I have a customer that is needing a part time assistant. He is in
the Manor, TX area and being in that area would be considered a
big plus. What he needs is someone who understands Mikrotik very
well. He is using OSPF extensively, NAT is in several places as
well. He needs a self-starter wi
Dustin,
I appreciate your thoughtful post. I general, I can help WISPs get
equipment certified but 3650 is a little more difficult. The lab I work
with hasn't been too responsive on 3650 inquiries. I have a contact at
an alternate lab but I have not yet sounded them out regarding 3650. You
are
David,
In your haste to sell equipment you may have failed to understand that
the question was about availability of "unlicensed" equipmement. The
correct answer is that there is NO UNLICENSED 3650 OPERATION. All 3650
operation requires an FCC license.
jack
David Peterson wrote:
> Have them
Frank Muto wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, Barracuda makes a fine appliance and comparing them to a
> hosted solution with far greater processing
> power, 7 global data centers and 14 redundant systems, now with the strength
> of Google's cash and server farms, is two
> different things.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:59:38AM -0400, Frank Muto wrote:
>> That still puts pressure on the system resources. As a wireless
>> provider you have enough on your plate to deal with. Options
>> include, outsourcing email w
A while back Jack Unger explained how to get your product and antenna
through FCC licensing (Certified System). If you are doing this and you
have UBNT radio's then I believe he said that the costs of certification
could be less because you would only have to do a mini certification. I
also belie
David Peterson wrote:
> Have them contact me offlist. We carry the top WiMax manufacturers in
> 3.65GHz.
Unlicensed? Which vendors?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
Have them contact me offlist. We carry the top WiMax manufacturers in
3.65GHz.
David Peterson
WirelessGuys Inc.
805-578-8590
On 6/30/08 1:57 PM, "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone I know is looking for unlicensed wimax on 3.65 GHz.
>
> I told him I didn't know if that was available
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:59:38AM -0400, Frank Muto wrote:
> That still puts pressure on the system resources. As a wireless
> provider you have enough on your plate to deal with. Options
> include, outsourcing email with integrated spam/virus (AS/AV) with
> IMAP/POP3/Webmail options, or outsource
Update from the FCC. This makes is very clear to me what the FCC is looking
for, if there are any questions or comments feel free.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
"Tony:
Thank you for y
Tom
You are still thinking like an 802.11 only protocol :) I can see you have
your mind set, once things get closer to having real product then this would
be a more valuable thread, until then!
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 F
Hi Randy,
Yes, the LigoWave 900MHz products are all FCC certified.
-Matt
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 15:26 -0600, Randy Cosby wrote:
> Is their 900 mhz stuff fcc certified?
>
> Randy
>
>
> Bo Ring wrote:
> > LigoWave is planning one, but has not announced any details. This is
> > from their websi
Is their 900 mhz stuff fcc certified?
Randy
Bo Ring wrote:
> LigoWave is planning one, but has not announced any details. This is
> from their website:
>
> LigoPTP devices provide high throughput, Point-to-Point connectivity
> for backhaul applications on a variety of frequencies. With LigoWav
Tom DeReggi wrote:
>> WISPs need to be able to deploy 10 megabit plus pipes to the home.
>>
>
>
>
> People's 25 Mhz 3650 now becomes 45Mhz, when they combine 2155 with 3650.
>
What is 2155? This is the second mention I have seen of it (both are on
this thread). Google doesn't turn up much
I have no idea how the Cuda works, so it may do some of these. It could
(SHOULD) make sure that the email to be delivered is to a valid email on the
system, make sure that the domain to be sent from is a valid domain, make
sure the domain or IP is not listed in the RBL's, etc... All this can be
don
That wold require the whole park to be wifi enabled, wouldn't a portable
3g/gps type of thing would be more reliable?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
The other thought I might have would be to give each kid an RFID tag,
and then strategically set up the RFID readers throughout the park.
I can also think of lots of interesting data you could gather as a theme
park owner about patron habits if each was carrying a RFID tag...
-forrest
Rogelio
Frank Muto wrote:
> Outbound is not as much trouble, unless of course a customer has a virus,
> than inbound. Just how would the Cuda box do any
> checks without receiving a message? You still have all those connections
> coming in, so the problem still exists.
About 90% of our email is stopped
Roger,
I'm not an expert but you are basically "on the mark". Ekahau or other
location-based systems should be able to track children if the children
are wearing active Wi-Fi tags.
jack
Rogelio wrote:
> On a conference call today, someone asked if I knew of a solution that a
> large theme pa
On a conference call today, someone asked if I knew of a solution that a
large theme park chain might use to locate missing children.
(Not really knowing the market, I (off the cuff) suggested they look at
Ekahau. But I told them that wasn't my thing and that I'd have to
connect them with some
Good point
Unlicensed 3.65 does not exist,
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:28 PM
To: [E
> WISPs need to be able to deploy 10 megabit plus pipes to the home.
No they don't.
WISPs need to deploy 10mbps pipes to homes in order to compete equally with
Cable Cos and RBOCs.
I serve many neighborhoods today, with 900Mhz inteference haven, and they
are glad I'm there.
30% of America sti
Tony,
>Real throughput requires that much
> per sector."
That is incorrect. It requires that much per sector when the sector is a
wide beam PtMP sector, and when there is tons of interference because the
band is shared by many.
If one provider controls 20Mhz, spectrum reuse can be engineered ve
What is "unlicensed 3.65"?
I have a license.
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:57 AM
Subject: [WISPA] unlic wimax on 3.65
> Someone I know is looking for unlicensed wimax on 3.65 GHz.
>
> I told him I didn't
You must have a license to operate in 3.65 in America.
On Jun 30, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Rogelio wrote:
Someone I know is looking for unlicensed wimax on 3.65 GHz.
I told him I didn't know if that was available (but hadn't looked).
Does anyone else have any comments or experience on this?
-
Someone I know is looking for unlicensed wimax on 3.65 GHz.
I told him I didn't know if that was available (but hadn't looked).
Does anyone else have any comments or experience on this?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
LigoWave is planning one, but has not announced any details. This is
from their website:
LigoPTP devices provide high throughput, Point-to-Point connectivity
for backhaul applications on a variety of frequencies. With LigoWave's
proprietary software mechanism utilizing Selective Repeat ARQ
I've been very pleased with ModusMail/Gate (www.vircom.com). Great products
and very effective. I'm running modusMail for my primary server and
modusGate for filtering some business MS Exchange customers.
WISPA
I think we had a thread on this awhile back, maybe not, but is there anyone
offering a 3650 PtP product? Is there enough interest in this to maybe
prompt a manf. to get busy on this? For me, I need a move my backhauls out
of the messy and noisy 5ghz and this would be ideal. I don't have any shor
But that's the million dollar question. Will the FCC approve it if it
is not 802.11y? I read somewhere that the FCC was waiting for 802.11y
to be approved before authorizing equipment in the upper part of the
3.65 band.
Otherwise, yes it is technically possible to implement this with atheros
bas
We are looking into this now, it looks like it can all me done in the
MAC/HAL the way the spec is done but it's still a wait and see. We are
looking at ways to do more of a pre-802.11y, as long as it passes the FCC
muster we are good.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless So
Outbound is not as much trouble, unless of course a customer has a virus, than
inbound. Just how would the Cuda box do any
checks without receiving a message? You still have all those connections coming
in, so the problem still exists.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Scottie Arn
Scottie Arnett wrote:
> Cheap P3 700Mhz Dell, Install Debian with Postfix, MailScanner, Spamassassin,
> Razor, Dcc, Pyzor, Clamav, and a few choice others if you wish. Have it relay
> to your internal mail server, and have internal not receive any email except
> from Debian box. Make sure you ha
Eric Merkel wrote:
> We use the barracuda's and are gennerrally happy with the performance .
> We're running 500K plus thru a pair of 400's. We have had performance issues
> at times but if you pay for their instant replacement they'll swap out your
> hardware. What I find somewhat bogus is the
The barracuda should do all the checks it can before the bandwidth is every
used. If its not, ditch it and go with the setup I mentioned earlier. There are
many checks that can be done to verify a legit email before it ever leaves the
sending email server to consume any bandwidth.
Scott
--
A friend and I are looking into the future of 802.11y as well as vendors
who support it.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this in either of these two areas?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
Mike
It is a bit too early to say right now, once the MAC is done we will have a
better idea.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
Cheap P3 700Mhz Dell, Install Debian with Postfix, MailScanner, Spamassassin,
Razor, Dcc, Pyzor, Clamav, and a few choice others if you wish. Have it relay
to your internal mail server, and have internal not receive any email except
from Debian box. Make sure you have a way to transfer all legit
I look at it this way, usage is up and there is more junk coming in now than
pre-2003 and even more so from 2005. Broadband
speeds and increased PC horse power, are allowing faster access for the
customer, but also for the spammer/hacker.
IMO, for anyone using Wi-Fi and also VOIP, taking the no
This is an age old argumentkeep it inhouse or outsource ?
Outsource works very well as long as you have the right kind of (good match)
outsource partner, and in-house works well is you are looking for full
control and have extra available manpower to spare.
Keep in mind that out-source does n
That still puts pressure on the system resources. As a wireless provider you
have enough on your plate to deal with. Options
include, outsourcing email with integrated spam/virus (AS/AV) with
IMAP/POP3/Webmail options, or outsource the AS/AV and take
the load off of your systems.
Your current
We use the barracuda's and are gennerrally happy with the performance .
We're running 500K plus thru a pair of 400's. We have had performance issues
at times but if you pay for their instant replacement they'll swap out your
hardware. What I find somewhat bogus is the 400 they sold us a couple y
I couldn't find a page that had this spec spelled out, and I'm sure once I
do see it, it'll be way too dry to keep my focus for more than 20 seconds.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISP
UPDATE
I just got done messing with that Untangled garbage. It has absolutely no
way to configure anything. It is basically setup so all you have to do is
plug it in line as a bridge and "hope" that it does what you want cause you
can't configure it for crap.
So back to the "cuda." I tell you tha
When will we see your equipment?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband In
45 matches
Mail list logo
