I realize that many here hate the Cisco word, but all their radios are DFS compliant.
John >-----Original Message----- >From: Art Stephens [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 08:29 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies? > >Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of >these frequencies. >Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that >platform. >First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about >40% of our equipment deployed would render them unusable since 5735 - 5840 >runs at - 50dBm or higher noise levels in our area, >Second is new product released only supports 5735 - 5840. >Seems like DFS is such a pain that manufacturers do not want to mess with >it. >Case in point the new NanoBeam M series only support 5725-5850 for USA. >Worldwide version which we are not allowed to buy or deploy supports >5170-5875. > >Seems the only alternative is to go with licensed P2MP which makes more >money for the FCC and drives the cost of wireless internet up for both >wisps and consumers. > >-- >Arthur Stephens >Senior Networking Technician >Ptera Inc. >PO Box 135 >24001 E Mission Suite 50 >Liberty Lake, WA 99019 >509-927-7837 >ptera.com >facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >"This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and is >intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed. >Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or >opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not >intended to represent those of the company." > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
