Andy Budd wrote:
Seems like using i or span class=italic are pretty much the same.
No, here the span is worse. But it isn't a fair comparison since on one
hand you're using the wrong tool the right way, but on the other hand
you're using the right tool the wrong way. The class and id attribute,
El dom, 09-05-2004 a las 05:56, Bert Doorn escribió:
Really, what is the practical (as opposed to philosophical) difference
between the two methods?
Hi Bert,
are you asking why using tables for layout is stupid? :-)
http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
--
Manuel González Noriega
I'm having a problem with a textarea. It will display properly on the
page (which has three div columns) but when a person begins to input
data it automatically expands (to the right) so it occupies two columns
instead of just the middle column. I've never seen anything like this
before...
Hi,
are you asking why using tables for layout is stupid? :-)
http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
I know using multiple tables, nested n levels deep is stupid and results
in lots of excess code. So is using font tags etc. That's why I don't
design that way. But sometimes it is (to me)
I will be out of the office starting 10/05/2004 and will not return until
24/05/2004.
Hi, thanks for your email. I am away until 24 May. Please contact Dahlia
Docherty on x 6569 in my absence.
*
The discussion list for
YoYoEtc wrote:
Just wanted to make a comment - criticism perhaps - of the size of the
print/text I see on some web sites I have visited. Honestly, I am not
old and I almost need a magnifying glass to see some of it. Sometimes
it seems that the designer has tried to cram as much as is humanly
I will be out of the office starting 10/05/2004 and will not return until
24/05/2004.
Hi, thanks for your email. I am away until 24 May. Please contact Dahlia
Docherty on x 6569 in my absence.
*
The discussion list for
My monitor is set for 1042x768.
I understand what you are saying about fonts taken from an elementary
schoolbook. Those can be even more annoying. I am referring to fonts that
appear to be perhaps a 6 or 7 point size on screen. Honestly, you can
hardly read some of them.
What is
Is Firefox yet another browser? In designing sites, are there other
browsers I need to take into consideration other than Internet Explorer,
Netscape, Mozilla, Opera and WebTV?
At 03:45 PM 5/9/2004, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
Frankly, I've tired of all this endless dancing around font sizes
Hello YoYoEtc,
Sunday, May 9, 2004, 11:00:49 PM, you wrote:
...
Y What is ctrl+scrollwheel? I have a Logitech mouse with a scrollwheel in the
Y middle (which I rarely use - was raised in DOS times with old fashined
Y mouse grin)
Well this is just an very effective way to increase-decrease font
Can you post a demo link?
On 10/05/2004, at 12:14 AM, Vaska.WSG wrote:
I'm having a problem with a textarea. It will display properly on the
page (which has three div columns) but when a person begins to input
data it automatically expands (to the right) so it occupies two
columns instead of
So this means I only need to proof it in one of Firefox, Mozilla or
Netscape, not all three. Is that correct?
At 04:19 PM 5/9/2004, Felix Miata wrote:
Firefox, Mozilla and Netscape are all the same Gecko rendering engine.
Netscape 6/7 are simply older versions.
--
**
Tina
Thanks to everyone who submitted designs for the new WSG site revamp. We
will be post them online late this coming weekend for voting. The winning
entry will get instant glory, fame and a free book (Web Standards Solutions:
The Markup and Style Handbook). Well... maybe just the book...
Get your
I know using multiple tables, nested n levels deep is
stupid and results
in lots of excess code. So is using font tags etc. That's
why I don't
design that way. But sometimes it is (to me) unavoidable to
use a table,
because the alternatives just don't work consistently enough across
I wouldn't bother testing in WebTV at all. It has a tiny market share and pretty
limited functionality.
Jake
Quoting YoYoEtc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is Firefox yet another browser? In designing sites, are there other
browsers I need to take into consideration other than Internet Explorer,
On May 9, 2004, at 11:14 pm, Vaska.WSG wrote:
I'm having a problem with a textarea. It will display properly on the
page (which has three div columns) but when a person begins to input
data it automatically expands (to the right) so it occupies two
columns instead of just the middle column.
I respectfully disagree.
Based on the latest browser statistics 92% of all users have JavaScript
turned on. In addition, JavaScript enabled dropdown menus are still a
viable method of creating navigation systems. There are certainly a number
of older browsers that do not support the latest
That depends whether the menu is essential for navigation or not. If it
is just an added extra, but there are still other ways to get around I
would still feel free to use it!
Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
I'd stay away from it. The main reason being the use of Javascript in
there, effectively
Neerav,
Safari 1 and IE 5 account for most Mac users at this point, I would
think. You would want to make sure that the appearance of the menu
degrades gracefully, if you decide to go this way.
Fails in: NN4, Opera 6.05 on Windows. Safari 1.0, IE5.2 on Mac
Im happy enough with that
I wouldn't trust JS as far as I could throw it (can you throw code?) ...
but is there a statistic on how many users actually disable it in their
browsers? Is it possible to sniff that out, and if so, how many users
per group are we talking about?
-Ryan
And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put it as
an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do?
At 11:23 PM 5/9/2004, Ryan Christie wrote:
I wouldn't trust JS as far as I could throw it (can you throw code?) ...
but is there a statistic on how many users
I seriously just have to add, those toons are priceless :) excellent
resource Manuel!
-Ryan
Manuel González Noriega wrote:
El dom, 09-05-2004 a las 05:56, Bert Doorn escribió:
Really, what is the practical (as opposed to philosophical) difference
between the two methods?
Hi Bert,
YoYoEtc wrote:
And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put
it as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do?
Server-side languages such as PHP or ASP. JS is a client language
because it's dependant on a user's browser to supply the processing
power for
Hi All,
My first post to this list.
A couple of points regarding CSSCreator MultiMenu which may have been
overlooked.
Firstly JavaScript is only needed by IE for that menu, any of the other
supported browsers will function fine without it.
I like the menu because of the very small JavaScript
Thank you.
I am downloading them will try to configure on my
local server :-)
I will see if I could find them anywhere in a package,
as downloading through CVS won't be that easy for
everyone.
Regards Prayers,
-Meraj
--- Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know the W3C validator is
What do WSG members think of www.csscreator.com/menu/multimenu.php ? has
anyone used it in their sites? Im thinking of implenting it for a client
and replacing the existing ~30kb DHTML vertical menu, I believe it was
designed by a WSG member.
According to the author Browser Support is:
Works
26 matches
Mail list logo
