Of Russ Weakley
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:55 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading
(22/12/09)
...Ahhh... I give up... there is no hope.
Russ
On 22/12/2009, at 10:46 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
Will HTML5 make the Web even more
...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Russ Weakley
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:55 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading
(22/12/09)
...Ahhh... I give up... there is no hope.
Russ
On 22/12/2009, at 10:46 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
Will HTML5
...@webstandardsgroup.org
]
On Behalf Of Russ Weakley
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:55 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading
(22/12/09)
...Ahhh... I give up... there is no hope.
Russ
On 22/12/2009, at 10:46 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote
From: Erickson, Kevin (DOE) kevin.erick...@doe.virginia.gov
You didn't give up did you Russ??? There is always hope if we choose to
see it right?
Please keep sending your links and don't let the bad apples spoil the
whole bunch :)
-
I think Russ needs to
: Thursday, 24 December 2009 5:09 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)
From: Erickson, Kevin (DOE) kevin.erick...@doe.virginia.gov
You didn't give up did you Russ??? There is always hope if we choose to
see it right?
Please keep
Rimantas,
How can you be so sure yourself about what you just posted regarding HTML5
vs. XHTML?
Thanks,
Jason
http://flexewebs.com/semantix
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Rimantas Liubertas riman...@gmail.comwrote:
Will HTML5 make the Web even more invalid?
Hi Rimantas
Why did I post this link? Because the article has an interesting take
on HTML5.
This does mean that I agree or disagree with the article. I hoped that
the article would lead to discussion and debate. I had also hoped that
any discussion or debate would be conducted in a
UNIFI Information Technology
agerasimc...@unioncentral.com
(513) 595 -2391
Russ Weakley r...@maxdesign.com.au
Sent by: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
12/22/2009 09:01 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc
Subject
Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light
...@webstandardsgroup.org
12/22/2009 09:01 AM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc
Subject
Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)
Hi Rimantas
Why did I post this link? Because the article has an interesting take
: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)
Hi Rimantas
Why did I post this link? Because the article has an interesting take
on HTML5.
This does mean that I agree or disagree with the article. I hoped that
the article would lead to discussion and debate. I had also
+1 for my weekly dose of Some links for light reading!
Jeremy Cabral
mobile: 0410 319 212
// skype: jeremycabral
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Jacques Halans hal...@gmail.comwrote:
Keep em coming Russ!
They are links for light reading after all, not gospel.
It obviously worked
I reckon HTML5 Nazis should chill our regarding the XHTML debates as HTML5
and XHTML are interchangeable terms.
Comments like this other guy made just add unnecessary negativity to the
whole thing.
Russ is a legend in his own right and no one should even attempt to cyber
bully him. ;-)
On Tue,
It obviously worked in provoking discussion.
Where do you see discussion there? Does keep them coming count as one?
I am all for them coming but I'd like some QA applied to them too.
(And I reserve the right to keep my opinion about the original commenter to
myself ;-)
Don't be shy. I will
I reckon HTML5 Nazis
I thought I was being rude there…
should chill our regarding the XHTML debates as HTML5
and XHTML are interchangeable terms.
How so? HTML5 has XML serialization, but that does not make HTML5 and XHTML
interchangeable in any way.
Comments like this other guy made just
Guys,
Shouldn't this be a separate thread?
Thx
Pete
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Rimantas Liubertas riman...@gmail.comwrote:
It obviously worked in provoking discussion.
Where do you see discussion there? Does keep them coming count as one?
I am all for them coming but I'd like some QA
Rimantas:
HTML5 guys keep saying that HTML5 supports XML syntax, hence us XHTML freaks
can use XHTML5 without having to complain about anything. Maybe have a
discussion with our friend Bruce Lawson who will essentially tell you the
same thing.
I think you are being a bit too harsh on our friend
Guys,
Shouldn't this be a separate thread?
Maybe there shouldn't be any thread in the first place. On the other
hand, my complaint
was about Some links.
Anyhow, I won't bother you anymore. My apologies to anyone offended.
Have a great holidays
and less Out of office replies next year.
Best
- Original Message -
From: Rimantas Liubertas riman...@gmail.com
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)
Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com
18 matches
Mail list logo
