Hi folks,
I would like to notify you that based on discussion between huggle
developers, we created a new mailing list hug...@lists.wikimedia.org.
It's for people who seek help or support for huggle, tool which is being
used on a number of wikimedia projects and for developer talk, important
chan
the session and publish
> somewhere?
>
> It would be much appreciated because I would not be able to be there,
> while I am interested in it very much.
>
> Best,
> Yusuke
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Petr Bena wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It
That is actually me, thank you
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Bergi wrote:
> Yusuke Matsubara schrieb:
>
>> [IRC]
>>>
>>
>> Could anyone prepare a summary and/or log of the session and publish
>> somewhere?
>>
>
> Logs are usually available at http://bots.wmflabs.org/~**
> petrb/logs/%23wikime
Hi folks,
we have had some discussion with other devs of huggle and I have a
question, what is the best location to host wikimedia related projects?
Documentation / web pages (preferably a wiki), I guess most suitable is mww
but that one should be for mediawiki only or not? I am talking about
proj
ta de 20 februarie 2012, 12:55, Petr Bena a
> scris:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > we have had some discussion with other devs of huggle and I have a
> > question, what is the best location to host wikimedia related projects?
> > Documentation / web pages (preferably a wiki), I
I think that it would only make logbot more complicated, it's being used
for a long time, since there were almost no troubles with trolls and it's
being logged to wiki, where it can be easily removed, I don't think it's
worth of that work, also keep in mind we use same bot in labs, and we would
nee
In this case I am talking about sw related to wmf projects, so it needs
hack in order to make it work on other wikis, however I support one wiki,
so doesn't matter where it should be, but we should have all tools on one
place, splitting wmf to meta and general to other wikis would not help much.
O
hello I have made an utility which give you all absolute URL's for a give
list / category of files on commons, in case you were interested in that, I
could send you a source code, however it just download a wiki page for each
file and parse the url from the source
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:09 PM,
he image folder is
> outside the servers doc-root for example?
>
> Johannes
>
> Am 24.02.12 15:13, schrieb Petr Bena:
>
>> hello I have made an utility which give you all absolute URL's for a give
>> list / category of files on commons, in case you were interested
This page seems to be absolutely pointless and also incorrect, since the
production is managed by operation team which contains a lot of people who
aren't on this list. Actually I don't even know why do we need to have such
a list somewhere on meta, they should be located on same page together with
Right, but the page says: don't contact people on this page, go to irc. So
question is if having such a list really help the users who seek help.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> > This page seems to be absolutely
Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> > Right, but the page says: don't contact people on this page, go to irc.
> So
> > question is if having such a list really help the users who seek help.
> >
>
> Yes, but at least you have an idea of who to look for
This depends on what you consider a first picture of a page, wheter it's a
picture not transluded from a template and also if it's a picture on top of
the page (layout) or first picture in wikipage source, in the case that
it's first picture in wikisource, what you need to call
api.php?action=query
Hey, I spoke with some folks from enwp and they said that it would be cool
if moodbar extension had one more permission allowing people to do hide /
unhide, so that they could eventually let more people than sysops check the
responses and eventually hide them. It's simple tweak, but what do you
thi
Right, I checked only its mediawiki extension wikipage it doesn't tell
about this permission, I will inform them about it, cool
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Petr Bena wrote:
> > Hey, I spoke with some folks from enwp and they said
Probably files could be useful, but most of them are now at commons, so not
sure about it
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Ariel T. Glenn wrote:
> A while back (over 2 years ago, urk!) we had a request for dumps of
> titles of things other than articles [1]. I haven't seen that request
> repeate
pageviews? Pageviews by those who are not
> logged in at the time of viewing?
>
> Risker/Anne
>
> On 2 November 2011 12:43, Petr Bena wrote:
>
> > Right, I checked only its mediawiki extension wikipage it doesn't tell
> > about this permission, I will inform them about i
he number of times [[Special:FeedbackDashboard]] is viewed;
> thanks for asking me to clarify.
>
> Risker/Anne
>
> On 2 November 2011 18:05, Petr Bena wrote:
>
> > That's something what I'd like to improve too there should be an option
> to
> > fill in th
w this). And if it's only informational for all users, it
would probably needed to be implemented to the extension.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> I don't see it in current trunk, althought it's possible that some
> internal mediawiki page views tra
Hi, I have noticed that on http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git_conversion is
that
*Not done* Commits via IRC
I don't know if you want to use bots like CIA, but if you would like to use
more customized output of bot feed, I could volunteer here, I have some
years of experience with irc bots, even a p
M, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Petr Bena wrote:
> > Hi, I have noticed that on http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git_conversionis
> > that
> > *Not done* Commits via IRC
> >
> > I don't know if you want to use bots like CIA, but if you
I am little bit new to this but when you do that would it mean that mw
wouldn't run on that or it would only show a warning to user that their php
is older than required, which user could skip? if there was that
possiblity, I see no problem with that. php is freeware so upgrade
shouldn't be problem
right, if I understand this, the problem is only with installer, so
wouldn't it be better just to make some workaround for older versions of
php for installer rather than forcing user to upgrade, while it actually
doesn't have effect on mediawiki which is already installed and working?
On Thu, No
since it
affects only installation process). At least some light weight installer
which would only update db schema and generated config file.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:18 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Petr Bena wrote:
> > php is freeware so upgrade shouldn't be problem for anyone
>
&g
Hi,
We discussed a bit yesterday in #mediawiki some features of toolserver and
their availability on labs in the future, I know that wikimedia labs are
still not being used for application hosting (wikipedia bots etc.) so I
think that it would be cool to expand this discussion also to this mailing
Hi folks,
I got some quick review from Bawolff for the extension OnlineStatusBar I've
been working on past weeks, the extension is allowing users to display
their online status on user pages and have some support on english
wikipedia for its deployment there, since it wasn't reviewed for deploymen
Yes it already works automatically that's what the extension is about, just
the menu for switching of status (busy / away) is missing. Now it
automatically flag you offline after 60 minutes (it's configurable in LS),
and as away after 20 minutes of inactivity. Thanks for reply!
On Sat, Nov 26, 201
Implemented, thanks :)
now it's a user option so that everyone can define time when they are away,
however offline is only configurable by system admin, so that users can't
misuse it to fake online status
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Now it automatically fla
Hey!
I have started Developer hub on meta [1] - it's page for developers
(not only php) who are looking for some project they can participate
on, I am myself a developer of huggle (utility used on wikipedia for
reverting vandalism, written in c#) and it's really hard to look for
more devs who coul
That is great! I was thinking of something like "tool requests" page
where people could discuss and request tools and other software, which
is actually something similar to this. I agree we should connect it
somehow.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:45 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Petr Bena wro
I guess there is not, but you are welcome to improve mentioned pages!
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Yuvi Panda wrote:
> Should there be a place for 'Extensions Wanted' as well? Does one already
> exist?
>
> --
> Yuvi Panda T
> http://yuvi.in/blog
>
> ___
Hi,
The difference is that current hub was only for developers of
mediawiki, this one is for everything including tools, bots and
various tech stuff related to wikimedia projects
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Gregory Varnum wrote:
> I'm curious about what the difference between this new hub
Right if you got no problem moving all c#, python and such stuff to
mediawiki site, no problem :) I created in on meta to avoid people
telling me: don't add stuff which got nothing to do with mediawiki
development here!
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Platonides wrote:
> On 04/12/11 11:
Hi, maybe it would be cool if you inserted some informations about
possibility to participate on development of other wikimedia projects
too, as we already mentioned on meta hub thread or at least in form of
see also.
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Yuvi Panda wrote:
> The current page[1]
Hi,
I have already noted that I work on extension which allows displaying
of user online status, see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32128, Krinkle come
with idea that it could use ajax on user pages for status bar in order
to avoid cache issues while keep performance of interface (
operly on page.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have already noted that I work on extension which allows displaying
>> of user online status, see
>> https://bugzilla.wikime
Hi Leslie,
I don't think it's necessary there, even if it was required by php5
package it would be installed anyway, question is if it would help
your issue, because aptitude would probably resolve this by
downloading ubuntu version so it would break again, php5 packages
would probably needed to b
Hi all,
I would like to notice that I am now working on rewrite of mw-bot,
called wm-bot (wikimedia bot - it's supposed to serve in various
wikimedia chans), the bot now is supporting exactly same functions as
mw bot + some more, and I think it would be good if we replaced
current mw-bot in future
in
repository, anyway I don't think there would be many people interested
in keeping this version alive).
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:24 PM, John Du Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to notice that I am now wo
Hi Tim and Ian, thank you for mail,
I would like to note that for both extensions I am working on I
already received a support from community, both were announced and one
was even mentioned in Sign Post, the discussion on Proposals board was
closed for both of them in favor of installation to engl
fit from the new one. Especially thanks to that
it's located on labs and it's easier to operate it. Sorry for
misunderstandment :)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:12 PM, OQ wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
>> I don't know java, and no one else is actually ma
cated in svn (so all
devs can improve it) and binaries on labs (so all devs can operate
it). That's my point. Also from what I heard from Roan I wasn't really
sure there is someone who is handling the current bot code.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:44 PM, OQ wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 20
ly nice would be to see the code that runs mw-bot
> committed and running on labs.
>
> --
> ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:37:09 -0800, Petr Bena wrote:
>
>> I don't know java, and no one else is actuall
Thank you for reply,
the current logs are stored at http://bots.wmflabs.org/~petrb/logs/
for instance the dev channel is logged (some of the channels are not
being logged althought the folder exist), you can just jump for
instance to #mediawiki-move and type anything there (it's empty
channel), yo
Right so just to close this discussion somehow,
The bot I mentioned is now in some kind of working state and running
in several channels, I understood that you definitely don't want to
switch from current bot and I am happy with that, but since this one
is programmed in a different manner as rathe
Hi Mr. Nelson :P
I don't know if you are making fun of my bad english (I am not a
native english speaker, so that's why) or from the choice of
programming language, however if it's the second I already explained
why it's written in c# few hours ago. I hope it's clear enough and
actually I can't tu
Just noting that a channel is logged so those who won't be able to
attend can read the logs of channel at:
http://prototype.wikimedia.org/logs/%23wikimedia-dev/
or http://bots.wmflabs.org/~petrb/logs/%23wikimedia-dev/
Since I am in work where it's not so easy to connect there, I will
read the lo
Hi,
I wrote a nagios parser for wmflabs, it downloads instance list from
labsconsole and using simple application it parses it and generate
nagios configs, it's currently running periodicaly on
nagios.wmflabs.org and thanks to that nagios is updated when you
create a new instance, it parses the ge
601 - 648 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
