So what kinds of distances are people currently going through trees,
and what kinds of signals, CCQ, throughput, etc. are you seeing? I guess
I'm looking for success stories. I need to sell this to the partners. I
know it can be done, and I'm fairly confident it will work in this
situation,
I've been fighting trees since I got into the wireless business back in '97.
IMHO, only lower frequencies will reliably serve a customer. I currently
have a few customers with some trees and they complain it cuts out. It boils
down to what quality of service you want to provide.
On Thu, Sep 16,
for awhile but noise floor went too high and
couldnt work around it so we pulled all our 900 equipment.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick White
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:50 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trees
, September 16, 2010 3:05 PM
To: n...@atomsplash.com; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trees under half mile
At my house, I live in a hole with about ¾ mile of solid oak trees
between me and the tower. 2.4Ghz in the late spring (meaning good,
saturated leaves) I can run 4meg. When
About the only product that will work that low. What do you call decent
throughput? I think 2x requires 6dbm.
On Sep 16, 2010 3:40 PM, chris cooper ccoo...@intelliwave.com wrote:
Ive never deployed Canopy 900. Vendor materials say it will work at a 3 db
C/I. Can you keep a solid connection
...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of chris cooper
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 12:43 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trees under half mile
Ive never deployed Canopy 900. Vendor materials say it will work at a 3 db
C/I. Can you keep a solid connection w/ decent throughput at that ratio
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
At 9/13/2010 10:57 PM, Jeromie wrote:
Sorry, when ever people talk about mesh they most often mean 1 radio
meshing.
First-generation mesh networks with one radio were awful. I didn't
think that was what Greg had in
At 9/14/2010 02:59 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
...
First-generation mesh networks with one radio were awful. I didn't
think that was what Greg had in mind. Second-generation mesh
networks separated the backhaul (meshing) from the user access, and
worked better. I actually like to use mesh
3.65 is limited in that you can only go as high as 99 feet I believe - someone
will correct me if I am wrong.
If you are using airmax - 2.4 should help
5ghz you may have some issues w/ trees however
My suggestion is a mix - I noticed that you have not mentioned 900mhz
900 and trees
900 won't do 10 megs.
Get on the tower with a Ubiquiti and the dual pol panels (powerbridge?) and
put up an omni or sector with 2.4 or 5. Depending on terrain all subs under
a mile should be fine.
On Sep 13, 2010 6:58 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
3.65 is limited in that you can
Would this be a good application for a mesh network? The towers feeding the
town from both sides, and a mesh through out town?
Greg
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Nick White wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a small town that is literally a 1 mile x 1 mile square. I have
two towers, one is North, 10
I have not seen mesh done on the cheap however
but open to some ideas for sure
On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
Would this be a good application for a mesh network? The towers feeding the
town from both sides, and a mesh through out town?
Greg
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:50 PM,
how about Ubiquti with Openmesh
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
I have not seen mesh done on the cheap however
but open to some ideas for sure
On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
Would this be a good application for a mesh network? The
Is there a way to do openmesh without having to give them revenue?
On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
how about Ubiquti with Openmesh
_
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com
I have a 'town' I have setup like that (just a large group of towns,
they call it a village). A couple PowerStation2's fed from 5ghz covers
it well. I also made a few key locations AP's. I take the clients AP's
and make them switchs, disabling the wifi. Then add a name on my units
for them to use.
I am unaware of the 99 limit. I actually have a set at 185 ft.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
3.65 is limited in that you can only go as high as 99 feet I believe -
someone will correct me if I am wrong.
If you are using airmax -
I can ask our licensing guy - he had seemed for some reason to think this was
the rule.
Thanks for the heads up.. worth asking again @ least.
I have a location I can use it now - (to get to my own home) - we are looking @
290 foot - or want to @ least
Thanks
On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:01 PM,
Correction, large group of houses.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
I have a 'town' I have setup like that (just a large group of towns,
they call it a village). A couple PowerStation2's fed from 5ghz covers
it well. I also made a few key locations
At 9/13/2010 07:02 PM, you wrote:
900 won't do 10 megs.
The new Ubiquiti M-series Airmax 900 MHz radios should do it. MCS10
in a 5 MHz quarter-channel is around 10 Mbps. A lower-loss path
could allow MCS11 or MCS12. While you can't synchronize sectors,
they look like they will outperform
With the low cost of Ubnt gear, why not run real relays? The area is
small enough to not need a unreasonable amount of relays.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
At 9/13/2010 07:02 PM, you wrote:
900 won't do 10 megs.
The new Ubiquiti M-series Airmax
At 9/13/2010 09:23 PM, you wrote:
With the low cost of Ubnt gear, why not run real relays? The area is
small enough to not need a unreasonable amount of relays.
What do you mean by real relays? A mesh or routed network or
whatever you want to call it is a set of relays. I may be missing
out
Backhauls?
Greg
On Sep 13, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 9/13/2010 09:23 PM, you wrote:
With the low cost of Ubnt gear, why not run real relays? The area is
small enough to not need a unreasonable amount of relays.
What do you mean by real relays? A mesh or routed network or
Sorry, when ever people talk about mesh they most often mean 1 radio
meshing. Multiradio relays generally do not benefit from most of the
mesh software. OSPF or rSTP works very well and are generally stable
and are generally supported and have many tools. I keep everything off
the radio I possibly
At 9/13/2010 10:57 PM, Jeromie wrote:
Sorry, when ever people talk about mesh they most often mean 1 radio
meshing.
First-generation mesh networks with one radio were awful. I didn't
think that was what Greg had in mind. Second-generation mesh
networks separated the backhaul (meshing) from
24 matches
Mail list logo
