I didn’t see any replies to yesterdays post….
Anybody know where to get some more SR9 cards?
Chris
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Here's the reply I got off list to my post:
In stock and shipping now:
http://www.wlanparts.com/product/SR9
Thank you
Frank Keeney
Pasadena Networks, LLC
Antennas, Cables and Equipment:
http://www.wlanparts.com
Hope this helps
George
chris cooper wrote:
I didn’t see any replies to yesterd
Where do I find a 180* sector?
Brian
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
So, has anyone successfully deployed the Tranzeo 900
solution with SR9’s yet? Mikrotik, Ikarus or Star-OS? I’m
looking for real results so I can start making decisions.
Thanks,
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482
Founding Member of WISP
I am quickly outgrowing my current AP.
I currently have an AP on the side of a mountain with all of my clients
within 1 90* sector.
How do I add an AP without blasting myself away with my own signal?
Do I put 2 APs up there with 45* sectors on them?
Do I put 2 APs up there with 90* sectors a
We are awaiting our own shipment but customers have reported good
results with WAR boards and the new V3 for x86 WRAP boards.
Lonnie
On 8/3/06, Rick Harnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, has anyone successfully deployed the Tranzeo 900 solution with SR9's
yet? Mikrotik, Ikarus or Star-OS?
I am assuming 2.4 GHz WiFi access? If that is the case then use two 90
degree sectors overlooking the same coverage area. I would try to place
some vertical or horizontal displacement between the antennas if at all
possible to eliminate any noise introduction between APs. (This
displacement is
Whoops!
Yes, I am using 2.4, 802.11.
With that being said, does anyone out there have an extra or slightly
used 6500 series Tranzeo AP available? (off-list of course)
ryan
John Scrivner wrote:
I am assuming 2.4 GHz WiFi access? If that is the case then use two 90
degree sectors overlooking
We use multiple 16 dB sectors that give me 65 degrees of coverage. I
can run channel 1, 6, and 11 with no problems.
Most customers can see at least 2 AP units so I have my choice of
which one to connect them to.
Lonnie
On 8/3/06, Ryan Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am quickly outgrowing
http://gigaom.com/topics/att/
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Newsletters Down
I have 40 mbps to my house and it is not WiMax and I am the CEO of a
much smaller company. If that is the best a huge company like that
can do then they will not be a threat to anybody.
Lonnie
On 8/3/06, Jack Unger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://gigaom.com/topics/att/
--
Jack Unger ([EM
Lonnie, LOL. I knew as soon as that link was posted the dissing would start.
AT&T is a company to watch because they own spectrum and have capital. He
was clear in saying that he was using UL and not Wimax BTW. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Lonnie Nunweiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I guess the first question is--does it need to be encrypted? If not, GRE would
be a better choice (or IP-IP, if interoperability isn't as important). If it
does need to be encrypted, what are the encryption requirements?
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106
-Original Message-
F
All,
Then I would guess the following statement can be a little confusing. :-)
As quoted in the article;
"While AT&T’s WiMAX service is not publicly available, one tester
already has a review: Ed Whitacre, and he gives it an enthusiatic thumbs up.
He told GigaOM.com after the speech that he us
superpass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:29 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 900 MHz antenna
Where do I find a 180* sector?
Brian
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
There is no UL Wimax..maybe he is confused. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Dawn DiPietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ed Whitacre Loves His WiMAX
All,
Then I would guess the following statement can be a
Lonnie,
To clarify please, I assume your saying that you are awaiting your first
shipment of Tranzeo 900's for your own usebut others have already
deployed WAR Boards V3 or WRAPs with the Tranzeo 900 solution. Is that
correct?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMA
Of course there is... didn't you know the market has decided that
non-WiFi fixed wireless now means WiMAX?
-Matt
Brad Larson wrote:
There is no UL Wimax..maybe he is confused. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Dawn DiPietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:
Yep more WIMAX hype. He is using 802.11b. That is why he sees 5.5 megs.
And these are the people who sway public policy..
George
Brad Larson wrote:
There is no UL Wimax..maybe he is confused. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Dawn DiPietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
Whoa, bad assumption Rick. We would never be waiting for anything
from Tranzeo.
I was saying we are awaiting our first batch of SR9 for evaluation and
our own network, but that many of our customers have already tested
SR9's with our software, and they report excellent results with both
the WAR
HEHE. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ed Whitacre Loves His WiMAX
Of course there is... didn't you know the market has decided that
non-WiFi fixed wireless now means W
Speaking of waiting for Tranzeo,
If you do order from Tranzeo direct, then how long does it take to get
product?
How big are your orders?
ryan
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
Whoa, bad assumption Rick. We would never be waiting for anything
from Tranzeo.
I was saying we are awaiting our first batch
802.11b...I very much doubt that. Brad
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:45 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ed Whitacre Loves His WiMAX
Yep more WIMAX hype. He is using 802.11b. That is why he sees 5.5 megs.
Brad Larson wrote:
802.11b...I very much doubt that. Brad
Brad are you doubting that he gets 5.5 megs on 802.11b or that 802.11b
isn't wimax and he IS using WIMAX?
I don't think he has wimax at all. From what we see using 5 gig ofdm,
5.5 does not even show up on the charts. The only thing I
Wrong, airspan is shipping product
On 8/3/06 10:17 AM, "Brad Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no UL Wimax..maybe he is confused. Brad
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dawn DiPietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:30 PM
> To: WISPA General Li
I didn't know a WRAP board would power a 700mW radio. We've had limited
success with SR9s on WAR boards using 66 and 180 degree sector panels from
Superpass. Does anyone know of any narrower beamwidth sector panels that
don't weigh fifty pound or measure five feet in at least one direction? - cw
No. I'm doubting he's using 802.11b. I'm guessing he's getting 5.5 meg using
something else.
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ed Whitacre Loves His WiMAX
Brad Larson wrote
Again. There is currently no Wimax cert's for UL. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ed Whitacre Loves His WiMAX
Wrong, airspan is shipping product
On 8/3/06 10:17 A
When you say limited success, can you give examples?
I'm about to buy some and would like to know what kinds of issues pop up.
Currently I'm using Trango 900 and RF Linx 900 UDC's and know the
limitations of those radios, wondering how they compare to SR9's
penetration wise.
George
cw wrote:
Although there is no Wimax certified gear for UL, I would consider Wimax,
any gear that uses the Wimax chipset and MAC on a non certified band
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
Wrong, airspan is shipping product
When are they shipping Jeff?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Well that's why I needed clarification. I'm trying to figure out whether
Tranzeo 900 -> WAR/WRAPs AP is a good solution or stay with a pure StarOS or
Mikrotik AP-Client solution.
Thanks Lonnie,
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482
Founding Member of WISPA
-
Pick your busiest sector and put a smaller sector in there. As you are out
and about move customers over to that system. Once you get them moved put
another sector in the other area and move customers to that. Remember to
use different essids and channels (though I've reused channels). Leave
So are you guys setting a modem up with each router? Or are you just
praying that accidental misconfiguration aren't going to lock you out
until a tech can drive there and handle it locally?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Ron Wallace wrote:
Marlon is right-on here, since I have started
There are no new WRAP models on the market
and due to AMD discontinuing the SC1100 CPU, the current WRAP models have a
limited life. I have it on good authority that there may well be a replacement (with
a much faster CPU) this side of Christmas ;)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailt
When I have order from Tranzeo direct it usually takes about 2 weeks.
I've only ordered from them 3 times, first was a 10 lot of TR5a the next
two were 20 packs of TR-CPE90s. I usually order from Electro comm
anymore because I get it in a couple of days if they have it in stock.
Sam Tethe
[Firmware Version] AP 1p11H8002D03100301 [Checksum] EF3391FF
[Device ID] 00 01 DE 00 31 C7 [Base ID] 1 [AP ID] 2
[System Up Time] 686 day(s) 16:07:36
[Radio Temperature] 50 C
Here's the question Should I upgrade the AP to new firmware, or leave it
alone and maintain proof that a Trango AP w
5 days from BC to Ontario
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
office 905 349-2084
Emergency only Pager 905 377-6900
skype cajeptha
Ryan Spott wrote:
Speaking of waiting for Tranzeo,
If you do order from Tranzeo direct, then how long does it take to get
product?
How
I have almost no clue. We've had little time to play with them and I have no
frame of reference. We've never used 900MHz before. The throughput is full
802.11 at links in the high eighties. There doesn't appear to be much
foliage penetration as close as a mile. At an eighth mile, we can get a
s
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> [System Up Time] 686 day(s) 16:07:36
Don't bother to upgrade your firmware, unless there's some massive
problem that the new firmware will address.
That's generally my rule, at least. I'll do upgrades for security
purposes on our servers, but wireless gear rarely gets upgrad
Good point, I didn't mention I'm in the US which I am sure what adds the
extra delay to the arrival.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Carl A Jeptha wrote:
5 days from BC to Ontario
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
office 905 349-2084
Emergency only Pager 905
41 matches
Mail list logo
