oadband"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitions
>
>
> > Tom, not sure where that information is coming from. I have read Title
> > VI -
> > Broadband Communicat
St. Louis Broadband"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitions
> Tom, not sure where that information is coming from. I have read Title
> VI -
> Broadband Communications. This is the curr
Tom, not sure where that information is coming from. I have read Title VI -
Broadband Communications. This is the current text that has just been
passed by the House. Is it buried some where other than that or the RUS
portion?
Thanks,
Victoria
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
; - Original Message -
> From: "St. Louis Broadband"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitions
>
>
> > >
> >> The Senate bill asks for advanced b
correction (?) inline
Scottie Arnett wrote:
> For once I have to agree with Muddy here, they have no clue on what they are
> deciding on! I am NOT against the whole gov't intervention thing, but these
> people in the house and senate are completely lost! ALL they now is what the
> Lobbiest are
the text that was
>> written. But the lobby group that suggested the text certainly did.
>>
>> Tom DeReggi
>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>> From: "St. Louis Broadband
ainly did.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "St. Louis Broadband"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:45 PM
> Subj
Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "St. Louis Broadband"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitions
> >
>> The Senate bill asks for advanced broadba
ed Sentate bill.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "St. Louis Broadband"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:49 PM
> Subject: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadba
WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitions
>I don't know if this will be revised before it is voted on, but it appears
> that it needs to be corrected:
> In Title VI - BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS (pg 661-662)
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/08/senate-stimulus-b
> I do not understand why this is going under the NTIA umbrella rather
> than
> RUS. Any ideas on that?
>
Yes. They didn't want Rural advocates to take all the money. Plus, RBOC
want all the money for "next generation" fiber to the home, in more
profitable areas to serve than rural.
Also, its
nced WIRELESS broadband service 3/1
>>
>> But nothing stating what Basic Wireless broadband service is
>> supposed to be
>> at least in the excerpt.
>>
>> /Eje
>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From
less Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "St. Louis Broadband"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:49 PM
Subject: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitions
>I don't know if this will be revised before it is voted on, but it appears
> that it needs to be
is supposed to be
> at least in the excerpt.
>
> /Eje
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Unger
>
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:00:21
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitio
Unger
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:00:21
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Stimulus bill Broadband Definitions
So it looks like the definitions of "Basic broadband service" and
"Advanced broadband service" are interchanged. Good catch!!
St. Louis Broadband wrot
So it looks like the definitions of "Basic broadband service" and
"Advanced broadband service" are interchanged. Good catch!!
St. Louis Broadband wrote:
> I don't know if this will be revised before it is voted on, but it appears
> that it needs to be corrected:
> In Title VI - BROADBAND COMMUNIC
I don't know if this will be revised before it is voted on, but it appears
that it needs to be corrected:
In Title VI - BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS (pg 661-662)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/08/senate-stimulus-bill-full_n_163144.html
(j)
DEFINITIONS - for the purpose of this section - (1) the
17 matches
Mail list logo