Already belong to TCMLink. So don't think I can register again. Oh I do
have 2 airplanes and I think only 1 is registered. But I don't have engine
S/N here.
Thanks,
bb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:15 PM
Patrick- Do you have an expected date for Alvarions 5.4 VL?
Marty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] RE:
Congress Realizes Broadband Data Sucks
Finally does something about it years later...
User erin1 writes in: The Senate Commerce Committee today voted unanimously
in favor of S. 1492 (pdf), which would require the FCC to come up with a
revised definition for broadband within 120 days of the bill's
Hey Guys,
I am trying to build some super cheap backhauls. How much traffic could
I pass with the 133 and a couple of sr5, and would I want a level 3 or 4
lic?
Thanks,
Brian
Would you like to see your
I heard that if a deployed CPE fails you can replace it with an old system,
but you can't have new deployments with old gear.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
haha, good one.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bison Pro Fab
Gino,
Well, I'd
12-15 meg.. depending on rules, connection tracking off may get you more.
On 7/20/07, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am trying to build some super cheap backhauls. How much traffic could
I pass with the 133 and a couple of sr5, and would I want a level 3 or 4
lic?
Don't use 133s for backhauls. You will NOT get 12meg-15meg We have a 133
in place that is at 100% CPU utilization at 6meg with very very little else
going on other then traffic.
JohnnyO
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
6 meg would do. I would install a higher cpu unit later.
Brian
JohnnyO wrote:
Don't use 133s for backhauls. You will NOT get 12meg-15meg We have
a 133 in place that is at 100% CPU utilization at 6meg with very very
little else going on other then traffic.
JohnnyO
- Original
Tranzeo isn't cheap when you consider the failure rate.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ralph
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:09 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] RB 133c
Why not use a couple or Tranzeos or Deliberants
I have a 133 that loses 50% of its throughput at 8 Mb/S
And it is only being used as a hotspot router with one user.
In circuit, throughput is 4. With it out of circuit, throughput goes up to
8.
This is a plain routerboard, 2.9.44 with no radios in the loop at all.
I'm thinking the 133 is about
http://64.233.179.110/blog_resources/Google_Ex_Parte_Letter_Signed.pdf
Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This footnote confirms that this email
That is wonderful news if you ask me!
Drew Lentz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 12:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Google
Out of curiousity what is Super Cheap with an rb setup like this?
Ryan
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
6 meg would do. I would install a higher cpu unit later.
Brian
JohnnyO wrote:
Don't use 133s for backhauls. You will NOT get 12meg-15meg We have
a 133 in place that is at 100% CPU
Yes, however JohnnyO is stating that it's at 100% CPU utilization, so you'd
need more if you get similar results.
Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL
Brian,
Use the RB 532 or 532A. Little more expensive, but I get 20 Mbit/sec +
thru them in a PtMP setup on 5.8GHz with sr5 or xr5 cards.
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am trying to build some super cheap backhauls. How much traffic
could I pass with the 133 and a couple of sr5, and
I plan on using a big enough enclosure to put whatever radio in there I
need to in the future, but for now, it looks like a $59 rb will do. I
also will be using some dual pol solid dishes, and hooking up both
cables to the enclosure, then, I am all set ip for a full duplex
upgrade. All I'd
It is great news to spur the coming future of broadband ubiquity, and I
mean ubiquity not only relative to place, but also in terms of what gets
connected. I ain't about cell phones anymore, that's for sure. If the
thing can benefit from intelligence and networking, expect an effort to
make such a
Ya, but it's an extra $280 per link, times 10. It's that $2800 I don't
have now.
Blair Davis wrote:
Brian,
Use the RB 532 or 532A. Little more expensive, but I get 20 Mbit/sec
+ thru them in a PtMP setup on 5.8GHz with sr5 or xr5 cards.
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am
There are RB 600s, and 1000s coming out. the 600s with the daughterboard
looks the most promising I still have no ETA on any of them though.
On 7/20/07, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ya, but it's an extra $280 per link, times 10. It's that $2800 I don't
have now.
Blair
Which is why I don't want to invest more than $59 into a board today.
Brian
Dennis Burgess wrote:
There are RB 600s, and 1000s coming out. the 600s with the daughterboard
looks the most promising I still have no ETA on any of them though.
On 7/20/07, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would 600 and 1000 mean mhz? Where would a guy find specs for these new
boards?
Brian
Dennis Burgess wrote:
There are RB 600s, and 1000s coming out. the 600s with the daughterboard
looks the most promising I still have no ETA on any of them though.
On 7/20/07, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL
I was just told by one of my suppliers that the RB 532 and 532A are
being end of life'ed in favor of the RB 600...
Hope that the 600 will fit in the same NEMA boxes I use.
Blair
Dennis Burgess wrote:
There are RB 600s, and 1000s coming out. the 600s with the daughterboard
looks the most
no it will not. It is a much bigger board!
On 7/20/07, Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just told by one of my suppliers that the RB 532 and 532A are
being end of life'ed in favor of the RB 600...
Hope that the 600 will fit in the same NEMA boxes I use.
Blair
Dennis Burgess
No, visit http://www.mikrotikconsulting.com and hit the blog, there is a
link there with information on them.
On 7/20/07, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would 600 and 1000 mean mhz? Where would a guy find specs for these new
boards?
Brian
Dennis Burgess wrote:
There are RB
I looked on the blog, but didn't see how big they would be. I need to
make sure I have big enough enclosures. Anyone have any ideas on
enclosures.
Brian
Dennis Burgess wrote:
No, visit http://www.mikrotikconsulting.com and hit the blog, there is a
link there with information on them.
On
Can anyone serve this location?
27W174 North Ave.
West Chicago, IL 60185
(630) 231
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the
http://www.hyperlinktechnologies.com/
Do I need to get a spoon??
Happy Friday everyone.
On 7/20/07, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked on the blog, but didn't see how big they would be. I need to
make sure I have big enough enclosures. Anyone have any ideas on
enclosures.
As it pertains to the previous postings...
Google open to wireless bid
By Richard Waters in San Francisco
Published: July 20 2007 21:19 | Last updated: July 20
2007 21:19
Google has disclosed for the first time that it is
prepared to bid in a forthcoming auction of wireless
spectrum in the US,
We made the date. Yeehaw! It was quite a feat and we have done it with
backward capability even with new CPE in old sectors, which is huge.
This is a big advantage for BreezeACCESS VL 5.3 GHz users and it
demonstrates once again our long term commitment to protect the
investment of our WISPs. It
m fod says homer
Zack Kneisley wrote:
http://www.hyperlinktechnologies.com/
Do I need to get a spoon??
Happy Friday everyone.
On 7/20/07, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked on the blog, but didn't see how big they would be. I need to
make sure I have big
There's a PDF of a presentation before the Orlando MUM. I can't seem to
find it at the moment, but its the best representation of the new boards
I've seen.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL
Anyone have issues with using certain routers connecting to Tranzeo
cpe? We had an issue today trying to get a DLink to work. We have
connectivity to the net with a laptop directly connected to the
Tranzeo but it will not work through the DLink. Belkin routers seem to
work fin ebut I hate those.
We use D-Link almost exclusively for routers and haven't had any
problems connecting them to TR5a-24fs or TR-SL5-16fs. We mostly set the
TRs up in bridge mode with the router behind them, but have started
moving to using the TR as a router and having the dlink DHCP off of the TR.
Sam
Congradulations Alvarion!
I'm pretty sure that makes you guys first across the finish line, on that
topic.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Actually, Moto's came in day before officially (posted on the OET site).
Unofficially, our was completed before but the lab engineer went home
early and did not post it on the site. So a day apart. The important
thing was to get it in before the deadline -- that was the mission on
our side.
T-Mobile launched their [EMAIL PROTECTED] service at the end of June.
I picked up one of these cell phones a few weeks ago. The deal is for
an extra $10/month, you get unlimited calls in the US if they are
made over wifi. The wifi connection generally works with any open AP,
or if you know
That results in double nat... That plays hell with streaming and VPN in my
area. I can always tell when someone has done that in this area because they
call me to tell me how much the service stinks.
If people want to have a wireless router in their house I tell them to set
the LAN IP of the
Haven't had any problems yet, but thanks for the heads up.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
That results in double nat... That plays hell with streaming and VPN in my
area. I can always tell when someone has done that in this area because they
call me to tell me how much
Pat, I found it somewhat difficult to locate on OET
website:
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/
Do you have a more direct weblink?
Thanks,
Felix
--- Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Moto's came in day before officially
(posted on the OET site).
Unofficially, our was completed
Nice write up John. I have Sprint network with Samsung
phone unfortunately locked in for 2 years. However,
the T-Mobile offering looks appealing. So you had
session persistance? Nice. Can you re-clarify that you
did not have to re-authenticate at all? For example
let's say you walk out of
I think we are going to see an increase in the deployment of femtocells like
T-Mobiles ... not just cell carriers (ATT to follow T-Mobile?
http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=129159print=true) but by people
trying to push content into living rooms:
Today's Femtocell Headline:
Google
Here Felix. You can enter as few fields as you wish. If you enter
frequencies, uncheck the exact match box.
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm
- Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Felix A. Lopez
Sent:
43 matches
Mail list logo
