om: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Wars '08
> Matt Liotta wrote:
>
>> Anyway, that is a silly question. Here is a better one. I am currently
>> paying
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Wars '08
On Mar 18, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I generally stay out of these things, but I have some quest
On Mar 18, 2008, at 1:11 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
>
> Where are you getting your gear? That's roughly 90% less than any
> price
> I've ever been quoted. Heck, that's cheaper than a lot of the used
> units
> on eBay - and that's just empty chassis, not even including line
> cards.
> Are you
On Mar 18, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I generally stay out of these things, but I have some questions in
> order to
> answer your question:
>
> 1. You are referring to used Cisco pricing, right?
Yes
>
> 2. How much throughput do you require the router to handle?
Matt Liotta wrote:
> Anyway, that is a silly question. Here is a better one. I am currently
> paying around $3k for Cisco 12008s that are fully redundant, can
> handle today's full tables (i.e. greater than 256,000 routes), route
> at line speed, support MPLS, etc. Can you name any solution
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On
> Behalf Of Matt Liotta
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:55 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Wars '08
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:36 PM, David E. S
cost.
Regards,
Jeff
ImageStream
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Wars '08
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:36 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
&g
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Wars '08
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:36 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
> Cisco gear is well-supported and pretty darned solid, but is often
> many
> times as expensive as the next-best alternative, and the benefits
> don't
> always justify the d
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:36 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
> Cisco gear is well-supported and pretty darned solid, but is often
> many
> times as expensive as the next-best alternative, and the benefits
> don't
> always justify the drastically increased cost.
>
That is usually the argument, but it d
