Thanks guys for the input.
I tested cacti, was an easy install, but the setup seemed so
counterintuitive for me that I had to look for another alternative.
Currently I am having success with zabbix www.zabbix.com which
compiled and installed without a hitch. Much easier IMO to manage.
creates
Marlon,
You want to know what else is funny?
How you just pick and choose what you want to hear.
Regards,
Dawn
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
MessageFunny how so few press outlets will ever talk about anything at all
negative about muni networks. This is clearly biased, but it's still a breath
Marlon,
You cannot lump all municipal networks together which you do on a
regular basis. According to a recent study
only about 50% of muni networks provide access to the public. In the
same report it mentions that there are
less and less municipalities taking on this responsibility and
We will be filing ours again also.
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482
Founding Member of WISPA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:11 PM
To: Joe
I have no idea, but there's a frial trial period. I'm still waiting
on my E70, but I plan on trying it out as soon as it gets here. I was
just curious if anyone else had played with it yet.
On 1/25/07, paul hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. Does it add a tab key as this seems to be the
Actually, once they post on this public, archived listserv that they
will not file, it becomes a permanent record and their business becomes
everyone's business.
You want WISPA to be taken seriously? You don't post on the list and say
I ain't filing.
It reflects poorly.
You don't want to
Yeah, we all tend to do that from time to time eh?
grin
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re: [WISP] New report on Muni Wifi
Marlon,
You want to
I have filled all previous requests, and plan on filing this one too.
I was just 'poking fun' at the CONFIDENTIAL issue at hand...
Cliff LeBoeuf
www.cssla.com
www.triparish.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Friday,
Sort of odd that last time I filed and I received no such notice to renew.
Forbes
I'm not particularly worried about my info getting into anyone's hands.
I've got nothing to hide. We'll fill it out again. I'm far more worried
about the fines than competitors learning anything useful from
I'm merely pointing out that all is not wine and roses in the muni market.
Yet, for some strange reason, we never hear about the problems. The Wall
Street Journal had a write-up about the Grant Co. network out here. Did
they print ONE word when the state auditor caught them giving over
Unlike me, you probably did yours correctly and on time! hehehehe
- Original Message -
From: Forbes Mercy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:21 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form FCC477
Sort of odd that last time I filed and I
I wish I could do that! I always hear what I dont want to ;)
On 1/26/07, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, we all tend to do that from time to time eh?
grin
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
Peter,
You are right. (At this time people should not state publically on this list
if they aren't going to file)
Also, I previously spoke spontaniously without thinking the issue through,
without any concept of time and due dates.
I wasn't putting two and two togeather to realize the filing
Don't misinterpret this as suggesting not to file, as I believe one should
file for various reasons. But I disagree with statements and the reason to
file are different.
First, At a FCC/WISP meeting, I remember a very enlightening presentation
from Patrick Leary. The key statement was Where
So I was a bit curious as to who this Center for Public Integrity (CPI) was and
who funded them and what their intent was. I looked them up and gave the guy
a call that is in charge of the lawsuit for CPI against the FCC. We had a long
chat and he referred me to their website and what they
Forbes,
Did you happen to ask them if they ever sold any of their data to
commercial organizations? That might also indicate their intent and why they
are pushing so hard...just a thought.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: Forbes Mercy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
disclaimerIANAL/disclaimer
The problem is, that if they win the suite, I think it would be for all
the information. Regardless of what their intent it, once that case is
made, the information is there for anyone.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Forbes Mercy wrote:
So I was a bit
I see your point, Sam.
Perhaps products like Linksys Routers could be a better example, or how
about YouTube? for the argument, or even our residential customers (this
oen rings a bell for many of us in this tech service industry, going all
the way back to dialup days).
I'm not sure about
Excellent job. Forbes, you are to be commended for going directly to the
source to register your opinion personally and to get the skinny. Beats
the heck out of a continued speculative thread with much rumor, angst,
and anger, but no action. Taking personal initiative like that is how
real change
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:23:19 -0500, Tom DeReggi wrote
Don't misinterpret this as suggesting not to file, as I believe one
should file for various reasons. But I disagree with statements and
the reason to file are different.
First, At a FCC/WISP meeting, I remember a very enlightening
My sentiments exactly! Excellent initiative Forbes.
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482
Founding Member of WISPA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 1:27 PM
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:15:04 -0800, Forbes Mercy wrote
So I was a bit curious as to who this Center for Public Integrity
(CPI) was and who funded them and what their intent was. I looked
them up and gave the guy a call that is in charge of the lawsuit for
CPI against the FCC. We had a
You know a paper like the Wall Street Journal is more interested in who 'ripped
off the public' or 'got lucky' so someone could get rich then someone who
actually worked for what they got. I submitted an article once about the
'write-off Billionaires of Seattle' showing the huge losses by
They have made billions by serving billions of customers.
Walmart and McDonalds only work on scale -- huge scale.
Lexus and Bose are not mass market.
And neither are many of you on this list.
In the DSL arena, the combined 300 ISPs selling in BellSouth territory
in its hey-day never had more
I understand that I don't have the market to be a Walmart, it was just a
general observation (and hence tagged as off topic). Kind of like
noting that Warren Buffet, who is considered one of the top investers in
the nation, made his billions in the market but refuses to deal with
tech stocks,
It doesn;t matter what their intent is. Them winning will set a presidence,
making it easier for others that may have mal-intent.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Forbes Mercy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
Sam Tetherow wrote:
Some of
us operate in the well under 10,000 people areas where 'finding a higher
ARPU customer' is not really a viable option. We have to be all things
in order to have enough customers to pay the bills.
This is how my market is, the biggest customer would be the
27 matches
Mail list logo
