wow, this argument AGAIN?
Let's look at this closely...UBNT certified the XR3 - 3.7 as a
standalone module, and the FCC accepts their certification NO MATTER WHAT OS
OR DRIVERS CONTROL IT because it has been proven to not radiate outside of
the designated frequencies.I hold the license
Nonsense, Matt.
Read the grant yourself. The grant is MODULAR certification, meaning you
can use the module in any way you choose, so long as you lable the device as
containing blah blah and comply with the antenna rules. This is very
explicitly true.
I believe that UBNT has written
Yes both listed, Under neighboors
The problematic router has
State: ExStart
Adjency: (blank)
I would add that it has many state changes (2988) vs the working router
that has 5
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
Mark,
But those rules are under Part 90 and not Part 15. Two different sets of
rules as I recall. The 3.65 band is FCC Part 90 and the unlicensed bands are
not.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on
We are wanting to convert a 3 sector Karlnet tower over to a MT based
station.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to convert it with the least
amount of downtime for my customers.
Thanks,
Steve Nedolast
Does anyone here have a Hold Harmless Contract for a water tower or even a
tower in general? The owners of the water tower wants a hold harmless contract
in case something happens to the climber while on their property. I would
appreciate any help with this.
Build a new network right over the top of the old one. Then move customers
one at a time. When they are all moved (maybe one sector at a time?), take
down the old gear.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Steve Nedolast sy...@willard-oh.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May
MT equipment, Old Prisim radios, 2 sectors bridged at ap, entire network is
routed and bandwidth control on all served customers. Sometimes the site
gets congested and customers indicate that performance gets slow. approx
60-65 customers between the two sectors.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:12 AM,
Are there any updates to the broadband grants in the ARRA?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
http://broadbandcensus.com/2009/05/21st-spectrum-policy-should-include-map-experts-say/
http://broadbandcensus.com/2009/05/internet-providers-consumer-advocates-optimistic-on-internet-regulatory-outlook/
The answer depends on a number of factors:
Are you planning on running MT in 802.11b mode or in NStreme?
If you plan to run NStreme, you will need to change out all of your
Turbocell client radios and replace with MT clients.
If you plan to run 802.11b, you should be able to reuse many if not
Let me muddy the waters a bit more with an interesting thread:
http://ubnt.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8556highlight=fcc
"WTH" seems to be pretty knowledgeable and quotes chapter and verse to
back himself up. His arguments are largely based on the "professional
installation" rules in part-15.
In the old days of using Breezecom Pro.11 gear tweaking RTS helped heaps.
Generally setting RTS on the AP to 1600 and on the SM's at about 50 was the
trick. YMMV.
Matt
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
Don't assume that a hidden-node problem is the
What is the general opinion of the NetEqualizer NE2000?
Pros
Cons
What manufacture do you prefer?
Thanx
NGL
If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier!
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Yes but experiment with different thresholds on the SM's starting with
500 bytes instead of 50.
jack
Matt wrote:
In the old days of using Breezecom Pro.11 gear tweaking RTS helped heaps.
Generally setting RTS on the AP to 1600 and on the SM's at about 50 was the
trick. YMMV.
Matt
I got tired of seeing this weneedbroadband.com website coming up over
and over on Twitter and in press releases, especially since so many of
the places on their map already have access to WISPs. So I registered
http://www.wehavebroadband.com/ and pointed it to the WISP Directory.
Tell your
OK.. first off, I have to know where rabbtux rabbtux comes from.. I have
wondered that for years. :)
And on this page I try and explain RTS/CTS thresholds and how I changed
mine to improve my customers experience:
http://tranzeofaq.com/RTS-CTS.html
I hope this helps, feedback is appreciated.
That was really clever Matt! Way to think out of the box!
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Matt Larsen - Lists [mailto:li...@manageisp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:19 PM
To: WISPA General List; w...@part-15.org; Motorola Canopy User Group
Subject: [WISPA] weHAVEbroadband.com
I
I'm looking for some sort of small *nix friendly appliance that I can
put at the edge of certain wireless mesh networks.
That way, I can integrate some open source monitoring tools there and
test bandwidth / connectivity. Nothing fancy, just maybe the likes of
iperf or Nagios ncsa that can
Rogelio wrote:
I've heard good things about the Soekris boards, particularly from guys
in the BSD community. The problem is time and finances. I'm not sure
that this is the best sort of solution, given those constraints. But
it's one option.
The Soekris boards are basically low-end PCs,
I just tw[i|a|ee]ted about it. Hopefully that site can gain some popularity.
On 5/13/09 2:19 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com wrote:
I got tired of seeing this weneedbroadband.com website coming up over
and over on Twitter and in press releases, especially since so many of
the
David E. Smith wrote:
Rogelio wrote:
I've heard good things about the Soekris boards, particularly from guys
in the BSD community. The problem is time and finances. I'm not sure
that this is the best sort of solution, given those constraints. But
it's one option.
The Soekris
There isn't any great single solution. I ran this past our engineers
One size does not fit all... If I had a choice most of the time I would say
tcpspray. But it's not really a very user friendly application. It
requires a client and server(the routers can act as a server or client) to
test
We use the x86 embedded Alix boards from PC Engines - they have shown
outstanding performance and reliability in the field. The first couple of
pages of http://www.qorvus.com/downloads/QNODEJr_OWNERS_DOCUMENTATION.pdf
show photos of the Alix board with modular radios and the outdoor cabinet we
Let me add that broadbandcensus has been following the legilsation and
proceeding from day 1 (mid January) with daily updates. It has by far been
the best coverage overall.
Drew has done a wonderful job.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original
I've got my beads! Should I put them on both end of the cable?
-RickG
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
Yeah, the beads are amazing! We're starting to use them on almost all tower
installs.
Supposed to help with lightning too. Though we've not
Yes and on the data side on the poe as well. A total of 3 beads.
/Eje
CTO
WISP-Router, Inc.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:42:22
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Noise by me
27 matches
Mail list logo
