We had disabled "Prohibit ARP Spoofing" at one point to appease the 14+ code.
The issue was resolved in a later release and we enabled it again.
We are not currently seeing any issues 8.5.0.11, moving to 13 now.
Thanks
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of
Trent,
Are you saying users need to manually select or the auto-detect is working
properly now?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Hurt,Trenton W.
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 7:51 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
gt;>
On Behalf Of McClintic, Thomas
Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 9:51 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] eduroam CAT Config/Cert Renewal with New Root
We use an internal CA signed server certificate witho
We use an internal CA signed server certificate without issue for EAP-TLS. We
are currently using Clearpass onboard & moving to SecureW2.
We previously used Incommon for server CA and are much happier with using a
private CA for the server certificate. The validity period is very long.
I would
+1 for cradlepoint.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Travis Geske
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 9:15 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Multi sim 4G routers
EXTERNAL EMAIL
We use CradlePoint and have been
y
the likes of NetAlly AirMagnet and iBwave though. I’d add those to your list to
evaluate.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
On Behalf Of McClintic, Thomas
Sent: 19 July 2021 14:44
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAU
any anyone confirm this?
Any alternate products?
Thanks..
Phill Solomon
Senior Technical Lead (Network Engineering)
Deakin University, IS - AV & Networks, ICT Infrastructure Services, eSolutions
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV
We have 2 Ekahau licenses tied to Sidekicks. We use a team cloud account for
uploading projects, with the understanding that using the software requires the
Sidekick to be attached to the machine.
Ekahau has notified us that this is not compliant with their licensing terms
and we need to
We ordered about 400 535 APs and the lead time was about 6 weeks. We did accept
partials which we were told would expedite the delivery. These were received
about 2-3 weeks ago.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Enfield, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, May 20,
We are still in the adoption stage of our EAP-TLS w/ onboarding. We use
Clearpass Onboarding. I have not found an issue with the system, but users are
often frustrated with the steps required.
This is not a fault of Clearpass, I believe; but has led us to seek other
options to improve adoption
Any other Unii-2 or Extended channels enabled on your environment?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Jon Marriott
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:32 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba Wireless- MacBook WiFi slow on
Am I understanding correctly that if the CN also exists as a SAN then it is
accepted?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Tim Cappalli
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 9:20 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] [EXT] Re:
We are now investigating an issue with Mac Computers on our Visitor wireless.
The problem exists on Cisco WLC running 8.5 code. The WLAN is configured Open
w/ MAC Filtering and ISE NAC. We use Clearpass to push the ACL and Web Redirect.
A packet capture on the client shows nothing going out
S-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] iOS 14 Causing ARP Spoofing Events on Aruba
Controllers
Yup.. we had to disable the "Arp Spoof" settings in the IDS profiles. We have
other irons in the fire so we are not able to do much to investigate this issue
at this time.
>>
on behalf of "McClintic, Thomas"
mailto:thomas.mcclin...@uth.tmc.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@listserv.educause.edu>>
Date: Friday, September 18, 2020 at 11:46 AM
To:
"WIRELESS-LAN@listserv
We have begun seeing an impact with iOS 14 on our various SSIDs with ARP
Spoofing events. We had not seen an event this year until July 9th (the date
beta was released). There has been a large increase since the 16th of the
events.
The events seem to occur randomly as we are starting to
I have upgraded to Android 11, removed all user certificates and onboarded with
Aruba QuickConnect. I am able to connect, but can verify that the setting is
now 'Do No Validate' for server certificate.
I downloaded and installed the certificate with the long instructions below. I
was able to
The first step is tools. If we can't survey and troubleshoot then we will be
blindly jumping into things.
I want to understand what impact AFC will have in our area as well. Plenty of
time for planning that's for sure.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
On Behalf Of McClintic, Thomas
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 3:49 PM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] [
We are currently in the beginning of implementing NAC on the wire. We are using
a phased approach to ease clients into it.
Phase 1a) Introduce open MAC authentication to all ports, this helps verify
connectivity and licensing.
Phase 1b) Rollout certificate enrollment via AD and JAMF for EAP-TLS
We moved to 8.5.0.6 for about 30 days. Okay so far. We moved for some features
to 8.5 and 6 was required for a RAP issue we were having for LMS preemption.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Enfield, Chuck
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 2:33 PM
To:
Perhaps we are near the point that registering SSIDs similar to a call sign is
required, which then warrants the use of security options. If you have a SSID
named HARVARD and someone is using that same SSID within your 'territory' then
it is obviously them being malicious. How that could be
We use Siklu 2x00 series for a link that is over 1mile.
I have nothing but positive things to say about them. I have also used Trango
and Lightpointe in the past. The amount of features in the Siklu radio really
impressed me. It has been very stable and installation was a breeze.
TJ McClintic
Jason,
You are brave, I would love to know when you feel confident in AOS 8. Thank you
for taking the time to early adopt to help Aruba figure it out.
We are waiting patiently to move to AOS8 but are getting anxious as we want to
implement some of the new features.
TJ McClintic
Thanks Eric for the information!
Your first two comments look like show stoppers for us. Will be interested in
hearing how things progress.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Kenny,
I would also like to know, especially around SensorPush.
TJ McClintic
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Johnson, Christopher
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 11:10 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
, December 1, 2017 9:10 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Managing static power/channel assignments?
On 1 Dec 2017, at 15:31, McClintic, Thomas wrote:
> It won't see them as rogues so you need not be concerned there. It is
> common practice to create a RF P
It won't see them as rogues so you need not be concerned there. It is common
practice to create a RF Profile variant for multiple AP Groups and those groups
be within RF range of each other on the same controller.
On the TPC we use a 3db shift up from the power used in surveying. This allows
Tim,
Do you have anything with a link to this information from Palo Alto’s
perspective? Ie. which protocols and such.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim Tyler
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 11:08 AM
To:
This seems contradicting…
Workarounds
===
All vulnerabilities described in this advisory may be mitigated by
disabling certain features:
- For ArubaOS, ensure that 802.11r is disabled by verifying that any
configured SSID profile does not contain a "dot11r-profile". From the
Sorry, this was mentioned previously. I should have read bottom up instead of
top down ☺
TJ McClintic
From: McClintic, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 8:30 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba AP Models - 315 vs 325
The 330 also has a multi-gig port
The 330 also has a multi-gig port for speeds >1gbps. Goes back to the channel
bonding though…..
TJ McClintic
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jake Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:18 AM
To:
7, 2:42 PM, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on
behalf of McClintic, Thomas" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU on behalf of
thomas.mcclin...@uth.tmc.edu> wrote:
The recurring service fee is $.10 per enrollment according to IPEDS with a
minimum
Fees Thoughts
My understanding is that there are no recurring fees for Internet2 members,
just a one-time registration fee.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:21:08PM +, McClintic, Thomas wrote:
> Good Afternoon,
>
> We have not yet implemented EDUROAM, but began looking into it as it
Good Afternoon,
We have not yet implemented EDUROAM, but began looking into it as it was part
of our Internet2 subscription. It now appears that they have changed the
service to have an annual fee, plus price per enrolled student.
Our feelings are that implementing now with an added fee does
Danny,
Try adding the domain in the profile for which the cert was issued
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 12:20 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
I too am running a trial here. Would also like to hear the experience Lee is
requesting if possible.
Thanks!
Original Message
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Nyansa
From: "Sullivan, Don"
Date: Feb 10, 2017, 2:03 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Next time you have this issue, try connecting a console to the AP and run the
following:
ap: fsck flash:
Are you sure you want to fsck "flash:" (could take some time) (y/n)?y
flashfs[0]: …
ap: boot
This works for us on the failed to reload properly APs.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues
We have Airwave and PI.
I started using PI when it was WCS and was very pleased with it. I like PI and
where it has come, but it lacks in doing what Cisco states or I feel it should
do. Constantly finding new bugs is always painful.
The Airwave deployment is much smaller, but I find it to be
Who is your hardware manufacturer? Airwave and Cisco Prime are the top tier
platforms for such management, however come at a premium.
What is your current network management software?
TJ McClintic
Network Architect
UTHealth | The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston's
Ruckus has a speedflex app that runs against a zapd process. I put it on a
local server and a laptop so I can run speed tests to our server environment
and wireless client to wireless client. I use the app on my android phone to
run the actual tests.
I think Aruba pushed new technologies and features, Cisco has a way to improve
them. In many ways I saw Cisco behind Aruba until the HPE change. Now, it seems
as though Aruba is much slower to releasing things. Hopefully this changes in
the coming year as the HPE merger should be completed.
Here is my suggestion:
Create a separate mobility group for your satellite controller.
If you can separate the mobility groups for the 2 8540 pairs I would do that.
However, if people can roam from one building to another and they are not in
the same mobility group you will see client issues.
Those sled mounts are great and the antenna you are looking at has very little
wind resistance. I would suggest using fiber if able and take Sam’s points to
heart as well. Proper sealing and grounding will keep your install working for
years instead of months.
TJ McClintic
From: The EDUCAUSE
We are using WiSM2’s but here are our issues so far with 8.0.120
-HA SSO Failovers caused by unknown process crash (no crash file)
-Engineering release installed which caused HA failures (both controllers) due
to mDNS process watchdog crash
-DHCP issues for idle timed out clients performing l3
Your mention of QAM peaks my interest. Have you disabled lower MCS index rates?
I’ve often wondered if we disabled 18 and below but leave MCS 0-2 enabled, can
clients use that lower rate on HT and VHT? This is included in both beacons and
probe responses.
To the original topic, we have b
Bruce,
I was hoping others would reply to get some feedback. Currently running
6.4.2.13, 7210 and 215s. Asked my HPE rep and they said we can stay on the same
version unless we run into an issue that needs addressing?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
This is a great article and contains very good information.
However, I follow the same belief as Jeff. This is mostly from a growth and
future perspective of 802.11ac, etc. In order to take as much advantage as
possible of ac (256 QAM an MU-MIMO); an AP per classroom looks more like a
Ryan,
Thank you for bringing this into the discussion. The cost turned us away from
it quickly. Adding a yearly line item in the budget, knowing that it will grow
is not easy to justify.
I hope they review the pricing model. I too am interested in any information
early adopters will share
The AirCheck is a great tool. Lots of information quick and easy. Yes, you can
get the same info through applications, but the ease is nice.
Stay away from apple products for utilizing wireless tools. You will end up
starting a windows VM to run most of the apps, I’m sure more Apple supporters
What happens when users choose the 2.4 enabled SSID even though they support
5ghz? They may select it based off signal strength indicators on their client,
even though they will get a lower data rate.
I agree to turning off 2.4 on a network that you control all devices for; like
enterprise
My understanding is that the two 5ghz radios will have required channel
separation to prevent NCI. Time will tell of course…
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Atkins
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:08 PM
To elaborate on my surface with a mouse... I use the stylus to click for
surveying and the mouse to operate the menus when saving and verifying.
Does anyone with a Surface have recommendations for battery life? The yoga
gives me much more time surveying before having to charge.
-Original
I have used tough books, yoga and surface pro 3.
Of all of these, the surface pro 3 was my favorite. Be sure to have a mouse
because Survey Pro just feels better in my opinion with it.
I'm interested to hear other opinions.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues
My understanding is that the CAPWAP traffic is not controlled by the CPU ACL.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Felix Windt
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 2:12 PM
To:
To future proof your deployment it may be best to upgrade your WLC to a 5520. I
suggest deploying the x700 series LWAP to support 802.11ac as we have seen a
large increase in clients supporting it. Here is a comparison chart for the
various ac enabled LWAPs.
I believe in allowing the client to make the decision. Even with limiting the
suppressed probe responses or deauthing; there can be times when a client could
experience issues.
We allow 12, mandatory 18. Limit the transmit power on both radios. The issue I
see with many sticky clients are that
We have been piloting Mersive Solstice, it seems to be accomplishing what is
needed so far.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Matt O'Brien
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 8:12 AM
To:
Like Dan, we've seen this from DFS events.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Brisson
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:38 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco
I don't recall any extra steps when adding it to our 2.2 server. The document
you have linked for the 5500 configuration is what I did. I had changed IPs
though, so I had to tear it down to build it back up.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Lee,
I had this happen back in February with 2702’s like Oliver.
Here is the bug I was sent from the case I opened. CSCur86600
Looks like it’s something in the 8.0 recovery code.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
Which wireless system are you using?
What type of rogue devices are you most interested in? (rogue on a wire,
neighboring device, etc.)
Do you need to also locate these rogue devices?
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
We use the 'byod' model in our housing. Students sign up for Comcast and we do
not interfere with their use of wireless. The housing area only has university
wifi in the administration areas. However, our housing is much more like
apartments than normal college housing.
From: The EDUCAUSE
Above ceiling installation with auto RF mechanisms like TPC can cause lower
power settings when the walls do not go above the ceiling. We have many
additions throughout our campus where the walls do not extend above the grid.
An AP placed above that will behave much differently than expected.
For now mgig doesn't seem necessary from a wireless perspective. I think new
installations may justify multiple drops if you know funding for some areas
comes and goes. Like a slow refresh on switch gear, but the ability to upgrade
to full AC Aps. Mgig will most likely be driven from our
Here is the info Jeffry:
The number of FlexConnect groups and access point support depends on the
platform that you are using. You can configure the following:
Up to 100 FlexConnect groups and 25 access points per group for a Cisco 5500
Series Controller.
Up to 1000 FlexConnect groups and 50
Bruce,
Not to side track this conversation too far, but is this because the ArubaOS is
that stable or that it is not as prevalent?
This is almost an exact reason for something like this to exist. In a perfect
world this collaborative site would have sub-forums for the different vendors.
I suggest doing an ac site survey on a sample building with the radios in their
existing locations. Then, do a survey in the same building with your proposed
locations.
Make sure your data shows how far the ac data rates propagate. Doing the survey
on a UNI-1 channel is best imo.
I did
Dan,
Do you have DHCP Addr. Assignment Required on? I’m seeing a similar issue since
going to 7.6 and also see it on 8.0.
I can’t access your case, so if you could update me offline that would be
wonderful.
Thanks
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
I have used an AMX panel and didn't lose the battle about the vendor installing
their access point. The password for the advanced configuration was 1988 (good
year) in case you ever need it. I was told that was the default. We used PEAP
and it performed well.
Great video Joel, very humorous!
AddTrust via InCommon
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Julian Y Koh
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:09 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
We have 1 802.1X SSID and 1 open web auth passthrough SSID.
Traffic on the authenticated SSID goes through our normal User VRF. Traffic on
guest goes directly to an internet VRF which passes through our PAN. We do
allow traffic to go out the internet and back, which we are flirting with
Can anyone running MR3 (.130) speak to the stability of the code? Any issues
you have seen? How long have you been on it?
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Sessler
Sent:
Good Morning,
We added the wireless infrastructure to the 5 year refresh cycle which is used
for our wired network. In this cycle specific school buildings are refreshed
each year. This helps in two ways; first the budget for 5 years is spread
nicely and second we aren’t hit with a large
Good Morning,
We have been running 7.6 for over 2 months in full production, 6 months in test
and limited deployment. No client issues reported yet.
We did run into the issue with web auth crashing our anchor controller. Be sure
to get the code .120.6 or later for the fix if you are running
Wired with mDNS Snooping enabled on the required APs. Wireless is just not
worth the hassle.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 8:32 AM
To:
You must also upgrade to 7.5 or later to enable 'New mobility'. If you can't do
this yet, avoid mixed environments to prevent mobility issues.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/7-5/config_guide/b_cg75/b_cg75_chapter_010010101.html
TJ McClintic
-Original Message-
It would be very helpful to have a visible comparison for proposed acceptable
levels of exposure compared to maximum FCC regulations, and then compared to
average transmit power for your environment.
Something similar to showing a high wattage bulb then lowering the power to the
ratio of FCC
Tristan,
I do not have a laptop with the issue yet, I will ask our Desktop groups to
report issues back. However, do you have Global IPv6 Config Enabled or Disabled?
Thanks
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of
That can depend on your scope. Are you looking for a one for one swap of the
hardware? Are you looking to expand your wireless coverage? Make sure you
identify the deliverables. Most importantly site survey documentation prior to
the installation for your review. Provide your minimum RSSI for a
Kitri,
If you are allowing RRM to do TPC you may want to evaluate your layout. TPC is
setting the PL to 7 because the APs can all see each other. If you turn up the
PL you may see your utilization for 802.11 climb as well.
Just something to consider, you can also set the Minimum Power Level
.
Kitri
--
University of Oregon
On 3/17/14 1:40 PM, McClintic, Thomas wrote:
Sure!
http://www.terra-wave.com/shop/245-ghz-6-dbi-mimo-quad-patch-antenna-with-rptnc-plug-connector-p-2075.htmlhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.terra-wave.com/shop/245-ghz-6-dbi-mimo-quad-patch
We have installed in a few auditoriums to help enhance the wireless there. We
are using directional patch antennas to keep the coverage to the auditorium as
well as use a higher mandatory rate.
I have seen no issues with clients hanging on to ac, however I see only about
5-10% of users
patch antennas to keep the coverage to the
auditorium as well as use a higher mandatory rate.
Mind sharing what antennas you use?
Thanks
Norman
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, McClintic, Thomas
thomas.mcclin...@uth.tmc.edumailto:thomas.mcclin...@uth.tmc.edu wrote:
We have installed in a few
Danny,
Were you running 7.4 with that disabled as well and 7.6 turned it back on? We
are running SecureWeb without issue, however we use web-passthrough.
John,
Did you see this on your anchor controller?
~TJ
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
toggling RLDP on/off for Local mode AP's at scheduled
intervals after hours might be a decent option.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] on behalf of McClintic, Thomas
[thomas.mcclin
I would rather use Rogue Detector APs. We have RLDP enabled here, we are
working toward incorporating Rogue Detector APs instead.
RLDP only works on open SSIDs and impacts valid client performance.
Rogue Detectors can sense secured networks for wired rogues.
We do not currently use any
We have started using a group policy for user AD authentication on our loaner
laptops, here are the instructions sent to the desktop folks:
Click Start
In the search box type group policy
Press ENTER
Open the following folder:
Computer Configuration Administrative Templates System Logon
With the FCC changes coming on March 1st regarding signal boosters, working
with the carriers is now required. We have started getting approached by
carriers here too.
http://wireless.fcc.gov/signal-boosters/index.html
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Those that are seeing issues, what is your Global IPv6 Config setting?
I have been running 7.6 in test and am unable to replicate the issue in my test
environment. I will turn off the g radios to see if I can force the issue here.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless
I have been told 2.1 is expected sometime around March, and 2.2 (which is now
the merger back from 1.4) will be in July timeframe. Your date of June looks
similar, but they are changing the version number because 2.1 needs to be
released along with 1.4.1(MR not patch).
I also hear 8.0MR will
Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of McClintic, Thomas
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 2:22 PM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 7.6 code and Prime 2.0?
I have
92 matches
Mail list logo