[WISPA] Earthlink to build Philadelphia wireless network

http://q1.schwab.com/content/rb/2005/10/04/1136855.html   5:52 PM ET 10/04/05 Earthlink to build Philadelphia wireless network NEW YORK, Oct 4 (Reuters) - Internet service provider EarthLink Inc. plans to build a city-wide wireless network for Philadelphia to provide residents and busin

[WISPA] Re: [equipment-l] Dial up - CHEAP

I read your arttical and your name caught my eye I was wondering if you are kin to a Al Dearman in White Castle La. if you are please contact me he was a very dear friend. I know he had a brother in Mississippi .He was like a older brother my e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks so much. Yahoo! for

Re: [WISPA] Earthlink to build Philadelphia wireless network

A perfect reason why Municipality is a VERY bad thing. The top contender bidders were large super companies willing to spend lots of money, in exchange for the marketing benefit.  Basically publuc Ride of ways, that Small independent WISPs have had to fight tooth and nail to gain access to w

Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

Yes, But I don't believe it. Its not likely they have an average ARPU of $400 a sub. But then again, maybe I'm wrong. If they really had $1,200,000 a month revenue, thats $14,000,000 a year, and they got screwed on the deal. Thats only a 2x annual revenue sell out, a way low evaluation unde

[WISPA] Cogent - Level3

For those that are not aware, Level-3 vilolated its inplace agreements, and blocked all peering connections from Cogent communications yesterday (October 5th), and rumor has it that they are also now blocking all Cogent assigned IP ranges, so that routing diverse paths won't be effective.  N

Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3

Hi Tom Do you have a url for this news? Thanks George Tom DeReggi wrote: For those that are not aware, Level-3 vilolated its inplace agreements, and blocked all peering connections from Cogent communications yesterday (October 5th), and rumor has it that they are also now blocking all Cogent

Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3

To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated between L3 and Cogent. There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is blocking Cogent traffic through Cogent's Verio transit (which Cogent pays $$ for.) It appears that Cogent is unwilling to use this route because it would force the

Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3

Here you go: http://ct.zdnet.com.com/clicks?c=530414-23845546&brand=zdnet&ds=5&fs=0 George wrote: Hi Tom Do you have a url for this news? Thanks George Tom DeReggi wrote: For those that are not aware, Level-3 vilolated its inplace agreements, and blocked all peering connections from Cogent

Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3

To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated between L3 and Cogent. I heard otherwise, however I can't prove that. >There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is blocking Cogent traffic through Cogent's Verio transit (which Cogent pays $$ for.) There was evidence. I wis

Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3

On 10/6/2005 1:03 PM, Tom DeReggi created: >> To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated >> between L3 and Cogent. > > I heard otherwise, however I can't prove that. Cogent on their own web site said that agreements were not violated: "Level 3 terminated its peering with Cog

[WISPA] rooftop leasing?

Aftering spending almost 8 weeks trying to get a lease with a rooftop provider, they come back at us with a request for a business plan and financial statement before going forward --- Thoughts? Has anybody had a request like this before? We haven't Thanks Dan > -Original Message- > Fr

Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

We have certainly had landlords question us financially, but none have ever asked for a business plan. -Matt Dan Metcalf wrote: Aftering spending almost 8 weeks trying to get a lease with a rooftop provider, they come back at us with a request for a business plan and financial statement befor

RE: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

Did you do an NDA? What type of financial documents did provide? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Matt Liotta > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:16 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing? > > We have cert

RE: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

None of their business. We had a request like this, and claimed that it was unfair business practice, and the landlord dropped their request for such information. Probably ended up costing us that extra $100 / month but our financial statements are no one's business. -Original Message--

RE: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

How is it none of their business? The business plan is none of their business, but the financials certainly are. Just like any other lease agreement you enter in to (car, house, apartment, whatever) they want to make sure you can pay up before they give you the lease. -Original Message- Fr

Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

I would offer them credit references, your landlord, suppliers that you have net 10 or net 30 accounts with and so on. Nothing more. Blair Aubrey Wells wrote: How is it none of their business? The business plan is none of their business, but the financials certainly are. Just like any other

Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

Depends on the value of the roof top. Basically if they are asking for this, it is because in the past, 90% of their tenants never paid their roof rent because of bankruptcies and such. They just want to be certain that they can count on you succeeding, so they get paid. By giving them a busi

Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3

Cogent recently bought or took over some of Verrio's business, maybe this has to do with that? George Tony Weasler wrote: To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated between L3 and Cogent. There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is blocking Cogent traffic through Cogen

Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3

Hi George, Is this what you are referring to? http://www.verio.com/about/newsroom/pr/index.cfm?fuseaction=press&Year=04&id=249751102013222 Cogent and Verio do have business relationships and that is probably one of the reasons why they chose to use them as a transit provider. I don't think that i

[WISPA] CNN coverage- WTG Mac Dearman!

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/10/05/katrina.tech.response.ap/index.html pretty cool article...:) - Jeff -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Customer dropped branch

Scott, Ouch! I would assume customer paid for the antenna? Thanks, Dawn Scott Reed wrote: Customer tried to improve signal by cutting a tree limb that was in front of antenna: Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net

RE: [WISPA] Customer dropped branch

Title: Message All ya can do in this case is replace it and laugh it off :)   I have extra feed arms - will send ya a couple ! :)   JohnnyO -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott ReedSent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:48 PM

Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

if need be, post a bond. Aubrey Wells wrote: How is it none of their business? The business plan is none of their business, but the financials certainly are. Just like any other lease agreement you enter in to (car, house, apartment, whatever) they want to make sure you can pay up before t

RE: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

Hey Matt - give me a call tomorrow morning please - 1-800-774-0320 JohnnyO -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 4:16 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing? We have certainl

RE: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?

NDA or not.NO WAY to the biz plan would be my vote Chuck Moses High Desert Wireless Broadband Communication 16922 Airport Blvd # 3 Mojave CA 93501 661 824 3431 office 818 406 6818 cell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Metcalf Sent