Hello,
Just received my Apple MC226LL from this homepage , www.benefits188.com
It's so cheaper but genuine , I like it very much ,I paid it $740US couier
charges included , They have some other products. If you want to get one.
you can check it out
Cheers,
--
Cameron Singe
**
This is exactly the sort of spam we don't want here.
This user is now banned with extreme prejudice.
Please don't click the link as it will only encourage them!
Hopefully no one else will take this as a hint for what to post here, or
I will have to pull out the tactical nukes :(
warmly,
Lea
--
I don't think anyone wants to see your tactical nukes Lea :-)
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Lea de Groot
Sent: 12 August 2010 10:24
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [ADMIN} spam alert - Thread Closed Re
Hi Lea,
The message of that spam is very familiar. I received similar messages from
friends and a number of people I know in the past few months. It was very
uncharacteristic to receive this sort of email from friends so I emailed them
and learned that their gmail accounts got hacked and they
Maybe the guy genuinely won a Mac from that site and couldn't resist but
share the news with the rest of the world?! :-D
We will never know.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM, tee wrote:
> Hi Lea,
>
> The message of that spam is very familiar. I received similar messages from
> friends and a numb
What part of "thread closed" do people not understand?
Lea, I say we take off and nuke the entire list from orbit. It's the
only way to be sure.
Russ
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubs
Ryan Seddon wrote:
If you make an update to the manifest file it will
re-download every asset listed in the manifest.
You can split resources across multiple manifest files, though, as far
as I can tell, the you only get one manifest per page. Have you ever
tried caching pages which themselv
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
http://html5boilerplate.com/
Looks pretty good to me... what say ye?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
I find it works really well
minimal files & overhead with lots of addition life smoothing extras
(in my case *it* refers to profrontend template rather than boilerplate but
has same practices)
I would be interested to hear what others have to say too :)
- S
On 12 August 2010 12:57, Tom Livi
What is " profrontend template " ?
Tnx
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Un
Considering the link doesn't even look right in IE8, I'm not sure I'd use
it to build anything.
Dan Freeman
Webmaster & ERP Administrator
800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
www.lexi.com
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] O
Dan I would look past per-site design choices such as that.
and look into the neat and beneficial features which are many and various
(also the example in use there is outdated compared with the code on github)
the site has the initial release of html5boilerplate where as the github
repo is stag
I'm sorry to disappoint you guys, but an "HTML5 Professional Template"
with BROWSER DETECTION (those conditional comments in the markup) is
not a best practice.
- HM
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Sam Sherlock wrote:
> Dan I would look past per-site design choices such as that.
> and look into
I rather liked the conditionals around the body. What's not to like?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Hugo Mendes wrote:
> I'm sorry to disappoint you guys, but an "HTML5 Professional Template"
> with BROWSER DETECTION (those conditional comments in the markup) is
> not a best practice.
>
> - H
On 12/08/2010 14:55, Hugo Mendes wrote:
I'm sorry to disappoint you guys, but an "HTML5 Professional Template"
with BROWSER DETECTION (those conditional comments in the markup) is
not a best practice.
It's certainly ugly, but a very pragmatic way of having style fixes for
the various broken ve
On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
http://html5boilerplate.com/
Looks pretty good to me... what say ye?
Some useful ideas there, although I won't be using it "as-is."
Thanks for sharing.
Cordially,
David
--
*
Like the site says, it's "delete-key friendly" :-)
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
>>
>> http://html5boilerplate.com/
>>
>> Looks pretty good to me... w
List,
Here's a theory question ( i think) for ya. I'm working on a layout,
and am attempting to use and . Properly, I believe.
But as I look at my layout, I'm thinking "ok, i'll put an ID on this
section, and one on that section..." and I stopped and thought "Uh
oh... it's the same as i've always
Tom, I think the answer to that is semantics - div has no meaning. Id's
are there for you to manipulate the look and behaviour, the tags
themselves offer a way for third parties to glean meaning from the page.
e.g you could build an overview of a page by grabbing the first bit of
text inside ea
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Rob Crowther
wrote:
> You can split resources across multiple manifest files, though, as far as I
> can tell, the you only get one manifest per page.
>
Yeah that is a good point. Although doing so would require the person to
visit each page which has it's own man
20 matches
Mail list logo