and
that will incur admin costs.

 Now what would be cool would be Wikipedia calenders. Flowers, sports
 events historical events - we could theme quite a few and they'd make
 great gifts. It would also be a good article improvement process as
 the nominated articles for the calender would be liable to get good
 scrutiny and input whist we discuss which should go in the calender.
 OK we would need wmf agreement to do this as a fundraiser sold outside
 the membership, but there is a well established charity market for
 such things. I for one can think of half a dozen calenders that I
 might buy  as winter solstice presents for assorted friends and
 relatives.

Now, that is a fantastic idea! They would be very cheap to produce (in
terms of money - lots of volunteer labour would be required) so could
be sold cheaply while still having a decent profit margin. It would be
a great way to advertise (extracts from) featured articles - showing
off our best articles could do a lot of good.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread David Gerard
2009/9/14 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
 2009/9/14 WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@googlemail.com:

 I'm not a fan of merchandising as part of a charities function. But if
 it is done it should have the saving grace of having a sufficient
 markup to help finance the organisation.

 It's not a matter of being a fan or not - merchandising is not part of
 our function, it can only legally be done for the purposes of raising
 funds. Raising funds by attracting more members is a possibility, but
 I'm sceptical that it would raise enough funds to be worth the risk of
 unsold stock. If there is significant risk (which, without a profit
 margin to help absorb losses, there would be) then it would have to be
 done through a trading subsidiary, anyway (without the risk it would
 fall under the small trading exemption so could be done directly), and
 that will incur admin costs.


It's REALLY EASY for a charity to end up with boxes of T-shirts under the bed.

The conditions WMF have put on merchandise, as described here, sound
basically onerous and no different to no, you can't do it at all.


- d.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread Andrew Turvey
Thanks everyone for their responses. Back to the original questions:

- what kind of thing would you, personally, be interested in buying or
getting as a gift? Tshirts, mousemats, cufflinks?
- how much would you be willing to spend?
- what logos would you like? Wikipedia? WMUK, complete family?

Discussions so far have focussed on very limited sales, order on
demand only. No one wants to spend lots of effort doing this, or
taking any significant levels of stock. I don't think it has any
potential to be a major source of funding so I don't suggest we go
down that route.

We're an association, a group of people with a common interest. The
best way to encourage more and more people to join is to generate an
enthusiasm for what we have in common. Stuff like Wikipedia T-shirts
have a great potential to do that. Please don't pile in to rubbish the
idea before it even takes shape.

Andrew

On Sep 13, 11:04 pm, Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com
wrote:
 We've received approval from the Wikimedia Foundation to produce 
 merchandising with Wikimedia trademarks and copyrighted logos on it for sale 
 to our members - anything from mugs and mouse-mats to cufflinks and ties. The 
 plan is to sell them at cost price to members only.

 Quick question - what kind of thing would you be interested in buying and 
 which logos would you want to use (Wikipedia globe? Wikimedia? Wiktionery? 
 Complete family? [1])

 [1]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_logo_family_complete...

 Please let me know either by personal reply or just reply to the list.

 Regards,

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.orghttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK:http://uk.wikimedia.org

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread Andrew Turvey
The main monetary benefits of charity status are being able to reclaim
Gift Aid on donations and reduced rates on expenses like room hire and
paypal fees. These are far larger than any profit on T-shirt sales
would ever be.

Andrew

On Sep 14, 9:34 am, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
 At 23:40 +0100 13/9/09, Andrew Turvey wrote:

 Hopefully it will be the kind of perk that will attract people who
 are already active in the projects to become members. As to selling
 at above cost, the Foundation wasn't too keen on that - worried that
 we would develop into some kind of commercial arm of the Foundation,
 which is not really their idea of the role of chapters.

 Andrew

 Run that by me, one more time?

 Why then seek to gain a tax advantage?

 Gordo

 --
 Think Feynman/http://pobox.com/~gordo/
 gordon.j...@pobox.com///

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.orghttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK:http://uk.wikimedia.org

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread Andrew Turvey
Re-reading my original email and the reaction to it I should clarify: 

- Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com wrote: 
 The plan is to sell them at cost price to members only. 

Cost price isn't a restriction from the Foundation - their main restriction 
is that it must be either sold only to members or given away for free as 
publicity. It's up to us what price we sell them at, although if we make 
significant profit margins there are certain tax and charity consequences which 
may be better avoiding. Also I don't want members to get the impression we're 
profiteering. Thinking about it again, cost+20% - which I understand is what 
cafepress do - sounds about right to cover waste, stock etc. 

As I've mentioned before, I don't think the potential volumes justify turning 
this into a fundraising business. However, I do think it could be a good way to 
attract new members and give a benefit to existing members. 

I love the idea of a calendar, and we already have a potential partner in this 
with Robbies Photographics - one of the sponsors of the Wikipedia Loves Art 
event. 

Andrew 


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/9/14 Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com:
 Discussions so far have focussed on very limited sales, order on
 demand only. No one wants to spend lots of effort doing this, or
 taking any significant levels of stock. I don't think it has any
 potential to be a major source of funding so I don't suggest we go
 down that route.

The final sale price would probably be lower if we bought a
significant number and added a profit margin.

 We're an association, a group of people with a common interest. The
 best way to encourage more and more people to join is to generate an
 enthusiasm for what we have in common. Stuff like Wikipedia T-shirts
 have a great potential to do that. Please don't pile in to rubbish the
 idea before it even takes shape.

I'll rubbish whatever ideas I want, thank you very much! I'm not
convinced this will attract sufficient members to justify doing it. It
doesn't further our charitable goals so if it doesn't raise
significant funds, we can't do it. By all means, do some market
research and find out for sure, but I think merchandising for profit
is the way to go.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/9/14 Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com:
 Re-reading my original email and the reaction to it I should clarify:

 - Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com wrote:
  The plan is to sell them at cost price to members only.

 Cost price isn't a restriction from the Foundation - their main
 restriction is that it must be either sold only to members or given away for
 free as publicity. It's up to us what price we sell them at, although if we
 make significant profit margins there are certain tax and charity
 consequences which may be better avoiding. Also I don't want members to get
 the impression we're profiteering. Thinking about it again, cost+20% - which
 I understand is what cafepress do - sounds about right to cover waste, stock
 etc.

Ok, that's better, now we're talking (20% sounds fine to me, 10% might
even be enough - depends on the details). The tax thresholds are in
terms of turnover, rather than profit. For a small charity the small
trade exemption covers us up to £5000 pa. turnover. If we go over that
(which is unlikely with t-shirts and things, although the calendar
idea could be bigger), we can avoid paying tax by forming a trading
subsidiary and having it donate the profits to the charity, it then
giftaids them so they are tax deductible reducing taxable profits to
zero. (This is all entirely legal, the HMRC website even says how to
do it.)

I don't think t-shirts will be a large fundraiser, but we have to call
it a fundraiser in order for it to be legal.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-14 Thread David Gerard
2009/9/14 Jarry1250 jarry1...@googlemail.com:

 I agree. The only thing is to add really is that branded T-Shirts might
 be good for WMUK people to wear at (informal) events where they
 represent the friendly face of Wikipedia.


Indeed. I actually need to get around to making a homemade Wikipedia
shirt or two I can keep on hand for telly etc!

(Inkjet-printable T-shirt transfers. Great stuff. Suitable to be worn
once or twice, not really washable without *ridiculous* care. Probably
worth spending a little more and getting a one-off done at a high
street print shop.)


- d.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Merchandising

2009-09-13 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/9/13 Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com:
 We've received approval from the Wikimedia Foundation to produce 
 merchandising with Wikimedia trademarks and copyrighted logos on it for sale 
 to our members - anything from mugs and mouse-mats to cufflinks and ties. The 
 plan is to sell them at cost price to members only.

Cost price? What is the point of that? Merchandising is a great way of
making money. I don't think the existence of members-only merchandise
is going to get many extra people to sign up. I would be happy to pay
a little extra for my WMUK t-shirts.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org