Actually, we do Gino and have never had a problem.
The latest generation of MT gear is pretty near bulletproof if deployed
properly.
I suspect there are quite a few people here that run their businesses on
gear that you would turn you nose up at, so your condescension isn't really
necessary.
No kidding!
It sure would be nice if it stopped, or those involved had the courtesy to
mark these toxic threads with a fresh subject line.
We've been through an audit with MikroTik gear, passed clear as a bell. My
understanding is that FCC rules are very similar to IC rules so modular
certs in
connecting a BM5 in client mode to a B5 in AP
mode?
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 12:17 AM, George Morris
ghmor...@candlelight.cawrote:
AirMAX is controlled at the AP end only. The client defaults to
non-AirMAX unless it detects an AirMAX AP. Your posted link is about CSMA,
not TDMA.
George
This is quite confusing that you have no control over AirMAX at the client
end. I'm more used to Nstreme where both ends have to be set the same.
Saying that, its really cool that you don't have to worry about the client,
just shift the AP in and out of AirMAX to suit and the client follows
AirMAX is controlled at the AP end only. The client defaults to non-AirMAX
unless it detects an AirMAX AP. Your posted link is about CSMA, not TDMA.
George
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, December
Art Kelly at DCI is a good guy. They make all kinds of stuff, including
shelters and cabinets for cellcos. Very responsive.
Art Kelly
DCI Sales
Cell 847 840 5520
artkelly-at-divcon.net
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
I think you're absolutely right. We don't see health care costs anywhere on
our paperwork up here in the frozen North (yes, it is snowing in the last
couple of days). We just pay higher taxes to cover it which is simply a fact
of life.
Everyone gets a health card that is just a different coloured
this is a bit off topic but does anyone have the
v4.0beta releases anywhere?
-Original Message-
From: George Morris [mailto:ghmor...@candlelight.ca]
Sent: 01 December 2009 15:35
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 20 mile link
I think the Rockets are going to be great, but right now
. Thanks George. Was this just in a PTP environment or PTM also?
-Original Message-
From: George Morris [mailto:ghmor...@candlelight.ca]
Sent: 04 December 2009 13:39
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 20 mile link
We really like beta3. Had some links running 90 days, and it was fast
guys were able to get on N with these?
Randy
George Morris wrote:
We really like beta3. Had some links running 90 days, and it was fast!!
Here is the cheat sheet specifically for beta3. Be careful if you are
running something else, the cheat sheet varied a lot.
- No WDS
- Short preamble
Good to see you're beating on him Mike.
The original post and comments section are here:
http://www.fiberevolution.com/2009/12/whats-a-bandwidth-hog-.html#comments
Some of the comments are pretty well thought out.
George
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
..
Eatmoresoap hit the nail on the head!
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:56 PM, George Morris
ghmor...@candlelight.cawrote:
Good to see you're beating on him Mike.
The original post and comments section are here:
http://www.fiberevolution.com/2009/12/whats-a-bandwidth-hog-.html#comments
Some of the comments
I think the Rockets are going to be great, but right now today the best
software is a beta version of 5.1. That pretty much says it all.
We have pulled all our MikroTik N links back out. 4.0beta3 was pretty good,
but N wireless performance and stability took a real nosedive with the
release
I think it's a fairly big project, although a lot of the fine work has been
done. I started drooling when reading the paper a few weeks ago.
It would be a kicker to have an open-source multi-platform TDMA
implementation. UBNT has encouraged open source firmware on their platforms
for a long time,
We have two 120s up so far.
One thing to watch is they have quite a flat 'pancake' so vertical aiming is
important.
They also have 2* of electrical downtilt built in to the 19 and 20 dB, and
4* built in to the lower gain sectors.
A few people have been bitten by the downtilt who didn't realize
. I read a post from one guy who had to actually do an uptilt
due to the downtilt of the thing. Are you seeing any improvement over what
you were using before?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of George Morris
Sent
differences are before
putting more jack in the 19's. Makes sense to me. Are you doing 2.4 or 5?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of George Morris
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:29 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re
We consider the 120s to be equivalent to 'conventional' 90s and plan
accordingly.
I don't like the -6dB rating, it gives a false impression.
George
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday,
Yes, you can.
Ubiquiti has such a device. It takes 802.3af from a switch, and converts it
to 16V regular passive PoE at the top of the tower.
http://www.ubnt.com/products/8023af.php
http://ubnt.com/downloads/instant8023af.pdf
George
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Its part of 5.4. In Canada, you have to stay out of 5600-5650 due to weather
radar, suspect the US may be much the same...
George
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 6:22 PM
To:
Mike put up a bit of info about what's on the way in 5.1 on DSLR. Appears we
are getting close to seeing a beta.
Features that are in 5.1:
- DynamicACK is rewritten with many improvements.
- Full 802.11abg support
- Full Encryption support (WEP, WPA/WPA2 AES/TKIP ect)
- ACK Removal for Point
We've had excellent results with these. Cheap, powerful and reliable.
George
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom Sharples
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] X86 low
Quite similar to the Pac dishes, although the mounts/hardware may be a
little more robust. We are particularly impressed with the dual-pol
performance. Seems like cross-pol isolation is pretty good.
A bit less impressed with the RPSMA connectors, but we bought a bunch of
LMR-240 pigtails to get
A 411AH with a built-in N radio in a nice plastic case would be great!
George
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone
I'm with you on this.
We have 30 mile links running 40MHz channels half-duplex with Nstreme on
411AH/XR-5s that run a rock solid 65Mbits TCP and 75Mbits UDP. That's
without Nstreme dual, just regular old Nstreme half duplex.
Getting closer brings the speeds up quite a bit.
We saw some stunning
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 100Mbps over 10 miles
I believe you but I want to know how to do it :)
On 11/14/09, George Morris
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of George Morris
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 11:21 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nearly 200 Mbit MikroTik link, was 100Mbps
It sure is. If ya got the bucks, Exalt or Dragonwave would be my first
choices.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 8:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Good thing its not the Nano Station 5Ms, you would still be waiting for the
firmware upgrade to actually be able to use them long after the boat finally
arrives once the pirates finally let it go.
Seems like promises, promises for now.
George Morris
Candlelight
866-924-0530 Direct
are you in George?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: George Morris ghmor...@candlelight.ca
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Metered Billing
Amen. It would be a very handy thing to maintain that list of speedtest
servers
Rick, there is a heck of a range of technology out there as you know.
Anything from the old Alvarion hoppers to the new stuff using N from
Ubiquiti and Mikrotik + dog.
It isn't the same game anymore, provided you can get your Internet pipe(s)
at a reasonable price.
Guaranteed bandwidth from a
and will represent an ROI. Yes, bandwidth is coming down ever so slowly
(here anyways).
So, what your saying is that the new equipment + lower bandwidth costs will
handle all of our future needs?
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, George Morris
ghmor...@candlelight.cawrote:
Rick, there is a heck
Amen. It would be a very handy thing to maintain that list of speedtest
servers centrally somewhere, perhaps within WISPA.
We don't belong to WISPA because its FCC centric which really doesn't help
us much. Much of the dues go to getting the FCC to move in a given direction
which isn't of much
, at 4:08 PM, George Morris ghmor...@candlelight.ca
wrote:
Amen. It would be a very handy thing to maintain that list of
speedtest
servers centrally somewhere, perhaps within WISPA.
We don't belong to WISPA because its FCC centric which really
doesn't help
us much. Much of the dues go
Rick, I don't think its up to Netflix to pay us. They in turn would have to
raise their prices which would further complicate things.
We need to make sure we get a fair price from our customers that reflects
our costs and hopefully profits.
So the customer pays Netflix and us for the movie they
Rick, did you have a self-serve portal where your customers could check
ongoing usage?
We are implementing IPtrack, same as Marlon. Brandon will build a
self-service portal for us.
We are also going to implement something called 'Moonlighting', where we
don't count bandwidth from Midnight to 6am
Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
--- Albert Einstein
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM, George Morris
ghmor...@candlelight.cawrote:
Rick, did you have a self-serve portal where
7, 2009 at 2:34 PM, George Morris
ghmor...@candlelight.cawrote:
Rick, I don't think its up to Netflix to pay us. They in turn would have
to
raise their prices which would further complicate things.
We need to make sure we get a fair price from our customers that reflects
our costs
, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
--- Albert Einstein
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:58 PM, George Morris
ghmor...@candlelight.cawrote:
That's interesting. So in theory we could just script a 'flicker' at the
APs
at Midnight, and another 'flicker' at 6am
at $3500/month. It was an easy sell.
There are a lot of great thinkers on this list. They'll help keep you clean
:)
-RickG
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:17 PM, George Morris
ghmor...@candlelight.cawrote:
Very good point Josh, it would be unfortunately to have a pro-consumer
initiative backfire because
40 matches
Mail list logo
