On 6/29/06, Rick Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The difference between FON and nimrod customers, is that FON isexploiting this for THEIR gain. is flowing, at my expense, intoFON's pockets, due to a nimrod customer that installed their gear at the
violation of my AUP.Again, plz read fon.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] www.fon.com - a threat to us all? - back to net
neutrality
On 6/28/06, Tom DeReggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If it was, then it would be illegal to block
hackers and criminals from using your network as well.
As FON clearly has no co
Peter R. wrote:
Rick Smith wrote:
I still don't see why anyone should be able to use my network without
paying me for the right to do so. PERIOD.
I don't run a network for the benefit of the free world, I run it for
the benefit of my checkbook. Which needs SERIOUS help. :)
OK, and whil
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] www.fon.com - a threat to us all? - back to net
neutrality
Rick Smith wrote:
> I still don't see why anyone should be able to use my network without
> paying me for
Rick Smith wrote:
I still don't see why anyone should be able to use my network without
paying me for the right to do so. PERIOD.
I don't run a network for the benefit of the free world, I run it for
the benefit of my checkbook. Which needs SERIOUS help. :)
OK, and while we're at it, why
Dylan Oliver wrote:
> http://en.fon.com/biz/isps_friends.php.
>
> (i) have a FON Social Router or a router that is compatible with the FON
> Software and (ii) have a contract with an ISP that permits the FONero to
> share bandwidth.
And how many of your customers actually read all the fine print
On 6/28/06, Tom DeReggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it was, then it would be illegal to block
hackers and criminals from using your network as well.
As FON clearly has no concern for Acceptable Use
Policiies, therefore illegal activity, and AUPs are clearly allowable and
enforcable cont
Reggi
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] www.fon.com - a threat to us all? - back to net
neutrality
I understood Charles post regarding net neutrality, that you summarized also
very clearly.
My point is that Net Neutrality conflicts with other law
alizing it when
> getting voted on.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: We
, with out rtealizing it when
getting voted on.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:13 PM
Subject:
I think what Charles is getting at is, is it legal for an ISP to place
the 'no open AP' or 'no sharing your connection' restriction on your
service? I have heard some people arguing the case that NN is "I'm
paying for my bandwidth so I can do what I want to with it".
Sam Tetherow
Sandh
Subject: RE: [WISPA] www.fon.com - a threat to us all? - back to net
neutrality
out
of curiosity (would like input from the pro net neutral people) -- would
blocking something like FON constitute a violation of net
neutrality?
#x27;WISPA
General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] www.fon.com -
a threat to us all? - back to net neutrality
out of curiosity (would like input from
the pro net neutral people) -- would blocking something like FON constitute a violation
of net neutrality?
-Charles
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Rick Smith wrote:
OK, and while we're at it, why is "net neutral" good ? I admit
The terminology here is somewhat confusing. The term "net neutral"
seems to be used to describe two unrelated ideologies (both of which
are "bad", IMNSHO). One is the opposite view to wha
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
out of curiosity (would like input from the pro net neutral people)
-- would blocking something like FON constitute a violation of net
neutrality?
I don't think you'll find many "pro net neutral people" on this
list. I would have to say that most of th
ist'Subject: RE: [WISPA] www.fon.com - a threat to us all? -
back to net neutrality
out of
curiosity (would like input from the pro net neutral people) -- would blocking
something like FON constitute a violation of net neutrality?
-Charles
---CW
Title: Message
out of
curiosity (would like input from the pro net neutral people) -- would blocking
something like FON constitute a violation of net neutrality?
-Charles
---CWLabTechnology
Architectshttp://www.cwlab.com
-Original Messa
17 matches
Mail list logo
