E rate purchases have to be approved 1-2 years ahead at times. They ask for
more than they need in many cases since they are not the ones paying the
bill.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 8:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] POE
> Can someone explain
ps
> at
> the lowest modulation.
>
> We plan to go live with the product this month... As soon as we get our
> routing situation fixed.
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I totally agree. I am planning to dep
I totally agree. I am planning to deploy 3.65 in this area and will be one
of the first if not the first. If there is a plethora of real life
experience with this band with the existing products, I am all ears. But so
far, I don't know of any actual "WiMax" 802.16d or e equipment deployments
ke Hammett"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Increased spectral efficiency
>> Advanced antenna support (the only benefit I understand is increased
>> signal
>> margin)
>> Higher likelihood of multiple vendors vs. many previous BWA technologies,
>>
Steel strap iron or Unistrut. Unistrut has lots of brackets and fasteners
but would not look as nice IMHO as a custom made strap steel unit. You
could always buy the 36 incher and have someone extend it. Yes, it will
lose some galvanizing but gray/silver paint will make up for the loss.
gt; building businesses solely for the purpose of selling it, nor about
> speculators who use leveraged debt to drive up the price of consumer
> commodities for no added value.
>
>
> ++++++++
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck Mc
ce. How you confuse this with normal buy/sell of real things and/or
> ownership of entities, I am not sure.
>
>
> ++++++++
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General
er out
> might be considered not-acceptable ("unethical") by others.
>
> Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
>> Then I guess the precludes any participation in any mutual fund or almost
>> any type of broker investments.
>> Oh well...
>> - Original Message -
&
amps up, the panels will be $1/watt.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WIS
lieve once production ramps up, the panels will be $1/watt.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL
3.65Ghz and CBP
> It does mine.
>
> Inflating the price of a needed commodity - that is, increasing it with no
> added value - is unethical, in my estimation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Chu
eir feedback?
>
> I could only see canopy 400 working on this bandthey could also port
> their wimax solution but thats a different price range
>
> gino
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1
; actively looking for options
>
>
> gino
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 2:28 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?
>
> Do you go solar where th
re paying about $.30
>
> gino
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; WISPA General List
>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?
>
>
I do not think that is in conflict with what you have deployed. Is
> Motorola planning to deploy a system for 3.65 GHz? I have not heard
> anything about that.
> Scriv
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Canopy
ng we need to get up to speed with
> the rest of the world on what has been accepted as the standard for
> broadband delivery over wireless in 3.4 thru 3.8 GHz bandspace.
> Scriv
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
I have been doing solar powered radio sites for 25 years. I will never do
one where commercial power is available. Not sure how folks buying panels
at $5/watt can think this is a good deal compared with 7 cents per 1000
watts.
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
What is your opinion about the greatness of WiMax based upon?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP
>I believe that WiMax is great... greate
n 3.65Ghz and CBP
>A lot of times, flipping a house is nothing more than putting on a fresh
> coat of paint.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck
Once upon a time, a man said that hell was full so they sent him to St. Geo.
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Cosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333 heat
> Ow, definitely don't want to install those here in
ook
> pretty sharp as well. I know the roughnecks around here poured some
> serious money into those holes they punched in the ground. I think they
> are pumping plenty of dollars back out now.
>
> chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
Hmmm, didn't realize flipping houses was an ethical gray area...
(gosh, buy a distressed property, gut and redo the kitchen and bathroom,
give it some landscaping- and make some dough. That is unethical? You know
some of the original colonies of the new world had rules against charging
interest
Personally, I really wonder if it is possible to have 10 bits/HZ that a 60
Mbps channel in 6 MHz would have. 8VSB of HDTV was pretty advanced when it
was originally proffered as a standard. It does 19.2 Mbps in a 6 MHz
channel. Or approx 3 bits / Hz. That seems to be the upper limit of many
syst
301 - 323 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
