*shrugs* ComboFix?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: heith petersen wi...@mncomm.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 4:54:13 PM
Subject: [WISPA] youtube down
I had
What do you mean by fired up authentication?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Date:02/08/2014 1:30 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] youtube down
Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of
these frequencies.
Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that
platform.
First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about
40% of our equipment deployed would render them
We're having voice issues on our wireless network, specifically with voice
quality, and we are looking for suggestions on how to tag specific vlans with
COS (of 6) before they enter my RAD HBS. The complaints are primarily for
static and sometimes choppy calls. We know that it's likely a voice
DFS always comes second due to a longer certification process. It'll eventually
come. Some manufacturers seem to get approved more quickly, but that could be
timing of announcements and not the actual certification process.
-50 dBm? Where? Where? I do see where your address is and I am
The new NanoBeams will support DFS, they are just pending approval.
Compliance Test - do you really want to go down that road? So what you just
said, in a public forum, is that 40% of your radios are running illegally on
frequencies they are not authorized to be on.
Please pack up and go
People running on those TDWR frequencies like that without proper
configuration are ruining the Unlimited Gain Antenna rule in the 5.8GHz
band. It is before the FCC right now and WISPA just held a manufacturer's
webinar about it. Every dish 2'+ would be affected, and would not be
allowed any
Chuck,
Do you have a link or any information to what the FCC is specifically
discussing?
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 8, 2014, at 18:48, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
People running on those TDWR frequencies like that without proper
configuration are ruining the Unlimited Gain Antenna
Yeah, I'd let someone official provide something. I wouldn't want to try to
discern public information from internal information.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
To:
*Revision of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Unlicensed
National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in the 5 GHz band, ET
Docket No. 13-49.*
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.netwrote:
Yeah, I'd let someone official provide
Chuck has it right. See below.
33.
Antenna Gain. Under Section 15.247, the assumed antenna gain is 6 dBi, with a 1
dBÂ
reduction in power required for every 1 dB that the antenna gain exceeds 6 dBi.
For fixed point-to-pointÂ
systems, no power reduction is required. Section 15.407 assumes the
I realize that many here hate the Cisco word, but all their radios are DFS
compliant.
John
-Original Message-
From: Art Stephens [mailto:asteph...@ptera.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 08:29 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700
I realize that many here hate the Cisco word, but all their radios are DFS
compliant.
John
-Original Message-
From: Art Stephens [mailto:asteph...@ptera.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 08:29 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700
13 matches
Mail list logo
