Re: [WSG] Browser loading images issue
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Kristine Cummins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still having this issue as the client is contacting about images simply
not showing up but on refresh, they do. Frustrating as I don't know how to
solve this issue.
The page is http://www.cpwrehab.com/employee_listing.html
Stylesheet is: http://www.cpwrehab.com/styles.css
I noticed you have some CSS hacks like:
* html #container,
* html #headercontainer {
height: 1%; overflow: visible;
}
If you remove those, does this problem go away?
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.net
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
RE: [WSG] Browser loading images issue
Hi there, A bit left field, but I've had this issues *similar* to this before. It sounds like a network or ISP cache issue. Once it was a company proxy not grabbing the latest files from the webserver and serving up old code, the other time, an ISP was caching website data in their proxy to limit load on their webservers. In the 2nd instance, we had to call the ISP and have them manually remove the domain form their cache list. You may want to contact the ISP / hosting company to make sure the site isn't on a cache list. Worth a shot (the site looks fine for me here in New Zealand :) ) Paul *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Browser loading images issue
Hi Kristine, Are they inline images, or images from within a stylesheet? Are you able to provide a link to the site? Cheers, Adam From: Kristine Cummins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:55:03 -0700 Subject: Browser loading images issue Hi all, I'm still having this issue as the client is contacting about images simply not showing up but on refresh, they do. Frustrating as I don't know how to solve this issue. The page is http://www.cpwrehab.com/employee_listing.html Stylesheet is: http://www.cpwrehab.com/styles.css Thanks, Kristine *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Forms - Drop down width
Hello, I am working on a registration form and found a problem with how IE7 handles the drop downs. If I set a width in the CSS on the drop down, the text will not wrap and be cut off. I don't want to have to set a full width as the drop down is reminder answers and will be a bit long. Does any one know how to control the drop down width and to make it so the text wraps. Any help would be great! Example code is: form label for=questionReminder question:/label select name= id=question width=200 style=width:200px; optionSelect a Reminder Question/option optionWhat is the first and last name of your first boyfriend or girlfriend? /option optionWhich phone number do you remember most from your childhood?/option optionWhat was your favorite place to visit as a child? /option optionWho is your favorite actor, musician, or artist?/option /select /form Thanks Jamie *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] RE: Forms - Drop down width
AKAIK drop-downs are one line only, i.e. there is no way to make text wrap. The usual solution is to set the title attribute of each option element so that at least the user can hover over an option to see its full text, but it's a sub-optimal solution really. Regards, Damian Edwards Microsoft MVPhttps://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Damian.Edwards | ASP/ASP.NET Readify | Senior Consultant M: 0448 545 868 | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | C: [EMAIL PROTECTED]sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.nethttp://www.readify.net/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Likely, James A. Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 09:02 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Forms - Drop down width Hello, I am working on a registration form and found a problem with how IE7 handles the drop downs. If I set a width in the CSS on the drop down, the text will not wrap and be cut off. I don't want to have to set a full width as the drop down is reminder answers and will be a bit long. Does any one know how to control the drop down width and to make it so the text wraps. Any help would be great! Example code is: form label for=questionReminder question:/label select name= id=question width=200 style=width:200px; optionSelect a Reminder Question/option optionWhat is the first and last name of your first boyfriend or girlfriend? /option optionWhich phone number do you remember most from your childhood?/option optionWhat was your favorite place to visit as a child? /option optionWho is your favorite actor, musician, or artist?/option /select /form Thanks Jamie *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Chrome and Safari
Hi, Seeing as though Google's new Chrome browser uses the same rendering engine as Apple's Safari, would it be acceptable to test browser layout issues in Chrome and assume the same CSS solutions apply in Safari? Does anyone know of any distinct differences in CSS rendering between the 2 browsers? ___ Christian Fagan Fagan Design fagandesign.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] Chrome and Safari
From what I can tell Safari 3.1 for Windows and Google Chrome use exactly the same version of WebKit (according to their respective user agents anyway), so they should render identically. JavaScript DOM support is a different matter though. Regards, Damian Edwards Microsoft MVP | ASP/ASP.NET Readify | Senior Consultant M: 0448 545 868 | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | C: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 11:50 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Chrome and Safari Hi, Seeing as though Google's new Chrome browser uses the same rendering engine as Apple's Safari, would it be acceptable to test browser layout issues in Chrome and assume the same CSS solutions apply in Safari? Does anyone know of any distinct differences in CSS rendering between the 2 browsers? ___ Christian Fagan Fagan Design fagandesign.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari
May I ask how so, for future reference please? On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Damian Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: From what I can tell Safari 3.1 for Windows and Google Chrome use exactly the same version of WebKit (according to their respective user agents anyway), so they should render identically. JavaScript DOM support is a different matter though. Regards, Damian Edwards Microsoft MVP | ASP/ASP.NET Readify | Senior Consultant M: 0448 545 868 | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | C: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 11:50 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Chrome and Safari Hi, Seeing as though Google's new Chrome browser uses the same rendering engine as Apple's Safari, would it be acceptable to test browser layout issues in Chrome and assume the same CSS solutions apply in Safari? Does anyone know of any distinct differences in CSS rendering between the 2 browsers? ___ Christian Fagan Fagan Design fagandesign.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] Chrome and Safari
They are different engines from a JavaScript DOM perspective. So while they both support most of the same JavaScript DOM features, there are differences so you need to exercise the usual caution. I don't know what the differences are exactly but I've seen sites that have JS fail in Chrome that works in Safari 3.1. Regards, Damian Edwards Microsoft MVPhttps://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Damian.Edwards | ASP/ASP.NET Readify | Senior Consultant M: 0448 545 868 | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | C: [EMAIL PROTECTED]sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.nethttp://www.readify.net/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Patterson Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 12:06 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari May I ask how so, for future reference please? On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Damian Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From what I can tell Safari 3.1 for Windows and Google Chrome use exactly the same version of WebKit (according to their respective user agents anyway), so they should render identically. JavaScript DOM support is a different matter though. Regards, Damian Edwards Microsoft MVP | ASP/ASP.NEThttp://ASP.NET Readify | Senior Consultant M: 0448 545 868 | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | C: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.nethttp://www.readify.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 11:50 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgmailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Chrome and Safari Hi, Seeing as though Google's new Chrome browser uses the same rendering engine as Apple's Safari, would it be acceptable to test browser layout issues in Chrome and assume the same CSS solutions apply in Safari? Does anyone know of any distinct differences in CSS rendering between the 2 browsers? ___ Christian Fagan Fagan Design fagandesign.com.auhttp://fagandesign.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Question about presenting numeric percentages and accessibility.
Hi all, Just a quick question. I'm writing up a website for a simple brochure site, and the copy I'm provided with refers to something 1/3 of total or colour 2/3 of natural and so on. And it just occured to me, would Number Slash Number (ie; 1/2) cause any issue in regards accessibility, be it screen readers or poor reading or math skills (the correct term for this alludes me for the moment, I'm thinking dyslexia, but not sure that correctly accounts for all potential users). As such I wondered if the abbr tag might be appropriate, or if anyone has a better, more suitable sugestion? Many thanks, John Unsworth. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Question about presenting numeric percentages and accessibility.
i would use the unicode entity for fractions: http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/international/bylanguage/mathchart.html#fractions so, 2/3 would be pcolour #8532; of natural.../p Hi all, Just a quick question. I'm writing up a website for a simple brochure site, and the copy I'm provided with refers to something 1/3 of total or colour 2/3 of natural and so on. And it just occured to me, would Number Slash Number (ie; 1/2) cause any issue in regards accessibility, be it screen readers or poor reading or math skills (the correct term for this alludes me for the moment, I'm thinking dyslexia, but not sure that correctly accounts for all potential users). As such I wondered if the abbr tag might be appropriate, or if anyone has a better, more suitable sugestion? Many thanks, John Unsworth. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Question about presenting numeric percentages and accessibility.
What about writing it out: one-third, two-thirds, half? Henrik Madsen Generator +61 8 9387 1250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.igenerator.com.au On 16/10/2008, at 10:01 AM, John Unsworth wrote: Hi all, Just a quick question. I'm writing up a website for a simple brochure site, and the copy I'm provided with refers to something 1/3 of total or colour 2/3 of natural and so on. And it just occured to me, would Number Slash Number (ie; 1/2) cause any issue in regards accessibility, be it screen readers or poor reading or math skills (the correct term for this alludes me for the moment, I'm thinking dyslexia, but not sure that correctly accounts for all potential users). As such I wondered if the abbr tag might be appropriate, or if anyone has a better, more suitable sugestion? Many thanks, John Unsworth. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] Browser loading images issue
Hi all I am looking for tenders for 1. search engine sites both. .com.au and .com 2. .com.au classifieds site 3. News site both .com and .com.au Anyone interested on quoting please contact me Thanks Tony Paterson Tel: +61 3 5981 4457 This email (including all attachments) may contain personal information and is intended solely for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be subject to legal or other professional privilege. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake. If you have received it in error, please let us know by reply email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. Any personal information in this email must be handled in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects and may not be successfully replicated on other systems. We give no warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, please contact us immediately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristine Cummins Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:55 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Browser loading images issue Hi all, I'm still having this issue as the client is contacting about images simply not showing up but on refresh, they do. Frustrating as I don't know how to solve this issue. The page is http://www.cpwrehab.com/employee_listing.html Stylesheet is: http://www.cpwrehab.com/styles.css Thanks, Kristine -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristine Cummins Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 11:28 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Browser loading images issue I noticed that sometimes some images will not load upon visiting a page while others on the page will, but when I hit the browser's refresh button, the image will load. This was happening in IE, but no other browser. Anyone have any ideas how to fix this issue? Thanks, Kristine *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Question about presenting numeric percentages and accessibility.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:01 PM, John Unsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Just a quick question. I'm writing up a website for a simple brochure site, and the copy I'm provided with refers to something 1/3 of total or colour 2/3 of natural and so on. And it just occured to me, would Number Slash Number (ie; 1/2) cause any issue in regards accessibility, be it screen readers or poor reading or math skills (the correct term for this alludes me for the moment, I'm thinking dyslexia, but not sure that correctly accounts for all potential users). As such I wondered if the abbr tag might be appropriate, or if anyone has a better, more suitable sugestion? Why not enter the Unicode fraction characters directly? It's not easy to enter them from they keyboard, so what I usually do is enter them as references (e.g. frac34; or #8532; as Todd B. suggested) and then copy paste them from the browser window into my text editor. It makes the source HTML much easier to read. Here's an example. The section called Encodings has a 2/3 in it, and there's some other fractions floating around in there too: http://NikitaTheSpider.com/articles/ByTheNumbers/fall2008.html HTH -- Philip http://NikitaTheSpider.com/ Whole-site HTML validation, link checking and more *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari
Not from what I've seen - safari (pc based) can be fine, chrome not. I'd have to go through my history somewhat to link theese pages/sites but if you must have the proof... At the end of the day never assume 'just cos one works another similar will'. Chrome may be based on something, doesn;t make it work identical. My twin is based off the same genetics - but he's an asshole ;) Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Seeing as though Google's new Chrome browser uses the same rendering engine as Apple's Safari, would it be acceptable to test browser layout issues in Chrome and assume the same CSS solutions apply in Safari? Does anyone know of any distinct differences in CSS rendering between the 2 browsers? ___ Christian Fagan Fagan Design fagandesign.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Question about presenting numeric percentages and accessibility.
Could you use spans or divs (inline) to add title/other descriptive tags? I'm planning a voluntary site for a day nursery and am looking to make it perfect, as a portfolio piece but as a learning platform also. In other words I'd appreciate others more experienced opinions. Regards Jon Henrik Madsen wrote: What about writing it out: one-third, two-thirds, half? Henrik Madsen Generator +61 8 9387 1250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.igenerator.com.au On 16/10/2008, at 10:01 AM, John Unsworth wrote: Hi all, Just a quick question. I'm writing up a website for a simple brochure site, and the copy I'm provided with refers to "something 1/3 of total" or "colour 2/3 of natural" and so on. And it just occured to me, would Number Slash Number (ie; 1/2) cause any issue in regards accessibility, be it screen readers or poor reading or math skills (the correct term for this alludes me for the moment, I'm thinking dyslexia, but not sure that correctly accounts for all potential users). As such I wondered if the abbr tag might be appropriate, or if anyone has a better, more suitable sugestion? Many thanks, John Unsworth. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Jonathan Warner tel: 0800 043 8158 mob: 07823 550 813 web: www.thepixelforge.net skype: ThePixelForge 31 Cumberland Avenue Chandler's Ford Hampshire SO53 2JX ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
