I've found a 'bodge' using the faux column thing. Repeated a "wrapper"
background image for the body and it covers a multitude of sins!On 9/28/05, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed one other thing worth mentioning on the charismalab site.Your container div with the background
Yes, I noticed that too and was trying to sort it out earlier today without any success whatsoever. Thanks for the advice!
On 9/28/05, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed one other thing worth mentioning on the charismalab site.Your container div with the background gets cut of
I noticed one other thing worth mentioning on the charismalab site.
Your container div with the background gets cut off at the bottom of the
first page length (in Firefox using 1024x768 resolution). I haven't
gone through your CSS as I'm supposed to be working right now, but I'm
guessing that
On 9/28/05, Reeka Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But doesn't that depend on what you're using the bold tag for? There are
> times, for instance - when you might want something to appear bold
> visually, but it wouldn't need to be spoken louder/emphasized for a
> screen reader, which - if I'm not
I've read in several places that yes, screen readers ignore < b > and <
i >. However, as I don't have a screen reader, nor do I know any
facilities with one that I could use for testing purposes - I really
have absolutely no idea. lol.
Christian Montoya wrote:
Oh, it *is* valid. I was mistak
Oh, it *is* valid. I was mistaken... I'll have to remember that. How do screen readers handle < b > and < i > ? Do they really ignore those tags? Just wondering because I know screen readers tend not to follow the rules.
But doesn't that depend on what you're using the bold tag for? There are
times, for instance - when you might want something to appear bold
visually, but it wouldn't need to be spoken louder/emphasized for a
screen reader, which - if I'm not mistaken, reads differently
than it would normal tex
Christian Montoya wrote:
I don't think is valid. Just do another span, with {
font-weight:bold; }
tags are still valid in xhtml1.0 strict, but they don't posess any
semantic value, which is why moving to is the preferred mark-up.
**
The d
I don't think is valid. Just do another span, with { font-weight:bold; }And yes, the DL is much better.
On 9/27/05, Drake, Ted C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Adam
I just sent a message about your linking
colors and then looked at your source code. Here's another suggestion I
Hi Adam
I just sent a message about your linking
colors and then looked at your source code. Here's another suggestion I
would make for you.
The Energetics of Charismastrong>
Delegates are introduced to Charismaspan>
Hi Adam
On a side note, I like the blue colors but
I get confused as a user with your use of orange on charisma throughout the
page. I keep thinking it is a link. Your actual links are white, the same color
as the text.
I find the site difficult to read and
explore. I would at lea
Validated the pages. Most were fine, actually, but there was a shocker
where I'd not closed a whole load of links and that was the page that
was really mis-behaving!! Thanks, again
AdamOn 9/26/05, Adam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, Christain. I didn't think of doing that.
Adam
On 9/
Thanks, Christain. I didn't think of doing that.
Adam
On 9/24/05, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the problem here might have to do with the fact that your XHTML is invalid. Please run every page through the validator and fix all the errors. There are definitely elements on
I think the problem here might have to do with the fact that your XHTML is invalid. Please run every page through the validator and fix all the errors. There are definitely elements on every page that have not been closed, and I think they are causing all the problems.
On 9/24/05, Adam Morris <[EM
HELP! I've just done a site for http://www.charismalab.com. Everything
is great for Windows PC, Firefox, Safari BUT the client is looking at
the site on her Mac OS 9 IE 5 and it's not right. I've use the import
to use a separate style sheet which helped massively but there are some
things that I ju
15 matches
Mail list logo
