Chuck has it right. See below.
33.
Antenna Gain. Under Section 15.247, the assumed antenna gain is 6 dBi, with a 1
dB
reduction in power required for every 1 dB that the antenna gain exceeds 6 dBi.
For fixed point-to-point
systems, no power reduction is required. Section 15.407 assumes the same
antenna gain of 6 dBi, with 1
dB reduction in power required for every 1 dB that gain exceeds 6 dBi. For
fixed point-to-point systems,
a 1 dB reduction in power is required for every 1 dB that gain exceeds 23 dBi.
The only difference
between the two rule parts is the maximum antenna gain that can be deployed
without a penalty in
transmitter power. We propose to apply the more stringent 23 dBi maximum
antenna gain that is
currently required under Section 15.407. We believe that using the more
stringent antenna gain
requirement will ensure that there is no increase in the potential for
interference from unlicensed devices
operating under the new combined rule parts.
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 7:32 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
Revision of Part 15 of the Commission’s Rules to Permit Unlicensed National
Information
Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in the 5 GHz band, ET Docket No. 13-49.
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah, I'd let someone official provide something. I wouldn't want to try to
discern public information from internal information.
>
>
>
>
>
>-----
>Mike Hammett
>Intelligent Computing Solutions
>http://www.ics-il.com
>
>>________________________________
>
>From: "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]>
>To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2014 6:03:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies?
>
>
>
>Chuck,
>Do you have a link or any information to what the FCC is specifically
>discussing?
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On Feb 8, 2014, at 18:48, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>People running on those TDWR frequencies like that without proper
>configuration are ruining the Unlimited Gain Antenna rule in the 5.8GHz band.
>It is before the FCC right now and WISPA just held a manufacturer's webinar
>about it. Every dish 2'+ would be affected, and would not be allowed any
>longer. No more 20-30 Mile 5GHz links. I truly hope you are not running your
>equipment inappropriately.
>>
>>
>>Ubiquiti already has DFS certified gear, they are VERY familiar with the
>>process, and they typically produce DFS options on their 5GHz platform.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Chuck
>>
>>
>>On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Matt Hoppes <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>The new NanoBeams will support DFS, they are just pending approval.
>>>
>>>
>>>Compliance Test - do you really want to go down that road? So what you just
>>>said, in a public forum, is that 40% of your radios are running illegally on
>>>frequencies they are not authorized to be on.
>>>
>>>
>>>Please pack up and go home.
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>On Jan 31, 2014, at 11:29, Art Stephens <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of
>>>these frequencies.
>>>>Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that
>>>>platform.
>>>>First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about
>>>>40% of our equipment deployed would render them unusable since 5735 - 5840
>>>>runs at - 50dBm or higher noise levels in our area,
>>>>Second is new product released only supports 5735 - 5840.
>>>>Seems like DFS is such a pain that manufacturers do not want to mess with
>>>>it.
>>>>Case in point the new NanoBeam M series only support 5725-5850 for USA.
>>>>Worldwide version which we are not allowed to buy or deploy supports
>>>>5170-5875.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Seems the only alternative is to go with licensed P2MP which makes more
>>>>money for the FCC and drives the cost of wireless internet up for both
>>>>wisps and consumers.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>Arthur Stephens
>>>>Senior Networking Technician
>>>>Ptera Inc.
>>>>PO Box 135
>>>>24001 E Mission Suite 50
>>>>Liberty Lake, WA 99019
>>>>509-927-7837
>>>>
>>>>ptera.com
>>>>facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>"This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and is
>>>>intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed.
>>>>Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or
>>>>opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not
>>>>intended to represent those of the company."
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>Wireless mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Wireless mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>>Wireless mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Wireless mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wireless mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
