In the longer term we are working on the ability to store HTML
instead for new wikis, in which case it might become possible to
run without Parsoid if you don't need a wikitext editor front-end.
This is not going to happen over night and will just be an option,
so no reason to worry.
So
Am 16.02.2014 10:32, schrieb David Gerard:
There are extensions that allow raw HTML widgets, just putting them
through unchecked.
I know, I wrote one :) But that's not the point. The point is maintaining
editable content as HTML instead of Wikitext.
The hard part will be checking.
Wikitext
Hoi,
There has been a lot of controversy about language support. Some of the
arguments used indicate a lack of understanding what it is language support
does. In my opinion language support is a primary requirement of MediaWiki.
MediaWiki supports languages really well.
In a blog post [1] I have
Hi
Understanding how to contribute in MediaWiki is essential to new bees. Here
is the MediaWiki page : https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_contribute
I found very interesting thing for Mozilla :
http://www.whatcanidoformozilla.org/
This is very useful stuff with localised in many languages.
Are you simply looking for gsoc mentors?
I wanted to discuss about the idea and very much interested to take this
further. And if the idea seems to be feasible and technically implementable
then I would like to work on this project for GSoc 2014 and would need a
mentor who can guide/help me to
Hoy all,
I've been meaning to start a thread about this for a while, but just hadn't
gotten around to it. Things have been rather heated the past few days, so I
figured now would be as good a time as any to go about starting this thread.
Have any of you ever heard of Non-Violent Communication
On 16 feb. 2014, at 09:13, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On webfonts: it's not just that it would take more research. We have
already tried webfonts and failed miserably so far.
UniversalLanguageSelector is an example of how even the most
well-intentioned efforts in this area
On 02/17/2014 02:45 PM, Derric Atzrott wrote:
NVC values honestly expressing your own needs and feeling and empathetically
listening to those of others.
You know, I'm generally considered to be reasonably skilled at
communications; and I think that I have had some success in remaining
cordial
NVC values honestly expressing your own needs and feeling and empathetically
listening to those of others.
You know, I'm generally considered to be reasonably skilled at
communications; and I think that I have had some success in remaining
cordial and attentive to both my colleagues and the
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
There is one area where ULS made true mistakes and that is thinking that
it can always do better than the operating system/user. And that is the
same risk that this exercise is running into. Thinking that
+1
When I read certain threads on this list, I feel like the assume good faith
principle is often forgotten.
Because this behavior makes me not want to participate in discussions about
issues I actually care about, I wonder how many other voices, like mine, aren't
heard, and to what degree
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org wrote:
quote name=Federico Leva (Nemo) date=2014-02-15 time=22:52:31 +0100
And surely, before WMF/MediaWiki tell the world that no free fonts
of good quality exist, there will be some document detailing exactly
why and
I basically agree with everything Marc said, but you bring up a very
good point about assuming good faith. That seems like something that
would probably go the furthest towards addressing the underlying
problem. Can I tape you two together?
-I
On 17/02/14 20:45, Monte Hurd wrote:
+1
When I
On 17 feb. 2014, at 21:49, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Note that there was a small update to the feature on Friday, which removed
the max-width restriction and tweaked some padding. I'd encourage anyone
who hasn't tried the beta feature in a few weeks to give it another
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
There was also a small addition to that feature, which concerns the ToC
styling, which has had NO time to garner feedback yet, so I think
postponing is a good idea. Also a good pass of the feedback page
- Original Message -
From: Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com
Have any of you ever heard of Non-Violent Communication (NVC).
No, but I don't think it's an optimal choice of name. In my view, it's
accusing of a malevolent motivation people who are not you, who may not
*hold*
On 17 feb. 2014, at 21:45, Monte Hurd mh...@wikimedia.org wrote:
+1
When I read certain threads on this list, I feel like the assume good faith
principle is often forgotten.
Because this behavior makes me not want to participate in discussions about
issues I actually care about, I
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Steven Walling
steven.wall...@gmail.comwrote:
Sacrificing the readability and beauty of content for
most users because there is no universally perfect solution is the kind of
hard-line approach that limits the reach of FOSS, and ultimately undermines
our
I took a closer look at Linux Libertine for possible use as a webfont for
headers. Linux Libertine is a classic serif font that would match the
character of the site (i.e. it looks encylopedic). It has a wide
character coverage (over 2000 characters) and support for most ligatures.
It even has its
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
tl;dr: His stack still lists HelveticaNeue as the first font, but proposes
Arimo as a web font which may well look better on MS Windows. Arimo ships
with ChromeOS.
So, what would be the downside of listing a font like
Rob,
I think you should cross-post all or most of that on Talk:Typography
Refresh, since not all the designers are actually on Wikitech. A few
thoughts of my own...
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This doesn't seem like a satisfying leap forward, given
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
So, what would be the downside of listing a font like Arimo for
sans-serif and Libertine for serif first in the stack? While not
affecting the reader experience for a significant number of users, it
would still be a
Interesting...
I have very little authority to stand on, but in my exposure to so-called
NVC, it seems more appropriate for diplomatic negotiations than for any
real-life human situation. IMO this approach boils down to getting your
way without looking like a dick. Creeps me out.
That said,
If you're pissed, that's when you use something like NVC, except taking
it even further, perhaps. Put other people on edge too, but then if they
do anything about it, wll...
I think this may be the standard approach on a lot of discussion boards
on enwp.
On 18/02/14 03:26, Adam Wight
The latest Snowden docs have some great screenshots of the NSA-internal
MediaWiki installation Snowden is alleged to have obtained a lot of his
material from:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We basically tried the equivalent of this (placing relatively free fonts
unknown on most platforms first) which Kaldari talked about previously.
Ultimately that kind of declaration is useless for the vast majority of
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
So, what would be the downside of listing a font like Arimo for
sans-serif and Libertine for serif first in the stack? While not
affecting
On 2/18/14, Philip Neustrom phi...@localwiki.org wrote:
The latest Snowden docs have some great screenshots of the NSA-internal
MediaWiki installation Snowden is alleged to have obtained a lot of his
material from:
On 18 February 2014 07:45, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its safe to say, that if the NSA wanted to design a secure ACL
system for MediaWiki, they are more than capable of doing so. (That
said, they also know enough that a system like mediawiki is
inappropriate for keeping data
29 matches
Mail list logo
