Yeah it does, as long as there aren't three 500W 930Mhz paging vert pol
Omnis next to your radios.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Tim Edwards t...@telescience.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
I checked all of this before posting. That is the reason for the
original question about how to see processor load. I was hoping someone
would know that Mikrotik had provided something like top (for Linux) or
Task Manager (for Windows) that shows the processes using the
processor. Would
Their isn't any way to see the processes running on a MikroTik unit. If you
have run away cpu load. Create a supout.rif file and send it to MikroTik
support and they can figure it out. The supout.rif contains info I understand
about running processes but they are the only ones that have the
Radwin 2000... plus its quad-band (2.4GHz, 5.3GHz, 5.4GHz, 5.8GHz) and DFS
compliant... and under $5k
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of c...@midcoast.com
Sent:
Couldn't you run a bridge computer with something like Untangle
running to see what the traffic contains at the tower site? I've
never run Untangle, but have considered setting up such a device to
put at a troublesome node for analysis. Thoughts?
Mike
At 07:41 AM 9/2/2009, you wrote:
Their
Hello,
While this is not necessarily a WISP issue, I would like to lean on the
experience of the WISPs and wireless operators on these lists.
I am building a new repeater site on the top of a 4K foot peak. I have
my solar worked out and I am augmenting it with a TEG. The TEG burns
propane and
You can purchase a one way vavle for this type of setup. You shoudl be able to
get it from the local propane seller or maybe an RV supply. Place it at the
top between your fill line and the tank. If the pipe does break for some
reason the only gas that will be lost is what is in the
Thanks Eje. If it looks like it is really a problem I will send them
the file.
e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
Their isn't any way to see the processes running on a MikroTik unit. If you
have run away cpu load. Create a supout.rif file and send it to MikroTik
support and they can figure it
Why horizontal polarity? Cause I'm a total idiot when it comes to 900mhz
and as my luck usually runs, if I go by the book nothing works until I do
what I'm not supposed to do. But, also as my luck runs, the opposite of
what I try first will work So it actually won't matter what I do including
Using horizontal polarity helps avoid interference from vertical polarity.
From what I read/experience a 25db difference.
For example, my MT AP is hpol. On a customer site with nice clean LOS was
getting -85, weaksauce. I went down, turned it 90 and back up to get -60.
Someone built that one
Ryan,
I know very little about this but in the Sierra's during high snow fall
years, people without a high load protective roof above their tanks almost
always have tank leaks and explosions due to the weight of snow breaking the
regulator and or copper pigtail. On a slope I guess you would also
Cam,
Are you using WDS for the link? I hear (and we're going to experiment
today if I have some time) that WDS on 802.11N doesn't work full speed,
but that you can set up a normal bridge / station link and run mpls
across is much more efficiently.
I do also have a Radwin in the air for a
But look at all the experience you are gaining :)
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Robert Westrobert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Why horizontal polarity? Cause I'm a total idiot when it comes to 900mhz
and as my luck usually runs, if I go by the book nothing works until I do
what I'm not
Folks like horizontal for 900 MHz due to the size of the wave cycle approx
13 inches long
--
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:02 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz
It appears that only SOME of the Ubiquiti products enable compression fast
frames, some don't. Is this accurate? Any success stories using the WRT
firmware on these products?
It seems that the hardware is capable, just hasn't been enabled in the firmware
unless you purchase the higher end,
I believe the processor is different between something like a NanoStation 5
(no SuperAG) and PowerStation 5 (Super AG). I could be wrong, but that's
how I remember it.
We have absolutely no problems with the UBNT equipment. Install it, and
forget it.
Jayson
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:42 AM,
I have no doubt that the equipment is good. My specific question was about
the equipment and whether or not it's a software or hardware thing. I've
heard that you can load Open WRT on it and then you get those features.
Fast Frames and Compression are what give us the performance increase per
I know that with DDWRT, you have to pay for the license and you get a key.
Not sure about OpenWRT.
I don't recall any current UBNT I have used that did not support ff and
comp. I have used most, except for the newest that just came out.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From:
And the fact that most interference sources are vertical!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Rice
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz question
Folks like
yep excellent point
--
From: ralph ralphli...@bsrg.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 1:37 PM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz question
And the fact that most interference sources are vertical!
Oh- you must be using Ligowave (ducking)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:37 AM
To: t...@telescience.net; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz question
Why
Well now that's not very nice
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 14:43 -0400, ralph wrote:
Oh- you must be using Ligowave (ducking)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:37 AM
Hey Harold. Good to see you on this list.
--
From: Harold Bledsoe hbled...@deliberant.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:09 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz question
Well now that's not very nice
Exactly! But the wife never listens to that explanation of why I have to
redo it again after the fourth or fifth time.
Never let someone tell you it cant be done because even out of failure
lessons are learned.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
It's not the size of the wave cycle, it's how you use it. Or something like
that.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Rice
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
But does not practice make perfect
Richard
2009/9/2 Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
It's not the size of the wave cycle, it's how you use it. Or something
like
that.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
According to Ubiquiti, these DO support ff comp:
Nanostation 5
Nanostation Loco 5
Bullet 2 HP
Picostation 2 HP
All powerstations
All others do not, including:
Nanostation 2
Nanostation Loco 2
Bullet 2 (non-HP...WTF???)
Bullet5
Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
Bob,
no matter what I do it will never work the first time
LOL, but actually you hit the nail on the head on that comment. No one can
conculsively predict an unknown environment. The odds are 50/50 one will
guess right.
In my mind thats the biggest advantage of Dual Pol sectors for towers,
I figured I would wake you up lol
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 3:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz question
Well now that's not very nice
Mark,
It appears that is correct. I also run StarOS AP's. Interesting
though, I have not seen any performance differences between the units
with ff comp and those that dont support it. I wonder if its just
something you cant view?
-RickG
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Mark
The wave size of vertical would be different? -RickG
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Paul
Ricepaul.r...@boomerang-networks.com wrote:
Folks like horizontal for 900 MHz due to the size of the wave cycle approx
13 inches long
--
From: RickG
I've got two customers on a 900MHz AP RB-433/XR9 running Mikrotik
3.10, with a 13db v-pol omni.
Customer 1 has RB-411/XR9 running Mikrotik 3.10, with a 18db grid. 1
mile of solid trees. Signal is -85. Noise floor = -102.
Customer 2 has RB-411/XR9 running Mikrotik 3.10 with a 15db yagi. 1/4
mile
LOL, I can identify! -RickG
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Robert Westrobert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Exactly! But the wife never listens to that explanation of why I have to
redo it again after the fourth or fifth time.
Never let someone tell you it can’t be done because even out of
same size. The electromagnetic wave is the same, polarity refers to the
orientation of the wave. up and down or side to side.
13 inches is the wavelength (length of a single cycle).
--
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Paul
Ricepaul.r...@boomerang-networks.com wrote:
Folks like horizontal for 900 MHz due to the size of the wave cycle approx
13 inches long
I knew that but couldnt figure out why you specified horizontal. I
guess you might have said Folks like 900 MHz due to the
Obama Man can...
http://www.youtube.com/v/zhhkF3dqXR0
Can't wait for 2012
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan
He'll have to pry my radios from my cold, dead fingers! What I cant
figure out is why we are giving this guy so much power?
At any rate, the comments are interesting:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/comments/
-RickG
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at
heh, the question was why folks doing 900 preferred horizontal
--
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:41 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz question
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at
Wasn't the internet made for the exact opposite of what this bill is trying
to give him power to due?
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf
Actually Internet wasn't really made for anything. If you want to tie it to
any one thing, commercial purposes was the primary focus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you
Exactly! One of the best reasons to have the Internet is to hack (with free
speech) the government.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:02 PM
Wasn't the internet made for the exact opposite of what this bill is trying
to give him power
I thought it was to watch funny cat videos on YouTube. Have I been wrong on
this???
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Frank
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:58 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Senate
For the last couple of years, that's how it has been. Took us more
then a decade getting everything prepared for the lolcats though!
On 9/3/09, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
I thought it was to watch funny cat videos on YouTube. Have I been wrong on
this???
-Original
44 matches
Mail list logo
