Steven Clark wrote:
I think you may have the wrong end of the stick on what the initial
post was about. Someone wanted to point out that a site was badly made
and another suggested the sending of this document. All I am
suggesting is that in that circumstance it is neither professional nor
in
Hi all,
If you have any specific concerns please forward them to
info@webboy.net or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll just mention that you can't write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as it's
a closed list and you'll be rejected posting to it unless you are
subscribed. Sorry Mark :(
I am working on another form
To quote Jixor:
So you are the one in error. In the future if you are going to start a
debate type topic make sure to make your point clear. Seeing as you have
created it make sure to read through all the responses and consider what
people have said. Debates on etiquette are probably not
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Stanton
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:20 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Is sending abusive spam doing standards good or harm?
Hi All
The WSG Core group are with you guys 100
I think you may have the wrong end of the stick on what the initial post was
about. Someone wanted to point out that a site was badly made and another
suggested the sending of this document. All I am suggesting is that in that
circumstance it is neither professional nor in the best interest of
I've been reading my digests after a small holiday and I came across this
link posted a few days ago for moronic designers to be sent. Is this really
a good idea?
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~night.owl/morons.html
I mean I'm pro web standards etc and in all honestly I'd read the first bit
Steven, I agree with you.
The message about web standards is important, but pages like the one
linked to only serves to aggravate and insult.
Companies or individuals responsible for managing sites that are
poorly constructed do not need to be treated in this manner. A more
friendly, educational
Steven Clark wrote:
I only mention it because it was posted with next to no comment and
its really an important issue.
It's quite possible that I either missed the email, deleted it, or it
was sent before I registered with this list. I had wondered why the
moderator had to send an email
Steven Clark wrote:
I've been reading my digests after a small holiday and I came across
this link posted a few days ago for moronic designers to be sent. Is
this really a good idea?
Of course it's not. It says a lot about the intellectual level and
elitist head firmly up my recharge socket
Hi All
The WSG Core group are with you guys 100% here. No foul language,
abuse, negativity or other offensive behaviour will be tolerated on
the list. We do our best to keep an eye on things and deal with in
appropriate behaviour by contacting those concerned directly.
If you have any specific
I never meant to actually complain about anyone on the list or the list
itself, I apologise to anyone I've offended who may think I'm pointing at
them. I simply meant to point in the direction of what I see as a bad
practise of pushing the right wheelbarrow the wrong way. I know the
companies
Steven Clark wrote:
I've been reading my digests after a small holiday and I came across
this link posted a few days ago for moronic designers to be sent. Is
this really a good idea?
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~night.owl/morons.html
I mean I'm pro web standards etc and in all honestly I'd
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~night.owl/morons.html
Effective design principles would dictate that the whole point of the page
is to get the information to the target audience, but really does it? Its
offensively written, rude, long and even a bit angry
I've seen this page before and
13 matches
Mail list logo
