I'll bet its ping times are still in the hundreds of milliseconds.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron D. Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
Actually - the iDirect (NO
Hi
we are one of the ISP in india
working now WISP solution to deploy Wireless as last mile for the Bussiness
users
Subsequent want to deploy for the Home users
So looking for WRAP boards/ Software and Support for the same
Contact me offline for the same project
Ram
I half expect that the whole speed of light latency issue will be
eliminated sometime in my lifetime - that is, instantaneous
communication between any two points with no meaningful delay.
Unfortunately, when it happens, I suspect that those of us in the
business of putting up infrastructure
My higgs field modulator system has zero latency and infinite BW but if you
use anything over a few femtowatts it tends to loosen the foundation of the
building you are in.
- Original Message -
From: Forrest W. Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
If you had a really tiny monkey with really tiny hands and had them actually
grab one of the entangled photons, bring it to a rest and then shake it in
the opposite polarization, will the other monkey holding the other photo
feel the change?
- Original Message -
From: Forrest W.
I am using a Linux box as the router, I am going to add a couple more
interfaces to that box and call the problem solved for now. Going
forward I will be looking at a topology change to prevent these
issues. PPPoE looks like the ticket.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Butch Evans [EMAIL
yep.
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
If you had a really tiny monkey with really tiny hands and had them actually
grab one of the entangled photons, bring it to a rest and then shake it in
the opposite polarization, will the other monkey holding the other photo
feel the change?
- Original
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
Just a word of caution, native Linux will only work up to a certain point
with PPPoE/L2TP.
Jeff
Can you expand on that a bit?
I mean obviously you you need other bits to make a complete solution
(RADIUS/DNS/DHCP maybe some LDAP/Cert Authority/VPN). I would
What they make Mikrotik for! :)
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik
Forrest W. Christian wrote:
I half expect that the whole speed of light latency issue will be
eliminated sometime in my lifetime - that is, instantaneous
communication between any two points with no meaningful delay.
You aren't that far off. Lots of quantum network research being done.
ram wrote:
Hi
we are one of the ISP in india
working now WISP solution to deploy Wireless as last mile for the Bussiness
users
Subsequent want to deploy for the Home users
So looking for WRAP boards/ Software and Support for the same
Contact me offline for the same project
Ram
I fully expect them to run into the same brick wall the prevents reverse
time travel.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
Forrest W.
It's a scale issue. I wish I could tell you exactly where it will fail, but
there are a lot of variables. We've been able to get 3000 plus users, but that
takes a powerful system, lots of RAM, and a LOT of work with Linux itself.
Jeff
Sent from my Palm PDA.
-Original Message-
From:
Guess I better sell my WISP and start a tiny monkey ranch.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Charles Wyble wrote:
Forrest W. Christian wrote:
I half expect that the whole speed of light latency issue will be
eliminated sometime in my lifetime - that is, instantaneous
Hey guys and gals,
We are looking at our first redundant fiber connection from a second carrier
and feeling the need to have our own IPs so that this will work out well.
Anybody have advice on where to start with ARIN, besides just fishing around
on the website, and what should we be looking at
If you can justify a... /22? then you should have your own IPs from ARIN.
Other than that, you can't have them.
All I can say is look at their site in the IPv4 numbers section (I think)
and then locate the forms and fill them out.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Is anyone buying IPv6? Should we look at that as well?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
If you can justify a... /22? then you should have your own IPs from ARIN.
Other than that, you can't have them.
All I can say is look at their site in the IPv4
Hi Charles,
It's a scale issue. I wish I could tell you exactly where it will fail, but
there are a lot of variables.
We've been able to get 3000 plus users, but that takes a powerful system,
lots of RAM, and a LOT of work with Linux itself.
Regards,
Jeff
ImageStream
-Original
We have an IPv6 block. Mostly just for testing right now. You can peer up
with Hurricane Electric over an IPv4 tunnel for testing.
Our routing guru handles our ARIN requests. You are welcome to tap him for
some guidance if you need it. Tony Mattke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Thank you,
Zak
Mike Hammett wrote:
If you can justify a... /22? then you should have your own IPs from ARIN.
Other than that, you can't have them.
Correct. The minimum allocation has been going up. I used to control
some /24 netblocks of portable
space. Was cool. :)
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 -
Zachery Wolfinger wrote:
We have an IPv6 block. Mostly just for testing right now. You can peer up
with Hurricane Electric over an IPv4 tunnel for testing.
Yep. Tunnelbroker.net
You can get a /48 and /64.
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
Hi Charles,
It's a scale issue. I wish I could tell you exactly where it will fail, but
there are a lot of variables.
Oh certainly. The Linux kernel and user space could use a whole lot of
tuning in many many many many places. :)
We've been able to get 3000 plus
John McDowell wrote:
We are looking at our first redundant fiber connection from a second carrier
and feeling the need to have our own IPs so that this will work out well.
If you're multihoming, yeah, it'll be a lot easier if you get your own
ASN and allocation of IP space.
The tricky bit is
Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
To answer the original question that was asked.
Where to start:
Start with Arin's web site, fill out the form, send it in, and feel free to
talk to them on the phone.
They may come across rather 'stiff' via email communication, howerver on
the phone they are very
Brick wall or SOLID ROCK?!
We just need to avoid John and his other John friends from Planet 10!
ryan
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
I fully expect them to run into the same brick wall the prevents reverse
time travel.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
You need an IPv6 compatible upstream to put that to use. That said, getting
an IPv6 allocation isn't a bad idea if you have the possibility of getting
IPv6 transit, even if you don't. That way you're ready when the time comes.
It'll be here before you know it.
--
Mike Hammett
Upstream protection is the #1 reason to have your own IP block. Plenty of
people have their own IP block, but don't do any of those things.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Charles Wyble
We have the opportunity to get on a tower owned by Crown Castle
International for a pretty decent rent. However, they want the general
contractor over any work to have a 5 million dollar umbrella policy.
Having a hard time finding a general with anything near that. Any
recommendations in the
You can request a /22 if you can demonstrate efficient use of a /23 if
multihomed. Otherwise, you need to demonstrate a /20.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Faisal Imtiaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are a general contractor with 10 million I think. That much insurance is
not all that expensive.
Any general contractor should be able to buy a one time rider to their
policy to bump up the coverage.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
I'll see if our current candidate is willing to do this. It's such a
small job, he's just about ready to throw in the towel dealing with all
the red tape as it is.
Randy
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
We are a general contractor with 10 million I think. That much insurance is
not all that
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Dennis Burgess wrote:
What they make Mikrotik for! :)
And ImageStream, too. The point Jeff was making is that there are
some optimizations that should be handled that are not in the
default configuration of most Linux distros.
--
The first thing to understand is if you are prepaired to adequately route
with your own IPs.
There is a clear advantage to ahving your own IPs, from the perspective that
you will no longer be held hostage by your upstream, having the freedom to
be portable between transit providers.
However,
Thats not bad. Many times they want 10,000.
It should not be hard to get a 5 million umbrella. Any insurance company
will do it.
The catch is
1) Get your primary as a 1 million coverage, and then get teh Umbrella as an
additional 4 million. The umbrella is a seperate line item. What this
34 matches
Mail list logo
