BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc.. built in FTP, HTML Tidy, FTP etc... You name
it, it's got it.
I use one called Editpad Pro. It has downloadable syntax for a number
of different languages, a dictionary, tabs which allow you to work on
multiple items at once, a project feature that allows to save
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie text editors
BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc.. built in FTP, HTML Tidy, FTP etc... You
name
it, it's got it.
I use one called Editpad Pro. It has downloadable syntax for a number
of different languages, a dictionary, tabs which allow you to work
Glad to help!
It honestly is the best ever coder I have used.
It is true that for Server Side Scripting - it isn't as helpful as it is
for HTML.
But is is really advanced in that, when you have a document - for
example a PHP document, like below:
?
php php php
php php php
php php php
php
I haven't even heard of TSW coder before - but it looks pretty good.
The built-in code validators look really handy - especially for
bug-hunting.
Thanks for the link!
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:35:31 +1100, Chris Stratford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad to help!
It honestly is the best ever
No Problemo Jason!
The code validator is odd, when you click on a HTML element in the
source, it will show up in the status bar if its valid etc as well.
I havn't really used the validators much, but i know they are there
because before I wrote up teh little snippet, i was looking through the
Actually that's nothing new. Many of the better editors will do that.
The reasons I switched were 1) I was using PHP and so many of the nice
things like the built in HTML/CSS Validator. 2) Besides syntax
highlighting, it doesn't really support PHP (as in being able to parse
it on the fly)
Sorry going to have to stop you there again...
Alan Trick wrote:
1) I was using PHP and so many of the nice things like the built in
HTML/CSS Validator.
I dont get what that means...???
Maybe you mean its redundant?
Maybe so, but its a feature never the less...
2) Besides syntax highlighting,
Even Dreamweaver's code editing mode does this (context-sensitive syntax
highlighting). There's been a good deal of derogatory commentary about
Dreamweaver recently, but as a web IDE I think it's fantastic. Where people
get into trouble is by relying solely on WYSIWYG mode. I rarely use WYSIWYG
Hi all,
First of all, It¹s always you writing the code, not the program ;-)
Anyway on the Macintosh these editors rock:
BBEdit: see http://www.barebones.com/index.shtml
Not cheap, but worth every penny IMHO, Textwrangler is now a free download
as an alternative.
BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc..
Title: Message
I have been writing
html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and
non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2,
is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? )
and where should I
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards (
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? )
Eh, I won't suggest it to beginner - skilled coder knows all the
gotchas, but beginner may just stuck with the WYSIWYG and do it badly.
Everebody in our workshop works with PSPad on almost everything.
If you want to try WYSIWYG I'd suggest trying NVU...
and
Hi,
Here's a bit of what I've learned jumping from editor to editor.
1) Don't pay for and editor, unless your filthy rich or can freeload one
off a company you work for. There are free alternatives that are at
least as good as the one's you pay for.
2) WYSIWYG (point and click) is pure evil.
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul wrote:
is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips on
accessibility and standards compliance.
Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :),
I'd suggest you
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Cummiskey
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:12 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize
how inaccessible
True, provided your editor isn't WYSIWYG.
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web
Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan,
...
Alan Trick wrote:
1) TSW Webcoder: Not bad for newbies. It requires regristration to
get rid of the popup things which is anoying. It is basically for
HTML/CSS coding only. It has no support for server-side scripting
like PHP or ASP besides serverside
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I
start for
I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then
perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a
good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without
being limited by some software. Notetab or notepad is fine.
Bruce Prochnau
On 1/19/05 3:55 PM, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then
perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a
good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without
being limited by some
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:41:40 +1000, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :),
I'd suggest you just start validating your pages.
Figuring out those fixes will teach you a lot, and from there you can
move on to Accessibility
Chris Stratford wrote:
Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan,
... snip
I LOVE TSW WebCoder.
Built in FTP is Excellent!
Built in Project Manager - with Status reports, To Do Lists, Full
Project Upload
Built in Server Mapping.
Preview in IE and Mozilla - only for HTML coding, or if your server
mapping...
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I
start for
25 matches
Mail list logo
