It's generally known that the 20 Mb burst given by cable companies is
throttled to sustained download speeds in the 1-3 Mb range
That said, the point I'm trying to make is that the technology has come so far
for mobile cellular data that we are now unconsciously comparing it
side-by-side to
Yes, I have to agree that mobile has come a long way, since I was carrying
that big bag phone around.
That has to be a lot of power on the ap side.
~V~
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [mailto:c...@cticonnect.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 6:37 AM
To: li...@stlbroadband.com;
On 04/05/2011 07:37 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
It's generally known that the 20 Mb burst given by cable companies is
throttled to sustained download speeds in the 1-3 Mb range
That said, the point I'm trying to make is that the technology has come so
far for mobile cellular data that we are now
I have always said the cellular carriers have the over the air interface to
deliver good speeds for the most part. It's their backhaul network that
needs work and they are slowly and steadily upgrading that. While most are
bashing them, they eventually will have upgraded the sites to remain
The other question is how much do you pay for the service? It all comes
down to price.
I can deliver 10Mbps x 10Mbps up to 300Mbps x 300Mbps to anyone that
wants it... however, most people don't want to pay for it... ;)
Travis
Microserv
On 4/5/2011 5:37 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
It's generally
+1
very well said.. to the point !...
Innovate / Upgrade to keep up with the demand or become obsolete and
irrelevant. !
---
The WISP's themselves will need to keep business plans
that take advantage of emerging technologies and
I just activated my Samsung LTE MiFi router and am getting 6-10 Mbps
down and 5 Mbps up
at the office.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of St. Louis Broadband
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:33 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Verizon 4G LTE - WOW - update
I just checked my Charter via Ookla and it said I was getting 20 Mbps
Hi Tori,
The Charter service sounds horrible down there. Send me your GPS cords
and I'll check to see if we can get you a wireless link from our Bonne
Terre tower;-)
Jim
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of St. Louis Broadband
Sent: Monday,
It's actually NOT a lot of power on the AP side. It is the technology and
the air interface. Most CDMA technologies have very low threshold to make a
good link. I remember designing these networks and seeing great performance
with signals as low as -107dBm. In fact the whole goal with CDMA based
Blair,
I can help you with any Gmail questions you have. Give me a call anytime.
Shaun Hoggan
s...@ikano.commailto:s...@ikano.com
801-415-8113
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Blair Davis
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:15 PM
To: WISPA
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server
MailMax. Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating
integrating a new box. The requirements are: webmail,
just checking
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
response in 385 ms.
I'm on Verizon.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Chuck Profito cprof...@cv-access.comwrote:
just checking
Exactly why we need
1) Less spectrum to go to auctions, and more spectrum to go to unlicenced.
2) High power allowed in spectrum bands.
3) Manufacturters to raise their standard, to take advantage of latest radio
and antenna technologies.
Let me give you an example of what I mean..
yes +1, but WISPs can only upgrade if there is a product to upgrade to.
No one wants to upgrade without accomplishing enough compensation or gain to
match the effort and cost.
The industry has done a very good job at getting the price down on typical
style WISP gear.
But I'm not confident that
I know Axxcelera is planning LTE equipment in the 3.65 ghz band this year. It
is cost effective to deploy to businesses in an Internet/VoIP setup but will
not make it to the residential market at anything that will make money because
the cpe's run in the 300.00 range.
Sent from my iPhone
On
I know this is a bit OT, but.
I'm looking for options for DNS redundancy. In a nutshell, we have two
datacenters in two different cities. We need to have some redundancy for
our publicly accessible servers. We do NOT want to do round-robin DNS, and
auto-failover options are either not
I dont care what the CPE costs, I care about what the AP costs.
The big dollar APs can be a big deterent to grow organically.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List
I’m looking for options for DNS redundancy. In a nutshell, we have two
datacenters in two different cities. We need to have some redundancy for
our publicly accessible servers. We do NOT want to do round-robin DNS, and
auto-failover options are either not available or too costly at this
Rackspace has a pretty good deal and flexible for their cloud 'nix
stuff. Not sure about Windows.
Dylan
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 5:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Colo DNS
Are you looking for redundancy in DNS resolvers, or authoritative servers?
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Jason Hensley wrote:
I know this is a bit OT, but…
I’m looking for options for DNS redundancy. In a nutshell, we have two
datacenters in two different cities. We
In the 2500.00 range.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
I dont care what the CPE costs, I care about what the AP costs.
The big dollar APs can be a big deterent to grow organically.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
On 5 April 2011 17:00, Jason Hensley ja...@hensleycrew.com wrote:
I know this is a bit OT, but…
I’m looking for options for DNS redundancy. In a nutshell, we have two
datacenters in two different cities. We need to have some redundancy for
our publicly accessible servers. We do NOT want
Thanks all. Reliability is a MUST. Have talked to Rackspace - so far they
seem to have the best deal. Very reasonable for a Windows based Virtual
server
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:40 PM
To:
.. Hmmm...
Quick question... Have you considered taking up DNS hosting from the
different Registrars ?
Say ... TuCows ?
you will have a full control panel access... and you can modify your
records... plus no worries about redundancy etc. etc. ?
If for other reasons you are looking for
I’m looking for options for DNS redundancy. In a nutshell, we have two
datacenters in two different cities. We need to have some redundancy for
our publicly accessible servers. We do NOT want to do round-robin DNS, and
auto-failover options are either not available or too costly at this
I know Axxcelera is planning LTE equipment in the 3.65 ghz band this year. It
is cost effective to deploy to businesses in an Internet/VoIP setup but will
not make it to the residential market at anything that will make money
because the cpe's run in the 300.00 range.
So how much
DNSPark
Pretty inexpensive and I have never had a issue with them.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jason Hensley ja...@hensleycrew.com wrote:
I know this is a bit OT, but…
I’m looking for options for DNS redundancy. In a nutshell, we have two
datacenters in two different cities. We need
I am looking for my email that had numbers but from what i remember (don't hold
me to it) was 100 Meg. I will find the email to make sure.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
I know Axxcelera is planning LTE equipment in the 3.65 ghz band this year.
More importantly what axccelera expects to gain from doing lte? They are
already doing wimax
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:33 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
I know Axxcelera is planning LTE equipment in the 3.65 ghz band this year.
It is cost effective to deploy
Higher throughput from what I understand. I have their wimax deployed now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
More importantly what axccelera expects to gain from doing lte? They are
already doing wimax
Sent from my Motorola
LTE is 5 bits per hertz (ideal conditions), so on a 20MHz channel that
would be 100Mbps. WiMax (fixed) is 3.5 bits per hertz.
On 04/05/2011 07:13 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
Higher throughput from what I understand. I have their wimax deployed now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:07
And most wimax is 3.5 or 7mhz channel unless you are talking the mobile wimax
which has 10.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com wrote:
LTE is 5 bits per hertz (ideal conditions), so on a 20MHz channel that
would be 100Mbps. WiMax (fixed) is
That's air rate, actual throughput its about 60%... LTE Latency? IIRC it
was in the 100 ms?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bret Clark
On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
That's air rate, actual throughput its about 60%... LTE Latency? IIRC it
was in the 100 ms?
I can't comment on LTE, but we're doing a trial of mobile WiMAX and seeing
about 50-60ms back to the ASN gateway.
--
Blake Covarrubias
Depending on your cp ratio that will determine latency (atleast on mine). Lower
cp ratio gives lower latency numbers. We typically see 20ms.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Wimax or LTE?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 8:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Jeremie was talking about fixed WiMAX (802.16d). We see similar latencies on
our fixed WiMAX systems.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Wimax or LTE?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original
Wimax. Not mobile. Mobile has higher latency times.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Wimax or LTE?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From:
Yes, wimax latencies on d and e systems are documented, im talking about
LTE latency
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
Sent:
The Ericsson APs that Verizon uses cost ~$50k / tower plus antennas and cable
-Charles
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
LTE latency is about 60-100 ms
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 8:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Verizon 4G LTE - WOW - update
Yes, wimax latencies on d
I would expect LTE latency to be close to wimax because of scheduling.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com wrote:
LTE latency is about 60-100 ms
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
There is no fixed lte protocol..
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:24 PM
To: WISPA General
Better than being on meth ;)
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
response in 385 ms.
I'm on Verizon.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Chuck
+100%! I've upgraded my network to the point that I cant anymore but 90% of
the customers are fine with 1.5 or 3Mbps!
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
The other question is how much do you pay for the service? It all comes
down to price.
I can deliver 10Mbps
For now. I doubt that you will be able to sustain that 90% with 1.5 or 3.0
indefinitely. I know we won't.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of RickG
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Verizon
You can always upgrade More!
The key central question is ... how to 'Capitalize' on it and make some
Money.
There are always two ways the Market move .. Either PUSH (try to sell
your excess capacity on the network , making it attractive , lower the
selling price, while increasing
Thats what I thought which is why I spent so much time and money on
upgrading. I've got 30-50 megs at nearly every tower and I started offering
10Mbps posted rates. I even lowered the upgrade prices above 3Mbps. Very few
care and even fewer take it. In fact, I have some that ask if we have a
We dont have lines forming but we get as many customers are I want/need.
Sure, I could get lots more if I wanted but it's just more to worry about.
As far as Telco's, my ATT contacts says High Cap sales are virtually nill
around here. My Time Warner Rep says the same.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:19
51 matches
Mail list logo
