MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
Marlon,
What is the frequency of the phone system you speak of? Since this is a
thread on DECT phones and you have never heard
quot;
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
> Yeah, a nice 4 line in and up to 8 cordless extensions would be nice.
>
> You have a Good Day now,
>
>
> Carl A Jeptha
> http://www.airnet.ca
> Office Ph
, March 24, 2007 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
Yeah, a nice 4 line in and up to 8 cordless extensions would be nice.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajepth
Yeah, a nice 4 line in and up to 8 cordless extensions would be nice.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
John Valenti wrote:
On March 23, at 1:00 PM March 23, "Rich Comroe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On March 23, at 1:00 PM March 23, "Rich Comroe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a reason you haven't seen these products here. I began
searching for why the last time a thread discussed the 1.9GHz UL
band surfaced on this list. I doubt you'll ever see much product
ever emerge for thi
groundrules for clearing the Pt-Pt users from the band were
more than enough to insure that this UL band would never be
effectively utilized in the United States.
Just my opinion,
Rich
- Original Message - From: Ralph To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 200
me the usage
rules are a minimal "must listen before talking" play-nice. That doesn't seem
overly restrictive to me.
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones t
best knowledge.
>
>Rich
> - Original Message -
> From: John Scrivner
> To: WISPA General List
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
>
>
> $50K up front and 50 cents a device to control an
permenantly
cancelled to my best knowledge.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
$50K up front and 50 cents a device to control an entire ban
ch 22, 2007 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
$50K up front and 50 cents a device to control an entire band in the US
sounds like a pretty cheap deal to me. I am surprised nobody jumped on
that. I do not see that as too much to pay and I am very sur
nd would never be effectively utilized in the
United States.
Just my opinion,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Ralph
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
I deployed a DECT
I avoid those pesky 2.4 GHz phones when I can. I had a Panasonic 2.4 GHz
in my house that would take me offline and mess with phone calls when
using the net. I have tried to always use 900 MHz phones with DSSS. Not
easy to find these days sadly. I was not aware of an unlicensed band at
1.9 GHz.
the
United States.
Just my opinion,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Ralph
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
I deployed a DECT (Digital European Cordless Telecommun
Message-
From: Ralph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 March 2007 17:45
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
I deployed a DECT (Digital European Cordless Telecommunications) system with
450 handsets several years ago.
The p
alf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:54 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.
All,
I am sure some of you have already thought of this but I would suggest a
great alternative to avoid interference with the most common frequencies
How many lines in does this system have?
I am dealing with an insurance company who is treating my wife and they
want her to use a cordless headset (shoulder injury). Well we have the
business line, the voip line and the homeline, and soon another business
line. so we are now looking at a 4line
Are they legal to use unlicensed in the US, and ...do you have a URL? :)
Thanks
George
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
All,
I am sure some of you have already thought of this but I would suggest a
great alternative to avoid interference with the most common frequencies
used to deploy wireless networks
PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Langseth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issu
We ran into this in our office, a couple of the headset units we have
are 2.4 ghz freq. hopping units and the linksys waps we use(d) would die
every time a phone call came through. We also have one DECT headset that
causes no problems. On another note, I am using another AP currently
that uses an A
All,
I am sure some of you have already thought of this but I would suggest a
great alternative to avoid interference with the most common frequencies
used to deploy wireless networks would be to use DECT cordless phones in
the house. They use the 1.9Ghz frequency and are relatively inexpensiv
20 matches
Mail list logo
