; Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Lonnie Nunweiler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance
> No, not 48V yet. We are very h
ay, September 05, 2006 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance
No, not 48V yet. We are very happy with the current stuff, especially
since they handle 2 SR9 and 2 WLM54 cards. Any power supply gets a
lot of testing by me before I commit to it. I only change when there
is a good reason and simpl
As I said we are using 9 dB, 11 dB and 13 dB yagis. We are in test
mode so we are trying all of them for all locations so that we can
find the best combination for the task.
I am not at the point yet where I can give advice for which type to
use for a certain task. There are still combinations
No, not 48V yet. We are very happy with the current stuff, especially
since they handle 2 SR9 and 2 WLM54 cards. Any power supply gets a
lot of testing by me before I commit to it. I only change when there
is a good reason and simply because there is a new power supply is not
a good reason.
Lo
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
We run from
24V solar, so the voltage goes from 21V to 28V depending on state of
charge and battery.
Lonnie
Are the 533 boards rated for 48 volts yet?
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.o
I've been holding off on the SR9's till I heard more and lonnie has had
time to figure out what changes need to be made.
Also I'm waiting on pac wireless 900 rootennas to make life easy.
Sometimes it's better to wait.
George
cw wrote:
Thanks for the info, Lonnie. The coathangers came after w
Thanks for the info, Lonnie. The coathangers came after we couldn't make
PacWireless sector panels, omnis or yagis work. Four radios on one WAR4
surprises me. Thought that was too much power consumption.
You're using yagis for the base station broadcast? Which one/s? Can anyone
point me at doc
We have not finished testing yet so we are keeping a bit quiet. I do
not wish to promote this until I know for sure it is reliable. I can
say that initial testing shows much better results than cw is seeing.
Of course we do not use omnis and coat hangers but rather PacWireless
9 dB, 11 dB and 13
CW,
Did anyone offer their experiences on the SR9's as you asked below? Maybe I
missed them. :(
- Cliff
On 8/31/06 4:05 PM, "cw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone getting satisfactory performance with SR9s on WAR boards? If so,
> what antennas are you using for base station and subscriber
Dan's got some. I'm awaiting 6, but I hear I won't be getting them till
Mid-June.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of rabbtux rabbtux
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SR9 perfo
Did you folks finally get some SR9s to test? How are your initial results
On 5/18/06, Rick Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Someone mentioned that in their testing TX was in a 10 mhz channel and RX
was 5 MHZ (or however you set)
Either way, it wasn't setting it for the same width baed on
Subject: RE: [WISPA] SR9
performance
Someone mentioned that in their testing TX
was in a 10 mhz channel and RX was 5 MHZ (or however you set)
Either way, it wasn't setting it for the
same width baed on what you pick - i.e. it was 5/10 10/10 and 20/10mhz
respect
Someone mentioned that in their testing TX was in a 10 mhz
channel and RX was 5 MHZ (or however you set)
Either way, it wasn't setting it for the same width baed on
what you pick - i.e. it was 5/10 10/10 and 20/10mhz
respectively.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
13 matches
Mail list logo
