RE: [WISPA] Novel way to reach Canopy Cluster on pole

2006-10-02 Thread Rick Smith
image not found

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ralph Fowler
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 4:34 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Novel way to reach Canopy Cluster on pole

What to do when the cluster is too high for a ladder?
I'll bet some of you can figure out what this is g

http://ralphfowler.com/climb_to_cluster.jpg

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Novel way to reach Canopy Cluster on pole

2006-10-02 Thread Brian Rohrbacher

same here

Rick Smith wrote:


image not found

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ralph Fowler
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 4:34 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Novel way to reach Canopy Cluster on pole

What to do when the cluster is too high for a ladder?
I'll bet some of you can figure out what this is g

http://ralphfowler.com/climb_to_cluster.jpg

 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Diagnosing interference

2006-10-02 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

I use a spectrum analyzer.  It's for rent too :-).

EC also has a very nice portable unit (much easier to use) that's available 
for rent.  Or they have them for sale if you're looking for something to 
keep.


I used to use some tools from teletronics but the new version isn't nearly 
as good.  If you just need something that'll give you a ballpark reading 
they do work better than nothing.


Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Mike Ireton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 11:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Diagnosing interference





In our neck of the woods we have some areas where 802.11 systems simply do 
not function, period (and this is across a range of frequency bands and 
equipment manufacturers). And sometimes, in some limited cases, we will 
have a sub who appears to be experiencing interference that is much louder 
than our rssi at the sub (say they have a -63, but they still can't 
reliably hear the ap well enough for communication) and there's nothing 
really obvious in the area we can see. We know it's radio interference 
because we can play the channel flipping game, but we'd like to be better 
than that and actually diagnose the problem and identify the source and 
direction of the transmitter creating the problem, so that we can plan 
better and actually provide a resolution that will last for that sub.


We know about spectrum analysis and such and actually own a handy unit 
(the Spectran) but it doesn't give real time data useful for direction 
finding. What are some of the other tools (hand held or truck mounted, not 
built-in firmware features) you folks use for this? If we had a tool that 
would just give us knowledge about the non-household applications present 
in these areas (where non-household is anything with a larger gain antenna 
and/or power output than a cordless phone or wireless access point), we 
could even go so far as to try and coordinate with those applications for 
the betterment of everyone. But just waking up one morning and learning a 
long time customer now has an Interference problem you have no way to 
resolve other than by terminating the business relationship, just really 
sucks ass in my opinion. And when you run out of tricks like new antennas, 
equipment, alignments and such, that's exactly what you're left with.




Mike-


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Novel way to reach Canopy Cluster on pole

2006-10-02 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

dead page for me.

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Ralph Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 1:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Novel way to reach Canopy Cluster on pole



What to do when the cluster is too high for a ladder?
I'll bet some of you can figure out what this is g

http://ralphfowler.com/climb_to_cluster.jpg

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik AP/Ubiquiti SR9 Tranzeo CPE 900 MHz

2006-10-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
Take note there could be some advantage in using the radio which fully 
utilizes the lowest part of the band.
The farther one can stay away from 930 as possible (paging guys), is a good 
thing.
Trango uses full 6Mhz to maximize full use of band, but if limited to only 5 
Mhz, I'd throw away the end portion first.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Mark Nash - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:27 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik AP/Ubiquiti SR9  Tranzeo CPE 900 MHz


Can't get an association from the Tranzeo 900 MHz CPE to the Mikrotik 
RB532 with the SR9 card.


I can associate with the Tranzeo 900 MHz AP immediately.

The only thing that I see that could be causing the problem is the channel 
table is off.


The Ubiquiti card has this:

922 MHz
917 MHz
912 MHz
907 MHz

The Tranzeo AP shows this:

923 MHz
918 MHz
913 MHz
908 MHz

I've got them both set to 5 MHz channel widths.

I've looked for a couple hours now and I can't see where to change the 
frequency tables on either product (like you can on the Trango).


Has anyone gotten this scenario to work?

Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] FW: NY Times broadband article

2006-10-02 Thread chris cooper

Don't know if anyone posted this or not.
Interesting trend - ilecs selling off landline services in rural areas
to
smaller, less capitalized companies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/technology/28vermont.html?ex=115967520
0en




-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/458 - Release Date:
9/27/2006


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FW: NY Times broadband article

2006-10-02 Thread Peter R.
Actually they are attempting to sell off rural assets that they don't 
want to operate any more to rural ILECs, like CenturyTel.


chris cooper wrote:


Don't know if anyone posted this or not.
Interesting trend - ilecs selling off landline services in rural areas
to
smaller, less capitalized companies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/technology/28vermont.html?ex=115967520
0en

 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Legal insight?

2006-10-02 Thread Patrick Leary
This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477 and do we really need to file it?
- Does CALEA affect me? How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?
- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?
- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?
- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?
- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?
- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything? How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?
- What the deal with the TV bands?
- Are there realistic options for WISPs to get licensed bands? 
- Do I have to cooperate with other area WISP?
- Is there such a thing as malicious interference?
- Does any other WISP or operator have any priority over me with
unlicensed bands?
- When should an STA be asked for and what uses are prohibited with
STA's?
- What are the biggest gotchas when entering into a site acquisition
lease?
- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an externally
mounted antenna?



Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer 
viruses.




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?

2006-10-02 Thread Blair Davis

Comments in-line

Patrick Leary wrote:


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477 and do we really need to file it?
 

Break this into 2 parts  


- What good is Form 477  Rate as a 1
 (Why) do we really need to file it?  Rate as a 1



- Does CALEA affect me? How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?
 


rate as 10


- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?
 


Rate as 3


- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?
 


Rate as 3


- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?
 


Rate as 3


- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?
 


rate as 10


- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything? How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?
 


Rate as 3


- What the deal with the TV bands?
 


Rate as 1

- Are there realistic options for WISPs to get licensed bands? 
 


Rate as 5


- Do I have to cooperate with other area WISP?
 


Rate as 5


- Is there such a thing as malicious interference?
 


Rate as 1


- Does any other WISP or operator have any priority over me with
unlicensed bands?
 


Rate as 1


- When should an STA be asked for and what uses are prohibited with
STA's?
 





- What are the biggest gotchas when entering into a site acquisition
lease?
 


rate as 5


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an externally
mounted antenna?
 


Rate as 1




Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer 
viruses.




 




--
Blair Davis

AOL IM Screen Name --  Theory240

West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648

A division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Diagnosing interference

2006-10-02 Thread Mac Dearman
Mike,

  I use a Motorola Canopy 2.4 SM to check for interference issues. It is a
poor mans SA, but it does show you what you are looking for and it does it
real time as well with a pretty nice interface.

Mac



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Ireton
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 2:45 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Diagnosing interference

Ralph Fowler wrote:
 Spectran?  Are you talking about the software for a PC sound card?
 That's not going to do what you want, for sure!
 There really isn't a cheap solution.
 
 

We have an expensive hand held unit, looks like an alien ray gun, that 
does a range of 0 - 6ghz with down to 1mhz resolution per step. The 
problems are not enough resolution (can't see any difference between 
-80dbm and -60dbm, or at least, not without a lot of time consuming 
tweeking and such), and no real-time sweeping capabillity, making a 
complete pass take too long for direction finding activities (or at 
least, for my reletive level of inexperience).

What I'd want, I think, is a crt with the wavy lines updated in near 
real time, in a hand held unit I can take into the field and really see 
what and where things are. I don't care too much about formallities, I'd 
just like to see that, yes, there's a -37 between 2454 and 2459mhz and 
that's why this link isn't working.

There were a few units from Berkeley Varitronics that we were 
considering at one point, but unfortunately we couldn't be permitted to 
receive a live demonstration and so that $4,000 sale had to be postponed 
indefinately because we don't buy expensive equipment we're not 
permitted to try out first. And that's too bad because they really do 
seem to have some quite useful field testing equipment more tuned and 
designed for wisp field use than the generic spectrum analysis tools 
previously mentioned.

Mike-

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.11/460 - Release Date: 10/1/2006


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Find the Fastest ISP

2006-10-02 Thread Sam Tetherow
I found this article catching up on Cranky Geeks (www.crankygeeks.com) 
it is a bit old (from early August), but I don't remember anyone posting it.


http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1994566,00.asp

Those of you in Qwest territory might find it especially useful information.

...On the other end of the scale, Qwest was, by far, the slowest ISP; 
its DSL service averaged only 109 Kbps on the SurfSpeed test...


   Sam Tetherow
   Sandhills Wireless
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Find the Fastest ISP

2006-10-02 Thread Travis Johnson
This is one of the worst speed test programs I have ever seen. It 
basically downloads the front web page from several different sites 
(apple.com, msn.com, microsoft.com, yahoo.com, etc.) and times each 
download, and then averages them.


My PC at work is a P4/2.8ghz with 1GB of RAM. I am connected to our 
backbone switch with a 100Mbps ethernet connection. Our backbone router 
has two full DS3's running full BGP routes. Even when I have over 50Mbps 
of bandwidth available, the SurfSpeed test shows my average speed at 
35Kbps.


You can download the SurfSpeed program from PC Magazine's website and 
test it yourself.


Travis
Microserv


Sam Tetherow wrote:

I found this article catching up on Cranky Geeks (www.crankygeeks.com) 
it is a bit old (from early August), but I don't remember anyone 
posting it.


http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1994566,00.asp

Those of you in Qwest territory might find it especially useful 
information.


...On the other end of the scale, Qwest was, by far, the slowest ISP; 
its DSL service averaged only 109 Kbps on the SurfSpeed test...


   Sam Tetherow
   Sandhills Wireless


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Find the Fastest ISP

2006-10-02 Thread Jonathan Schmidt
Travis...you're too kind.

Agreed...geezy peezy, the latency, too, is awful in these tests.
If I test against my office (peer'd with RR) I get nearly 7Mbps...
but this stupid thing shows barely 1.  

My Akamai downloads of various updates show 5-6Mbps.

Somebody isn't doing their homework and they certainly should
be writing neither columns nor software.

. . . j o n a t h a n

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Find the Fastest ISP


This is one of the worst speed test programs I have ever seen. It 
basically downloads the front web page from several different sites 
(apple.com, msn.com, microsoft.com, yahoo.com, etc.) and times each 
download, and then averages them.

My PC at work is a P4/2.8ghz with 1GB of RAM. I am connected to our 
backbone switch with a 100Mbps ethernet connection. Our backbone router 
has two full DS3's running full BGP routes. Even when I have over 50Mbps 
of bandwidth available, the SurfSpeed test shows my average speed at 
35Kbps.

You can download the SurfSpeed program from PC Magazine's website and 
test it yourself.

Travis
Microserv


Sam Tetherow wrote:

 I found this article catching up on Cranky Geeks (www.crankygeeks.com) 
 it is a bit old (from early August), but I don't remember anyone 
 posting it.

 http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1994566,00.asp

 Those of you in Qwest territory might find it especially useful 
 information.

 ...On the other end of the scale, Qwest was, by far, the slowest ISP; 
 its DSL service averaged only 109 Kbps on the SurfSpeed test...

Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/