Have you tried the Shireen dry gel? I’m addicted.
Stays dry and easy to work with until it gets wet. IF there’s a problem that
allows liquid into the cable it self seals the hole. Pretty cool stuff.
I do wish they had a better packaging system. I really miss the “rabbit pull”
mechanism
This stuff is spooled because it is too fat and stiff to stuff into the
box and think it will come out nicely. I have fewer snags, etc., with
the spooled wire than the other boxes we use.
On 1/24/2014 7:41 AM, Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181) wrote:
Have you tried the Shireen dry gel? I’m
Anyone has any experiece with products for this application?
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Marlon,
Is the Shireen Dry Gel cable also shielded? Do you have a part/product # for
it?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181)
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:42 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
You can get it either way, shielded or not.
Compare them here:https://www.shireeninc.com/osc/cables/cat5e.html
https://www.shireeninc.com/osc/cables/cat5e.html
On 1/24/2014 12:43 PM, Kevin Owen wrote:
Marlon,
Is the Shireen Dry Gel cable also shielded? Do you have a
part/product # for
Great.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Scott Reed
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 9:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] outdoor shielded cable for installs in a box
You can get it either way, shielded or not.
Gino,
Can you be more specific? I came from a regional hospital chain, and
they did everything from their downtown Data Center, and all hospitals
had gig connectivity. Even the bar-code readers had serial to Ethernet
extenders, so even the serial scanners were IP to the servers.
Eric
Looking for a way for remote Radiology Dr can use low BW Internet connections
(5-10 Mbps) for remote PACS reading,
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
No, it is not.
(Which means the warranty is VOID for his CPEs...)
Josh Reynolds :: Chief Information Officer :: SPITwSPOTS
:: Ubiquiti Certified AirMax Trainer ::
On 01/24/2014 08:43 AM, Kevin Owen wrote:
Marlon,
Is the Shireen Dry Gel cable also shielded? Do you have a
part/product # for
INTERESTING!
I didn't know shireen made a shielded version. That's one reason we've
only used the d-gel for very certain things. It's not listed on our
primary vendor's site (streakwave).
Thanks for the find/info!
Josh Reynolds :: Chief Information Officer :: SPITwSPOTS
:: Ubiquiti
Here is the product I ordered after being pointed there by Scott.
[https://www.shireeninc.com/osc/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/50x/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/d/c/dc-1041_2.gif]
Outdoor CAT5e FTP Shielded - Gel Filled - Outer Jacket - 1000ft Spool
DC-1041
Kevin
From:
Toughcable all the way. The greatest products come from people who learn
from big mistakes
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Does anyone know if or how I can force a Greenpacket OX-350i to run at
10/Full? We swapped a customer from UBNT to wimax on a long cable run and
we need to force it to 10 megs.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
Have you tried setting this up with snmp? I have some of these out in the
field and have fortunately not encountered this problem. It might be worth
a shot to look through the mibs to see what can be accomplished.
Mark Spring
Systems Analyst
New Knoxville Telephone Company
301 W. South St.
New
We have used r admin for years one time charge for server software for
computer remote free
On Jan 23, 2014 9:56 AM, James Howard ja...@litewire.net wrote:
We have a somewhat similar situation. One of our CSRs moved to Texas
(actually moved back since was originally from Texas) last year. We
Hi everyone. Been awhile since Ive been here, so not sure if this is a
redundant topic or not.
Anyone got experience with Mikrotik on their newer Multi-Core platform, using
as a Core Router for interconnecting multiple Gig backbone connections (w/ BGP,
OSPF, Queues, Firewalls, VLAN tagging)?
The new CCRs can do everything you need. And limiting 100Mbps or 200Mbps
customers is no problem.
We have them running BGP, OSPF, MPLS, PPPoE, firewalls, queues, etc. and
they just hum along without any performance issues.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Tom DeReggi
It sounds like his question is more geared toward very high bandwidth
applications core routing for a multigigabit network, or datacenter
type operations.
Josh Reynolds :: Chief Information Officer :: SPITwSPOTS
:: Ubiquiti Certified AirMax Trainer ::
On 01/24/2014 12:56 PM,
FYI.. the current ROS (6.x) does have limitations on most processes being
single threaded.
Supposed to get fixed i.e. become multi threaded in the near future.
Additionally each port has 1 core dedicated to it.. Which under certain
circumstances is a good thing, and not so good under other
Not sure if this is still the case, but I remember people saying BGP is
limited to a single core.
Depending on the number of peers, this could definitely cause some
convergence issues.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent:
What ranges have people been seeing with the ePMP equipment and subscriber
reflector while still getting full modulation?
--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036
___
Wireless mailing list
Replaced an aging powerrouter 732 with a CCR-1036. Set up as a
transparent bridge for traffic shaping. Passing 478M peak with 8200
interface bridge filter rules and 8000 queue tree entries, cpu
utilization peaks at about 50 and all 36 CPUs are in use according to
/system resource cpu print
We're very familiar with PACS. Not sure what if anything you need to do
unless the network is congested. Typically the remote user will either have
a pptp or ipsec tunnel back to the server/network. The bandwidth the remote
user has available to them (at home, hotel etc.) will obviously vary
Take a look at Riverbed steelhead and their software/appliances.
They are very open to loaning you equipment for weeks on end for
testing. The setup is so simple it is not even funny.
http://www.riverbed.com/products-solutions/products/wan-optimization-steelhead/
ryan
On 1/24/14 2:46 PM,
Sam,
Thats quite impressive, to be able to support that many queues and filter
rules. So apparently, those key services must be multi processor.
That is good to learn.
Eric,
Regarding single core apps. It may not matter all that much if an app is single
core, if it can use a unique core.
My
I just ran a test across an AirFiber link with 384 byte packets. The
interface shows it passing about 650Mbps going from an i7 x86 to a CCR with
existing Internet traffic.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.netwrote:
Sam,
Thats quite impressive, to be able to
Which is pretty close to the limit for an AirFiber, based on our earlier
testing w/ small-ish packets.
Josh Reynolds :: Chief Information Officer :: SPITwSPOTS
:: Ubiquiti Certified AirMax Trainer ::
On 01/24/2014 05:12 PM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:
I just ran a test across an AirFiber
On 01/24/2014 07:20 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Has anyone tested how small the average packet size can be and still
achieve theoretical wirespeed, in a simplified configuration over a
single port?
1Gbps FDX, can 90% of that be acheived with 384k avg packet size?
I hate to be that guy, but have
28 matches
Mail list logo
