On 22/11/07 (00:32) Lea said:
>But some people prefer to have a quick squiz at the sitemap to see the
>totality of what the site contains.
>People are all different. Your navigation can be fine, and their
>mindset just wants to look at things differently.
I agree.
I am a user who quite likes s
Andrew wrote:
> Jermayn,
>
> That one person may find the sitemap useful does not mean that the
site
> navigation is broken - all that we do know for sure is that one person
> likes to use the sitemap.
>
> If everyone uses the sitemap, then the navigation could well use some
> work.
>
> Similar
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:07:16 +0900, Jermayn Parker wrote:
> The way I personally do sitemaps (if i decide to do them) is use the
> google sitemaps tool and keep it as a xml document and just make sure
> that your navigation is easy enough so people can access the content
> without getting lost.
XM
.
Good job
Julie Hale
Senior Consultant
SMS Managment and Technology
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:44 AM
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WS
ior Consultant
SMS Managment and Technology
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:44 AM
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG] SIte Maps?
But even
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:44 AM
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG] SIte Maps?
But even for a relatively small site having a sitemap will help some users find
what they want quickly. Those people are the same ones who will scan the index
of a b
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:44:15 +, Chris Taylor wrote:
> But even for a relatively small site having a sitemap will help some
> users find what they want quickly. Those people are the same ones who
> will scan the index of a book before flicking through the pages.
Yes, its got to be total 'broc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Taylor
Sent: 21 November 2007 14:44
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG] SIte Maps?
But even for a relatively small site having a sitemap will help some users
find what they want quickly. Those people are th
Chris Taylor wrote:
But even for a relatively small site having a sitemap will help some
users find what they want quickly. Those people are the same ones who
will scan the index of a book before flicking through the pages.
I've done that on this site: http://www.2plan.com/ despite it only
bei
or so. Does anyone think that is overkill?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Montoya
Sent: 21 November 2007 14:26
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] SIte Maps?
On Nov 20, 2007 7:04 PM, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL P
On Nov 20, 2007 7:04 PM, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In coming in late to the discussion:
>
> Do we really need a sitemap? I recently read an article were it talked
> that if all the seo was done properly and it was smallish, you
> probably do not need a sitemap.
>
I remember that
In coming in late to the discussion:
Do we really need a sitemap? I recently read an article were it talked
that if all the seo was done properly and it was smallish, you
probably do not need a sitemap.
On Nov 21, 2007 3:28 AM, Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to say: " Thanks for the
Just to say: " Thanks for the responses." All interesting.
Bob
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Hel
Designer wrote:
Any links or pointers to creating such an index/map would be most
welcome. Needless to say, standards and accessibility are important
. . .
I split them up in section-maps - table of contents - and produce them
manually. An automated process is probably the only practical solut
As far as "should obscure site link A be included?", the answer is yes.
Sitemaps should generally have a link to each and every link on your
website. I typically use just a standard unordered list (ul), and nest
it if appropriate.
Designer wrote:
I have never done a site map/index. I have Goog
Bob,
I usually just make my sitemap UL and LI driven as seen here:
http://www.stmarysgvl.org/sitemap/ or here:
http://www.woodcreekdental.com/sitemap/
Both of those sites are "database" driven and I've written a PHP script to
automatically produce the UL LI structure; if your site is not "databas
There is a small desktop app called "Xenu Link Sleuth", a google search
should find it.
This checks all links on your site and gives you a range of reports on
which ones are not working etc. It goes indepth and even provides links
of items such as images etc. It can also give you a list of all t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the sake of clarity; can you please confirm whether you are referring to
machine-readable site-maps for the benefit of Google etc.; or to
human-readable site-maps for the benefit of your human visitors?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
D]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2007 11:21
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] SIte Maps?
For the sake of clarity; can you please confirm whether you are
referring to machine-readable site-maps for the benefit of Google etc.;
or to human-readable site-maps for the be
For the sake of clarity; can you please confirm whether you are referring to
machine-readable site-maps for the benefit of Google etc.; or to
human-readable site-maps for the benefit of your human visitors?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Designer
Sent: Su
20 matches
Mail list logo
