Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question..

I don't know if this works for winbox sessions, but for ssh/telnet... [admin@gw] /system script job> /system script job [admin@gw] /system script job> print # SCRIPT OWNER STARTED 0 admin jan/23/2012 19:45:24 1

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question..

Yeah I know it's not a good solution for a production router, that's why I said it depends on your situation... this is also why we don't use WinBox :) Matt Hoppes Director of Information Technology Indigo Wireless +1 (570) 723-7312 On 1/23/12 1:01 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Thanks.. > > I was

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question..

I think you can go into connections in the firewall and delete the appropriate connection for the winbox user. That should drop them. On 01/23/2012 10:01 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Thanks.. > > I was hoping that there would be a better way ... something like clear > connection .type command..

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question..

Thanks.. I was hoping that there would be a better way ... something like clear connection .type command.. ---rather an obscure but realistic situation--- ROS 5.x , Winbox connection can cause as much as 50% increase in CPU utilization. This gets to be of concern on core rou

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question..

If you have one of those sessions that hang out there even though the PC was melted 6 months ago...I haven't seen it cause any problems. Butch suggests the same. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Matt

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question..

Reboot? Other than that I'm not sure. You should be able to have multiple connections though -- unless someone got in that shouldn't have been. In which case change password, reboot is probably the fastest way out. Matt Hoppes Director of Information Technology Indigo Wireless +1 (570) 723-73

[WISPA] Mikrotik Question..

Hello, Anyone know on how to disconnect a remote winbox user or ssh user via command line on a Mikrotik ? Thanks. -- Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet& Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, Fl 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net --

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

Not sure, was a guess. On Nov 15, 2010 7:42 PM, "Butch Evans" wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: >> In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one >> dhcpc on each bridge? > > Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more than one bridg

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: > In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one > dhcpc on each bridge? Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more than one bridge. --

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

I think you guys are overlooking his statement that he does not control the DHCP server, and was looking to add multiple DHCP *clients* on a single interface using the same MAC in the DHCP requests. A few of us have stated multiple times is not currently possible with MikroTik. The solution is

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

You cannot add a single interface to multiple bridge's. My failed solution I provided to Matt did involve adding ether1 to a bridge, then setting auto-mac=no and admin-mac on the bridge to something other than ether1. -- Blake Covarrubias On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > In

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

I think Chupaka has posted on the MikroTik forms about having luck doing by turning RADIUS on for DHCP requests, and then setting up a freeradius server to handle the assignments. You can set up freeradius to match just about anything. Not the easiest thing in the world, but... -Kristian On Mon

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one dhcpc on each bridge? On Nov 15, 2010 7:00 PM, "Butch Evans" wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote: >> In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik > > You cannot do multiple dhc

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote: > In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik You cannot do multiple dhcp-clients, either (which is what you'd need). -- * Butch Evans

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

ubias Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:33 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface? A bit more detail…Matt also needs both DHCP clients to operate from the same source MAC address. I sent him a solution that uses two MAC addresses on the same physical port

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

A bit more detail…Matt also needs both DHCP clients to operate from the same source MAC address. I sent him a solution that uses two MAC addresses on the same physical port and does not involve VLANs, although its obviously of no use because it does not meet his requirements. What MikroTik nee

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik On 11/15/2010 03:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface.  You'll need to do vlans. On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, "Matt Jenkins" wrote: > Ok simplification of

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface. You'll need to do vlans. On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, "Matt Jenkins" wrote: > Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP > address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1 > static address, so why n

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1 static address, so why not more than 1 dynamic address? On 11/02/2010 01:15 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote: > How do I create a subinterface on an ethernet port

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

If you mean like eth0.1 and eth0.2 then you need to use a vlan switch, else once its on the wire, there is no way to know what comes from who. It would be best to place another multi port router inline to give you physical ports, or use vlans. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote: >

[WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

How do I create a subinterface on an ethernet port on a rb750? Bridged CPE -> Tik Port1 -> Port2 Cust 1 -> Port3 Cust 2 I need to create two sub interfaces on Port 1. One for each customer to receive an IP via DHCP. Then I need to NAT each of those sub in

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

This is why I'm still with 2.0 Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Forbes Mercy Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:32 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question It's AbacusTitanium

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

With the double Teflon coated string? All about the speed, man! -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:15 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question NEW

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

est of anything. Be it >>> software, computers, cars etc. >>> >>> Let someone else work out all of the bugs :-). >>> marlon >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Greg Ihnen" >>> To: "WISPA General Li

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

;> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer >> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:54 PM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question >> >> Personally I very rarely use

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

t; > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:54 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question > > Personally I very rarely use

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Honestly, how could I let that one go? Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:08 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question Best response ever. Josh

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

rlon K. Schafer > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:54 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question > > Personally I very rarely use the latest and greatest of anything.  Be it > software, computers, cars etc. > > Let someone else work out all of the b

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

y, July 06, 2010 3:54 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question Personally I very rarely use the latest and greatest of anything. Be it software, computers, cars etc. Let someone else work out all of the bugs :-). marlon - Original Message - From: "Greg Ihn

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question > What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is > current? Does that only apply to Linux kernels? > > Greg > > On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote: > >> I have been systems and networking since

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

) 205-1100 x106 From: "Robert West" Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:23 PM To: n...@brevardwireless.com, "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question Really? Honestly, there have been times when I would open up a box at an

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

They used to have x.y.z, but they abandoned that for some reason. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 7/1/2010 1:52 PM, Leon D. Zetekoff wrote: > On 7/1/2010 2:00 PM, Butch Evans wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote: >>> You do, h

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

4.x has been good to me. Comes with the newer boards... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:39 PM,

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

I won't knowingly go above 2.9.51 on my RB1xx boards. I finally got some 4.x boards out there now because that's what they came with. If the 4.x line is finally stable, maybe I'll raise my bar to that. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 7/1/2010 12:5

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On 7/1/2010 2:00 PM, Butch Evans wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote: You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do not always know it is broken. This is my second biggest complaint about Mikrotik. Their changelogs really SUCK! The f

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:20 -0400, Eric Tykwinski wrote: > Do you usually export the config and paste in the new router? > Or can I do a backup and restore with that big of a version difference? It will need to be done via export/paste. Just do small sections at a time, though, because SOME of t

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

: [WISPA] Mikrotik question Backup/restore only works same versions, same hardware. Export can be made to work across versions, but the parameter names do occasionally change. Quite annoying. Also, if you do not strip out MAC addresses, the import will set the MAC on your interfaces to be what is

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Backup/restore only works same versions, same hardware. Export can be made to work across versions, but the parameter names do occasionally change. Quite annoying. Also, if you do not strip out MAC addresses, the import will set the MAC on your interfaces to be what is in the config. Not usuall

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 13:20, Eric Tykwinski wrote: > > Quick question for you guys... > When your upgrading from old version to a new version: > IE. I've got an old x86 2.9 which I'm going to replace with a RB1100 on > 4.10 > (I'm with Rob in that if it isn't broke, I'm not touching it.) > > Do

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

haos in my life. LOL Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Nick Olsen Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 1:09 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question If only we were so lucky... Nick Olsen Network

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Quick question for you guys... When your upgrading from old version to a new version: IE. I've got an old x86 2.9 which I'm going to replace with a RB1100 on 4.10 (I'm with Rob in that if it isn't broke, I'm not touching it.) Do you usually export the config and paste in the new router? Or can

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote: > You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do > not always know it is broken. This is my second biggest complaint about Mikrotik. Their changelogs really SUCK! The first biggest complaint is not fit for a public

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 09:54 -0500, David E. Smith wrote: > what's the recommendation for versions > and upgrades? If you are using wireless: 4.10 for NEW deployments, ESPECIALLY if you are using nstreme. For existing deployments, if you are doing ptmp and NO nstreme, then any version that is

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

If only we were so lucky... Nick Olsen Network Operations (321) 205-1100 x106 From: "Robert West" Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:24 PM To: "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question I tend to keep the MT bo

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

: WISPA General List Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:53:11 -0430 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is current? Does that only apply to Linux kernels? Greg On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote: >

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

e not one bit of trouble. I wish everything else was like that. :) Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:55 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik questio

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is current? Does that only apply to Linux kernels? Greg On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote: > I have been systems and networking since about 1980. Some of it for some > Fortune 100 companies. > The advice is, if it

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

I have been systems and networking since about 1980. Some of it for some Fortune 100 companies. The advice is, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do not always know it is broken. Keeping things all at 1 or 2 versions simplifies l

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Don't forget that the 750 uses ether1 as a wan and protects it as such (turns off cdp, etc). Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchil

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 20:04, Butch Evans wrote: > > And whether they bother to power them up and test them prior to shipping > (which I do..every one) Here's a sorta-related question (which probably should be on the Mikrotik-Users list, but whatevs) - what's the recommendation for versions an

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 20:45 -0400, Scott Reed wrote: > 4.10 is now the stable. (4.1 is nine revisions prior to 4.10 in MTs > numbering) Takes a while for it to get through the distribution > channels, so many are coming in with 4.5. I had some come in last week > with 3.23, so it depends on h

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

4.10 is now the stable. (4.1 is nine revisions prior to 4.10 in MTs numbering) Takes a while for it to get through the distribution channels, so many are coming in with 4.5. I had some come in last week with 3.23, so it depends on how many the distributor ordered and what the demand has been.

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

I thought they are calling 4.1 the stable release? Greg On Jun 30, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Scott Reed wrote: > Most everything I get now has 4.5. Works just like the 3.x stuff did. > If it has a serial port, see what Hyperterminal shows during boot. I > have had a couple of 411R come in DOA. > > F

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Most everything I get now has 4.5. Works just like the 3.x stuff did. If it has a serial port, see what Hyperterminal shows during boot. I have had a couple of 411R come in DOA. Forbes Mercy wrote: > Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its v4.5 > not 4. Thanks for th

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

n...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Forbes Mercy > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:02 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik question > > Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its v4.5 > not 4. Thanks fo

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Behalf Of Forbes Mercy Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:02 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik question Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its v4.5 not 4. Thanks for the help. On 6/30/2010 11:56 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote: > We put a new Mikrotik 411

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

t > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:02, Forbes Mercy > wrote: > > > Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its > v4.5 > > not 4. Thanks for the help. > > > > On 6/30/2010 11:56 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote:

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:02, Forbes Mercy wrote: > Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its v4.5 > not 4. Thanks for the help. > > On 6/30/2010 11:56 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote: > > We put a new Mikrotik 411 in service and it has v4 on it. We can't log > > into it with the

[WISPA] Mikrotik question

Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its v4.5 not 4. Thanks for the help. On 6/30/2010 11:56 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote: > We put a new Mikrotik 411 in service and it has v4 on it. We can't log > into it with the web interface or winbox. Is this a new "feature"? > > Forbes

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

way to create dynamic > queues for connected clients? > > -Cameron > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Jason Hensley > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 4:14 PM > To: 'WISPA General List&#x

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:46 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote: > I like the idea of a dynamic queue is there a way to create dynamic > queues for connected clients? One other method I just thought of is PCQ. PCQ is a queue type that will allow you to classify a customer by IP address (in mangle) and th

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:05 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote: > What is the best way to provide speed limit per clients where they are > not all MT clients? This can be done via queues. That's a better solution than the layer2 approach anyway (sort of). > I would like to have something setup where e

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

lf Of Jason Hensley Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 4:14 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question RADIUS and PPPoE. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Cameron Kilton Sent: Friday, April 24,

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

RADIUS and PPPoE. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Cameron Kilton Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:06 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question What is the best way to provide speed

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

this with hotspot, but this > is not for hotspot function. > > -Cameron > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Butch Evans > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:13 PM > To: WISPA General List > S

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

MT Queues Scott Carullo Brevard Wireless 321-205-1100 x102 Original Message > From: "Cameron Kilton" > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:58 PM > To: "WISPA General List" > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question > > What is the best way to

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

hotspot, but this is not for hotspot function. -Cameron -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Butch Evans Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:13 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:22

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:22 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote: > I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help > but notice the options in the wireless tab for: > > Default AP Tx Rate: > And > Default Client TX Rate: These 2 options set default rates for how much bandwidth is

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

AP TX rate works on any client, but you have to have MT for the client TX rate .. :) * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Rate-limiting. But only works with MT clients. (i.e. not other WiFi clients) On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Cameron Kilton wrote: > I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help > but notice the options in the wireless tab for: > > Default AP Tx Rate: > And > Defa

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question

Why you take a RouterOS class :) But regardless, if you ahve a MT client, it will set the TX and RX speeds for the clients by default. YOu can set that by MAC as well, so you can control the bandwidth from the AP to the CPE. * --- Dennis

[WISPA] Mikrotik question

I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help but notice the options in the wireless tab for: Default AP Tx Rate: And Default Client TX Rate: Any insight on what this does? I couldn't seem to find much info on it. Thanks, Cameron

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question.

le to rate limit by packet mark I believe > > > > Mike Goicoechea > > > > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Matt Jenkins > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:53 PM > To: WISP

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question.

nt: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:53 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question. I need to do packet and bandwidth throttling on some users. I hear everyone say that Mikrotik is the answer. However I need something that will be a bridge (not route) and throttle by MAC address

[WISPA] Mikrotik Question.

I need to do packet and bandwidth throttling on some users. I hear everyone say that Mikrotik is the answer. However I need something that will be a bridge (not route) and throttle by MAC address only. Can Mikrotik do this? - Matt --