edu>
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 9:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [SPF:Probably_Forged] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus?
We are relatively new Ruckus customers, currently split with Meru/Fortinet.
When Fortinet started releasing firmware for the Meru APs, we started seei
We are relatively new Ruckus customers, currently split with
Meru/Fortinet. When Fortinet started releasing firmware for the Meru APs,
we started seeing major connectivity issues. We are doing one building at
a time and don't appear to be having any major conflicts. Currently around
120 Ruckus
That's a good observation. We have had little need for support but when we
did Ruckus was very persistent in solving the issue. Some may say they
bugged us a lot to make sure everything was in order.
They have a cloud based solution that we have just started to look at.
Having just one campus
Forgot to say this is Eckerd College, We have had over 400 APs and 4200
connections at one time
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Harry Rauch wrote:
> We have been using Ruckus for at least 7 years. We mainly use 1 controller
> with a backup and a 2nd controller for newer
Troy
We use Ruckus Wireless only on our campus and our seven remote campuses as
well. We have 135 Access Points running on 2 controllers, one controller
for main campus and one controller for our remote sites.
We have between 200 and 300 users per day.
We use to have Cisco but replaced them in
We have been using Ruckus for at least 7 years. We mainly use 1 controller
with a backup and a 2nd controller for newer devices as a test platform.
We have gone from Extreme to Cisco to Ruckus and now entirely ruckus. We
have purchased from several suppliers and found the cost to be about 10%
Philippe,
I am confused by your statement about Apple dropping support for EAP-TTLS. Do
you have something official stating this? IOS9 clearly supports EAP-TTLS-PAP
and my understanding is that MacOS 10.11 is essentially the same as iOS9 is
terms of 802.1x.
Thank you.
Ken
--
Ken LeCompte -
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ken LeCompte
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 2:57 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus has purchased Cloudpath
Philippe,
I am confused by your statement about Apple dropping support for EAP-TTLS. Do
you
UCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus has purchased Cloudpath
Steve
I work at Chemeketa Community College in Salem, Or and we are a Ruckus Wireless
shop as well and looking at Cloudpath. We would like a little insite into the
do's and don
Office- 409-880-2386
Cell- 409-351-5961
steven.ve...@lamar.edu
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin John Higgins" <bjhigg...@wpi.edu>
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:54:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus has pur
Well that's... interesting.
Anyone heard any rumors about what their roadmap might be? These acquisitions
of an independent service by a larger portfolio company rarely seem to well
for customers of the independent service if you're not also a customer of the
large one.
Frank Sweetser fs
Or if you only care about 802.1X automatic configuration (and not about all the
features of device management that come with Cloudpath and others)
you can use the free configuration tool from cat.eduroam.org (definitely not as
good as Cloudpath, but good enough for many of us ..and it does
Ryan,
I would also be interested in hearing how your SecureW2 deployment is going.
We have their solution, but are underutilizing it at the moment as it is only
used for eduroam configuration/onboarding (though we are in a transition with
most users directed to the eduroam CAT). The
My email is r...@unc.edu. Send me an email. I might setup a call for those
interested.
Ryan Turner
Senior Network Engineer, ITS
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
+1 919 274 7926 Mobile
+1 919 445 0113 Office
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 11:19 AM, David R. Morton
Why did you switch to SecureW2?
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:56:18PM +, Turner, Ryan H wrote:
> Wow. That came out of nowhere. We officially switched to SecureW2 for on
> boarding at the beginning of the year from Cloudpath. Any news about
> management changes? Is Kevin still running the
Best case scenario: Ruckus' awesome Dynamic PSK feature gets rolled into
Cloudpath for the rest of us and the pricing comes down in an effort to use
CloudPath to eventually sway customers towards Ruckus hardware. Worst case:
Cloudpath effectively goes Ruckus-only, leaving us to move to either
A lot of reasons. We are an EAP TLS shop. We were with the enrollment
platform almost from the beginning (I think Kevin said we were inside if the
first 10) and used it for a few hundred thousand onboards during 2 years. I
would love to share all the reasons to the list, but I would prefer
, 2015 9:02 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus has purchased Cloudpath
Best case scenario: Ruckus' awesome Dynamic PSK feature gets rolled into
Cloudpath for the rest of us and the pricing comes down in an effort to use
CloudPath to eventually sway
Just to clarify, CAT (cat.eduroam.org) is mostly designed for PEAP and
EAP-TTLS.
You could use it for EAP-TLS but it doesn’t tie to a PKI (that part of the code
is missing)
Support for EAP-TTLS for Windows XP-VISTA-7 was interrupted this year after
SecureW2 asked CAT to stop using its code.
, Bruce T. [bjohns...@partners.org]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
From what I can tell they use the MAC address as a base identifier; in a mesh the system
identifies the device and somehow decides and which AP has a better signal/connection.
Unmeshed APs simply hold on to the device until
: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
We have almost completely converted to Ruckus from Cisco and Extreme.
We have had very little need for support; the things just work. We have reduced
our AP numbers by over 30% with better coverage. Once installed in a dorm
setting we have never had to go back other than one
:* Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:12 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
We have almost completely converted to Ruckus from Cisco and Extreme.
We have had very little need for support; the things just work. We
have reduced our AP numbers by over 30
Listserv
Cc: Lee H Badman
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Yes, we ran both systems at max power to allow for greatest range; our
densities in some lecture halls were over 150 active users for one array.
Ruckus provides a link to Tom's Hardware Guide that has done some extensive
testing
H Badman
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Yes, we ran both systems at max power to allow for greatest range; our
densities in some lecture halls were over 150 active users for one array.
Ruckus provides a link to Tom's Hardware Guide that has done some
extensive testing of several front
, 2011 8:22 AM
*To:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
*Cc:* Lee H Badman
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
** **
Yes, we ran both systems at max power to allow for greatest range; our
densities in some lecture halls were over 150 active users for one array.
Ruckus
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike King
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:20 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
The funny part about this article, Merikai is consistently horrible.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Mike King
m...@mpking.commailto:m...@mpking.com wrote
: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:27 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Excellent information, Harry- Thanks. I have a feeling Cisco cringes to read
that 3500 APs were tested with 4402s instead of 5508 controllers.
-Lee Badman
From: Harry Rauch
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Lee, one thing to be aware of is that these other companies (Ruckus, Xirrus,
etc) use arrays, not access points. So there are multiple radios per unit. On
a per-radio basis, the number of users may be similar to a single access point
(we’ve found
Badman
*From:*Harry Rauch [mailto:rauc...@eckerd.edu
mailto:rauc...@eckerd.edu]
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:22 AM
*To:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
*Cc:* Lee H Badman
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Yes
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Excellent information, Harry- Thanks. I have a feeling Cisco cringes
to read that 3500 APs were tested with 4402s instead of 5508 controllers.
-Lee Badman
*From:*Harry Rauch [mailto:rauc...@eckerd.edu]
mailto:[mailto:rauc...@eckerd.edu]
*Sent:* Wednesday
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU [WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Agreed- and it is fascinating stuff.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Brian Helman
[bhel
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU [WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Agreed- and it is fascinating stuff.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf
Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:27 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
Excellent information, Harry- Thanks. I have a feeling Cisco cringes to read
T. [bjohns...@partners.org]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
From what I can tell they use the MAC address as a base identifier; in a mesh
the system identifies the device and somehow decides and which AP has a better
signal/connection. Unmeshed APs simply hold on to the device until
: Johnson, Bruce T. [bjohns...@partners.org]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ruckus
From what I can tell they use the MAC address as a base identifier; in a mesh
the system identifies the device and somehow decides and which AP has a better
signal/connection. Unmeshed APs simply hold on to the device
We have almost completely converted to Ruckus from Cisco and Extreme.
We have had very little need for support; the things just work. We have
reduced our AP numbers by over 30% with better coverage. Once installed
in a dorm setting we have never had to go back other than one device
that
We could agree with Harry's assessment.
We are just completing our implementation of Ruckus on our campus. We are also
converting from Cisco.
We are very happy with every aspect of the equipment. One example is in our
Science building. We replaced 14 Cisco 1242 APs with 10 Ruckus 7962
37 matches
Mail list logo