Have you tested pseudobridge to achieve a similar affect without WDS?
-Original Message-
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net]
Sent: 28 April 2010 01:41
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Yes, WDS adds
Apr 2010 19:33:35 -0400
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Pseudobridge has tested to perform almost exactly the same as Station mode.
It does NOT have the same slowness side effects as WDS.
For us, it looks like
Yup... same here. OSPF does not work with anything but WDS.
Travis
Microserv
Justin Wilson wrote:
I have seen Pseudobridge on the Mikrotik side give OSPF issues. For the
customer side no issues. But with OSPF and pseudobridge you have duplicate
Mac addresses due to the nature of how it
Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hendry paul.hen...@skyline-networks.com
To: wireless wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Hey Tom,
Do you
3' and a metal enclosure.
grin
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Wow,
So my question would be, what sort
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
I'd love to see the same test with ubiquity XR cards
I've had such bad luck
' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Kurt,
I always put laminated foil between the cards. You able to try putting a
shield of aluminum foil between to see if that does anything useful?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:27 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
If anyone is like me and ever wondered how bad that stacking cards
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards
interfere?
I'd love to see the same test with ubiquity XR cards
I've had such bad luck with mikrotik's radio cards I don't use them any
more
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards
interfere?
I'd love to see the same test with ubiquity XR cards
I've had such bad luck with mikrotik's
Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
From what I have heard memory requirements are much
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs. Been very happy with them.
I do
: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs. Been very happy with them.
I do lose the speed test on the CPE, but it hasn't really been a big loss
compared to what I save (something like $215
On 26 April 2010 20:28, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
It seems to bridge ok, but I primarily NAT the customers.
I've read reports it doesn't carry OSPF packets right.
It seems to behave ok if you do WDS AP/WDS Client and enable Multicast.
, April 26, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs. Been very happy with them.
I do lose the speed test on the CPE, but it hasn't really been a big loss
compared to what I save (something like $215 to $70
OSPF does not like Proxy ARP, hence the WDS requirement. I have not
turned on multicast when doing this.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Jeremy Parr jeremyp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 April 2010 20:28, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
It seems to bridge ok, but I primarily NAT
On 04/26/2010 08:12 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Are you bridging at the AP and CPE, and does it work?
Something something that was brought to my attention is that UBQT has Iperf
built in at teh command line. So technically, if we used UBQT at the CPE and
MT as AP, we could still do speed tests
on 433AH? or RB800?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere
Um Yeah. Kinda thought the same thing...
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere
: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
FWIW...
The Ubiquiti Rocket M's are SBC, running Linux/ Open-wrt, and have the
following processor... on them...
-
Atheros MIPS 24KC, 400MHz
Memory Information 64MB SDRAM, 8MB Flash
- Original Message -
From: Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@backwoodswireless.net
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
On 04/26/2010 08:12 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Are you bridging at the AP and CPE
Message -
From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
I don't know about the newer M line but I know before that (speaking of
the NS, PS
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
From:
wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf
Of Blair Davis
Sent: Friday, April
23, 2010 10:27
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Ever wonder
how bad RB333
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ryan Spott
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 2:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad
Wow,
So my question would be, what sort of separation is required to keep the
noise down?
ryan
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote:
If anyone is like me and ever wondered how bad that stacking cards of the
same band in RB333 or RB433 interfere with each
] On
Behalf Of Ryan Spott
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 2:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Wow,
So my question would be, what sort of separation is required to keep the
noise down?
ryan
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:27
bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
If anyone is like me and ever wondered how bad that stacking cards of the
same band in RB333 or RB433 interfere with each other, well, I finally
answered my own question. I've been wondering this for the past 3 years and
no one could really give an answer
27 matches
Mail list logo
