Reboot?
Other than that I'm not sure. You should be able to have multiple
connections though -- unless someone got in that shouldn't have been.
In which case change password, reboot is probably the fastest way out.
Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570)
If you have one of those sessions that hang out there even though the
PC was melted 6 months ago...I haven't seen it cause any problems.
Butch suggests the same.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM,
Thanks..
I was hoping that there would be a better way ... something like clear
connection .type command..
---rather an obscure but realistic situation---
ROS 5.x , Winbox connection can cause as much as 50% increase in CPU
utilization.
This gets to be of concern on core
I think you can go into connections in the firewall and delete the
appropriate connection for the winbox user. That should drop them.
On 01/23/2012 10:01 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Thanks..
I was hoping that there would be a better way ... something like clear
connection .type command..
Yeah I know it's not a good solution for a production router, that's why
I said it depends on your situation... this is also why we don't use
WinBox :)
Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312
On 1/23/12 1:01 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Thanks..
I was
I don't know if this works for winbox sessions, but for ssh/telnet...
[admin@gw] /system script job /system script job
[admin@gw] /system script job print
# SCRIPT OWNER STARTED
0 admin jan/23/2012 19:45:24
1
Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP
address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1
static address, so why not more than 1 dynamic address?
On 11/02/2010 01:15 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
How do I create a subinterface on an ethernet port
You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface. You'll need to do
vlans.
On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net wrote:
Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP
address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1
In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik
On 11/15/2010 03:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface. You'll need
to do vlans.
On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, "Matt Jenkins" m...@smarterbroadband.net
wrote:
Ok simplification of
A bit more detail…Matt also needs both DHCP clients to operate from the same
source MAC address.
I sent him a solution that uses two MAC addresses on the same physical port and
does not involve VLANs, although its obviously of no use because it does not
meet his requirements.
What MikroTik
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?
A bit more detail…Matt also needs both DHCP clients to operate from the same
source MAC address.
I sent him a solution that uses two MAC addresses on the same physical port
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote:
In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik
You cannot do multiple dhcp-clients, either (which is what you'd need).
--
* Butch Evans
In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one dhcpc
on each bridge?
On Nov 15, 2010 7:00 PM, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote:
In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik
You cannot
I think Chupaka has posted on the MikroTik forms about having luck doing
by turning RADIUS on for DHCP requests, and then setting up a freeradius
server to handle the assignments. You can set up freeradius to match
just about anything. Not the easiest thing in the world, but...
-Kristian
On
You cannot add a single interface to multiple bridge's.
My failed solution I provided to Matt did involve adding ether1 to a bridge,
then setting auto-mac=no and admin-mac on the bridge to something other than
ether1.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
In
I think you guys are overlooking his statement that he does not control the
DHCP server, and was looking to add multiple DHCP *clients* on a single
interface using the same MAC in the DHCP requests.
A few of us have stated multiple times is not currently possible with MikroTik.
The solution
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one
dhcpc on each bridge?
Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more than one bridge.
--
Not sure, was a guess.
On Nov 15, 2010 7:42 PM, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one
dhcpc on each bridge?
Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more
If you mean like eth0.1 and eth0.2 then you need to use a vlan switch,
else once its on the wire, there is no way to know what comes from
who. It would be best to place another multi port router inline to
give you physical ports, or use vlans.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Matt Jenkins
, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is
current? Does that only apply to Linux kernels?
Greg
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
I have been systems and networking since about 1980. Some
, 2010 3:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
Personally I very rarely use the latest and greatest of anything. Be it
software, computers, cars etc.
Let someone else work out all of the bugs :-).
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Greg Ihnen os10ru
: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
Personally I very rarely use the latest and greatest of anything. Be it
software, computers, cars etc.
Let someone else work out all of the bugs :-).
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Greg
Honestly, how could I let that one go?
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
Best response ever.
Josh
-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
Personally I very rarely use the latest and greatest of anything
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
Personally I very rarely use the latest and greatest of anything. Be it
software, computers, cars etc.
Let someone else work out all of the bugs
, July 01, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is
current? Does that only apply to Linux kernels?
Greg
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
I have been systems and networking
With the double Teflon coated string?
All about the speed, man!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:15 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
NEW
This is why I'm still with 2.0
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:32 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
It's AbacusTitanium replacing
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 20:04, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote:
And whether they bother to power them up and test them prior to shipping
(which I do..every one)
Here's a sorta-related question (which probably should be on the
Mikrotik-Users list, but whatevs) - what's the
Don't forget that the 750 uses ether1 as a wan and protects it as such
(turns off cdp, etc).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston
I have been systems and networking since about 1980. Some of it for some
Fortune 100 companies.
The advice is, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do
not always know it is broken.
Keeping things all at 1 or 2 versions simplifies
What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is
current? Does that only apply to Linux kernels?
Greg
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
I have been systems and networking since about 1980. Some of it for some
Fortune 100 companies.
The advice is, if it
os10ru...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:53:11 -0430
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is
current? Does that only apply to Linux
If only we were so lucky...
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:24 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
I tend
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 09:54 -0500, David E. Smith wrote:
what's the recommendation for versions
and upgrades?
If you are using wireless:
4.10 for NEW deployments, ESPECIALLY if you are using nstreme.
For existing deployments, if you are doing ptmp and NO nstreme, then any
version that is
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do
not always know it is broken.
This is my second biggest complaint about Mikrotik. Their changelogs
really SUCK! The first biggest complaint is not fit for a public
Quick question for you guys...
When your upgrading from old version to a new version:
IE. I've got an old x86 2.9 which I'm going to replace with a RB1100 on
4.10
(I'm with Rob in that if it isn't broke, I'm not touching it.)
Do you usually export the config and paste in the new router?
Or can
. LOL
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 1:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
If only we were so lucky...
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 13:20, Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
Quick question for you guys...
When your upgrading from old version to a new version:
IE. I've got an old x86 2.9 which I'm going to replace with a RB1100 on
4.10
(I'm with Rob in that if it isn't broke, I'm not
Backup/restore only works same versions, same hardware.
Export can be made to work across versions, but the parameter names do
occasionally change. Quite annoying.
Also, if you do not strip out MAC addresses, the import will set the MAC
on your interfaces to be what is in the config. Not
: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
Backup/restore only works same versions, same hardware.
Export can be made to work across versions, but the parameter names do
occasionally change. Quite annoying.
Also, if you do not strip out MAC addresses, the import will set the MAC
on your interfaces to be what
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:20 -0400, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
Do you usually export the config and paste in the new router?
Or can I do a backup and restore with that big of a version difference?
It will need to be done via export/paste. Just do small sections at a
time, though, because SOME of
On 7/1/2010 2:00 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do
not always know it is broken.
This is my second biggest complaint about Mikrotik. Their changelogs
really SUCK! The
I won't knowingly go above 2.9.51 on my RB1xx boards. I finally got
some 4.x boards out there now because that's what they came with. If
the 4.x line is finally stable, maybe I'll raise my bar to that.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/1/2010
4.x has been good to me. Comes with the newer boards...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:39
They used to have x.y.z, but they abandoned that for some reason.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/1/2010 1:52 PM, Leon D. Zetekoff wrote:
On 7/1/2010 2:00 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
You do,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:02, Forbes Mercy forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:
Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its v4.5
not 4. Thanks for the help.
On 6/30/2010 11:56 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
We put a new Mikrotik 411 in service and it has v4 on it. We can't
I had the same problem with a rb450g. Have not figured it out yet.
David Blood
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
I had one about 6 months ago doing the same thing. I ended up formatting it
via the serial terminal and then upgraded the OS and all was perfect. Still
going strong as a matter of fact.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
I have seen some erroneous initial configurations. I can Winbox into a
router via the MAC Address (layer 2) and then look at the Firewall filters.
There is a drop rule that supposed to be for invalid connections, but is
missing the invalid connection setting. So it drops all connections.
Disable
Most everything I get now has 4.5. Works just like the 3.x stuff did.
If it has a serial port, see what Hyperterminal shows during boot. I
have had a couple of 411R come in DOA.
Forbes Mercy wrote:
Dammit I hit send before changing the subject line Oh and its v4.5
not 4. Thanks for the
I thought they are calling 4.1 the stable release?
Greg
On Jun 30, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
Most everything I get now has 4.5. Works just like the 3.x stuff did.
If it has a serial port, see what Hyperterminal shows during boot. I
have had a couple of 411R come in DOA.
4.10 is now the stable. (4.1 is nine revisions prior to 4.10 in MTs
numbering) Takes a while for it to get through the distribution
channels, so many are coming in with 4.5. I had some come in last week
with 3.23, so it depends on how many the distributor ordered and what
the demand has
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 20:45 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
4.10 is now the stable. (4.1 is nine revisions prior to 4.10 in MTs
numbering) Takes a while for it to get through the distribution
channels, so many are coming in with 4.5. I had some come in last week
with 3.23, so it depends on how
Why you take a RouterOS class :) But regardless, if you ahve a MT
client, it will set the TX and RX speeds for the clients by default.
YOu can set that by MAC as well, so you can control the bandwidth from
the AP to the CPE.
* ---
Rate-limiting. But only works with MT clients. (i.e. not other WiFi
clients)
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:
I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help
but notice the options in the wireless tab for:
Default AP Tx
AP TX rate works on any client, but you have to have MT for the client
TX rate .. :)
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:22 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote:
I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help
but notice the options in the wireless tab for:
Default AP Tx Rate:
And
Default Client TX Rate:
These 2 options set default rates for how much bandwidth is
this with hotspot, but this
is not for hotspot function.
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:22
MT Queues
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
From: Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:58 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
What is the best way to provide speed
, but this
is not for hotspot function.
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12
Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 4:14 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
RADIUS and PPPoE.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Cameron Kilton
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:06 PM
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:05 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote:
What is the best way to provide speed limit per clients where they are
not all MT clients?
This can be done via queues. That's a better solution than the layer2
approach anyway (sort of).
I would like to have something setup where
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:46 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote:
I like the idea of a dynamic queue is there a way to create dynamic
queues for connected clients?
One other method I just thought of is PCQ. PCQ is a queue type that
will allow you to classify a customer by IP address (in mangle) and
Yes, by creating a mangle rule for the mac address and mark the packets
then a queue rule to rate limit by packet mark I believe
Mike Goicoechea
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Jenkins
Sent: Friday,
Kind of like this:
/ip firew mang
add action=mark-packet chain=prerouting comment= disabled=no
new-packet-mark=\
desktoppackets passthrough=yes src-mac-address=00:02:B3:8C:18:E4
/que simp
add burst-limit=0/0 burst-threshold=0/0 burst-time=0s/0s comment=
direction=both \
disabled=no
66 matches
Mail list logo
