Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

I agree with you that the FCC may have made a mistake here although their intentions are correct. At the same time though, I think you may be overreacting. Remember that the FCC's regulations are only one factor to consider. Take part 15 for example... We all know what the FCC's regulations are

Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

: 760.580.0080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Erskine Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 8:45 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order John Scrivner wrote: Patrick, I

RE: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Erskine Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 8:45 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order John Scrivner wrote: > Patrick, I would expect that the optimistic perspective wo

Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Erskine Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 8:45 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order John Scrivner wrote: Patrick, I would expect that the optimistic perspective would be better here. This is better than

RE: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

, 2007 8:45 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order John Scrivner wrote: > Patrick, I would expect that the optimistic perspective would be > better here. This is better than no protections at all. At least we > have a statement fro

Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

John Scrivner wrote: Patrick, I would expect that the optimistic perspective would be better here. This is better than no protections at all. At least we have a statement from the FCC that we must try to work together here. That is better than the "Wild West" we have in Part-15. For sure "owni

RE: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

lvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:04 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the

Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

since 1999! [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:38 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] the big wild card statemen

RE: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

.0080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:51 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order Agreed. I would think binding arbitration

RE: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:39 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order Sounds like this would be an opportunity for me to offer my services as a

RE: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

nt: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:34 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order Patrick, I would expect that the optimistic perspective would be better here. This is better than no protections at all. At least we have a statement from the FCC that we m

Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

Agreed. I would think binding arbitration would be a best practice for 2 people in the 3650 band who could not reach amicable terms. I would support this in the event I could not get myself and a competitor to "put on our big boy pants" and settle our differences. You would make a fine "spectru

Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

Sounds like this would be an opportunity for me to offer my services as a neutral and knowledgeable arbitrator. :) My charge to keep companies out of trouble would be only a small fraction of the legal fees that would result when people get themselves into trouble. As a retired firefighter,

Re: [WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

Patrick, I would expect that the optimistic perspective would be better here. This is better than no protections at all. At least we have a statement from the FCC that we must try to work together here. That is better than the "Wild West" we have in Part-15. For sure "owning" the spectrum in a

[WISPA] the big wild card statement from the 3650 order

"(d) All applicants and licensees shall cooperate in the selection and use of frequencies in the 3650-3700 MHz band in order to minimize the potential for interference and make the most effective use of the authorized facilities. A database identifying the locations of registered stations will be