I have to attend a meeting tomorrow and need some real world experience
on wimax and mesh.
--
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
Ping?
Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know your
feelings about allowing advertisements on the free WISPA lists. The current
Board is taking this under consideration at this
Larry Yunker wrote:
Ping?
Pong
Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know your
feelings about allowing advertisements on the free WISPA lists. The current
Board is taking this
Thought the list might like to see CWA's idea of reporting the FCC form 477.
Additional info would be tiers of users, number of homes passed, speed
tests, number of users by Zip +4, speed tests and a host of other goodies.
Seems like CWA wants market research to find out size of Broadband
I'm not sure who CWA is, but the current measurements of broadband
availability are just about worthless.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Don Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List'
I'm not sure who CWA is, but the current measurements of broadband
availability are just about worthless.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Don Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List'
Most of this has been hashed over before, but there are two problems I
see with their suggestions.
First every communications company would be giving away essential
customer information if they had to report customers by zip or even
worse zip+4 along with speeds of those customers, especially
Don Renner wrote:
Thought the list might like to see CWA's idea of reporting the FCC form 477.
Additional info would be tiers of users, number of homes passed, speed
tests, number of users by Zip +4, speed tests and a host of other goodies.
Most of us will, I suspect, agree with the statement
Carl, Regarding your question, my understanding is a
few of us wireless practioneers blog on various wimax
sites in relation to WISP and enterprise. My subject
matter expertise relates to utility applicaitons and
munis. Many of these sectors are evaluating WiMax and
WiFi for certain mobile and
Mike,
CWA is Communication Workers of America a very aggressive union.
Here is main website
http://www.cwa-union.org/
Subsidiary website for wireless (focus is primarily cell/telephone companies
http://www.wirelessworker.org/
Don Renner
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone confirm 232,000 WiMAX customers for Clearwire? I could
believe total customers, but I would think that the majority of those
would be using NextNet equipment and not WiMax.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Felix A. Lopez wrote:
Carl, Regarding your question, my understanding is a
Good question Sam, up here it's all NextNet so it sounds to me, more journalism
that is erroneous.
-Dee
Alaska Wireless Systems
1(907)240-2183 Cell
1(907)349-2226 Fax
1(907)349-4308 Office
www.akwireless.net
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
W.D.McKinney wrote:
Good question Sam, up here it's all NextNet so it sounds to me, more journalism
that is erroneous.
-Dee
What happens is that terms take on very general meanings to garner key
word, alerts, and other RSS and subscription views.
Wireless is used even when they are
Sam: I'm interested in verifying those statistics too
because my understanding is the WIMax Plugfests are
still going on and most of the equipment being
installed is preWiMax: albeit in the 802.16 (d)
flavor. I will post to the www.wimax.com blog and
find out. I know many of the guys on the
Actually, 802.16d gear has been out there for a while now in WiMAX Forum
certified versions (our .16d was certified two years ago). The plugfests you
see going today are for 802.16e products, but the actual 16.e certification
waves do not start until early next year. Our commercially selling
Error from my post...
The line: ... we are selling both .16d and .16d WiMAX products in commercial
volumes. Should read: ... we are selling both .16d and .16e WiMAX products in
commercial volumes.
Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pfft... union. I can't believe I just agreed with a union.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Don Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:21 PM
Subject: RE:
Pat, there is a good write up about Alvarion on
www.wimax.com blog by a Mr. Orr.
Felix
--- Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, 802.16d gear has been out there for a
while now in WiMAX Forum certified versions (our
.16d was certified two years ago). The plugfests you
see going
Thanks Felix. So what is Jeff saying? (Got a direct link to the article?)
Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felix A. Lopez
Sent: Tuesday, July
This is too cool!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2QdEj8UjBc
marlon
Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know your
feelings about allowing advertisements on the free WISPA lists.
I spent quite a bit of time on the phone with the guy running this
particular show. He called to see if clarifying their stance would help to
garner our support.
After our roughly hour long phone call I have to tell you guys that I liked
him. And I liked what they are trying to do (this is
Aye, and cool also is the fact that DIRNSA paid BBN to do the development of
IP. Early Linux IP stacks still contained the copy rights. I think
they were removed
around the 2.4 kernel release.
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
This is too cool!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2QdEj8UjBc
marlon
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Their belief is that there are companies getting government moneys but
are NOT actually servicing the customer bases that they are being paid
to service. That's why they want the 477 data. To prove or disprove
who's stealing what.
Ver ... cough cough er...
Yes, that was 6 minutes and 51 seconds of time well-spent. Thanks!
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
This is too cool!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2QdEj8UjBc
marlon
Would you like to see your advertisement here?
I am in need of a switch (3, actually) that will allow me to prevent
all communications between ports (vlans), but will trunk the traffic
out an untagged port to the hotspot controller.
Any suggestions appreciated.
--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
Thank you everyone, now I guess it is time to sleep and see where we go
tomorrow.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
Patrick Leary wrote:
Thanks Felix. So what is Jeff saying? (Got a direct
To prevent broadcast traffic between ports in the same vlan, you can do
this using switchport protected in cisco catalyst 3550:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/12.1_4_ea1/configuration/guide/Swbcsup.html#wp1029319
Hope this helps
Mark
Butch Evans
HP Procurve
Netgear Managed switches
JT
Butch Evans wrote:
I am in need of a switch (3, actually) that will allow me to prevent
all communications between ports (vlans), but will trunk the traffic
out an untagged port to the hotspot controller.
Any suggestions appreciated.
I can confirm that Clearwire has approximately no actual customers
using WiMAX. Clearwire has done one experimental WiMAX deployment in
the Portland area; all the rest of their deployments are using NextNet
Wireless gear which is entirely proprietary, not WiMAX.
Clearwire wants to give the
29 matches
Mail list logo
