RE: [WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

2004-03-31 Thread Mark Stanton
Hey Justin We recently did a project where we experimented with a number of navigational utilities I'm pretty happy with the end result. The site is visible at www.iih.org. There are four main navigational widgets through out the site; the top nav with 1 level of drop down, the breadcrumbs, the "

Re: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Ryan Christie
Amen to that brother. I agree with Christine and most of the others. Even if I take a billion art classes and devote the rest of my life to honing art skills, I will still be horrible compared to a slew of others whose design is immaculate but whose technical side is lacking. You can teach peop

Re: [WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

2004-03-31 Thread Ryan Christie
Well, at least your client wants tiered drop-down menus. My most recent client wanted, basically, a sitemap on the left side of every page in the site *AND* he wanted a horizontal top navigational bar in addition to it. My boss does wonders in dealing with fussy clients, and she convinced him t

RE: [WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

2004-03-31 Thread Jeff - Accessibility 1st
Sorry mate, here's the URL: http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/navigation.h tml#menus Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin French Sen

Re: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Universal Head
Warning: rant. The very fact that this is even in question with any designer is an indication of how degraded the title has become since computers hit the industry. Design was and has always been about communication and functionality - my degree in 84-88 was 'Visual Communications', not 'web desig

[WSG] This is picky, pardon the anal-ness

2004-03-31 Thread Ryan Christie
I've noticed in the past a few times, but now more frequently, that people are replying to one thread but using that thread's same header to reply to other messages. I'm sure that the ones doing this aren't using thread mode in their email clients, but it does affect some of us. I don't want to

RE: [WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

2004-03-31 Thread Jeff - Accessibility 1st
Hi Justin, I know what you mean. Here's a good place to start. Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin French Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2004 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

2004-03-31 Thread scott parsons
consider these multi level menus as a site map Do you need a sitemap on each page... is a site map useful on each page. you could easily construct a drop down menu with multi levels, but it may not be useful, or usable. But with a style switcher you could put a sitemap in the footer of each page.

[WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

2004-03-31 Thread Justin French
Hi all, I'm quoting for a client at the moment who seems to have her heart set on dropdown menus for the sites navigation. I've implemented such menus before, and am currently using a version of the Suckerfish menus [1], which is fine for a one-deep hierarchy, but it looks like she wants 3-4

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Justin French
Leo, On 01/04/2004, at 1:49 PM, Leo J. O'Campo wrote: To say that anyone concerned with accessibility should have JavaScript enabled **utterly misses the point**. Accessibility is about providing access to the content for the widest possible number of users, regardless of how they're accessin

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
Justin To say that anyone concerned with accessibility should have JavaScript enabled **utterly misses the point**. Accessibility is about providing access to the content for the widest possible number of users, regardless of how they're accessing it. Hmm.. well Justin your missing my point. I

Re: [WSG] Thead closed : Safari 1 & 2 side-by-side? (a little OT)

2004-03-31 Thread James Ellis
Hi Justin Support for Safari would be more appropiate on a Mac users list. Posts about how Safari supports the relevant standards are ok. Cheers James Justin French wrote: Just upgraded to OS X 10.3 from 10.2 last night, and whilst some of the new features in Safari are nice, I still need the

RE: [WSG] New Colour Schemer - draft - any suggestions?

2004-03-31 Thread Michael Kear
Title: Message Thanks Leslie.  I did know that table didn’t display properly in some browsers.  It’s a footer file that dates back to 18 months ago – antique.   I’m rebuilding my site using a new CMS I’m writing and a shopping cart I’m writing,  so I didn’t pay much attention to that part o

Re: [WSG] Safari 1 & 2 side-by-side? (a little OT)

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
Justin I'm not surprised that Safari (Jag) runs in Safari (Pan) because generally Safari is forward compatible software. What did surprise most of us loyal Mac users was that Safari 1.2 (Pan) wouldn't run in Jaguar. I use OS9/Jag/Pan each on their own disk drive in the same machine. Leo On W

Re: [WSG] Safari 1 & 2 side-by-side? (a little OT)

2004-03-31 Thread Andrew Dunning
On 31-Mar-04, at 9:28 PM, Hugh Todd wrote: My suggestion would be to install and use OmniWeb. It uses the Safari 1.0 engine. That's correct. The old Safari doesn't work because the rendering engine is actually embedded as a framework in the OS (so it can be used in other applications). OmniWeb

Re: [WSG] Safari 1 & 2 side-by-side? (a little OT)

2004-03-31 Thread Hugh Todd
Justin, Has anyone seen an article on this or managed to have Safari 1.0/1.1/1.2 running side-by-side on one system? My suggestion would be to install and use OmniWeb. It uses the Safari 1.0 engine. -Hugh * The discussion list for http://webs

RE: [WSG] New Colour Schemer - draft - any suggestions?

2004-03-31 Thread Thomas Meyer
Try this for a color picker that works on PC's. http://eyedropper.inetia.com/ it will give you the hex values for any color you put it on.   All the best, Thom Meyer       ---Original Message---   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 03/31/04 21:09:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Justin French
On 01/04/2004, at 11:24 AM, Leo J. O'Campo wrote: Unless there is a reason I am not thinking of, I'd think people who want accessibility would keep javascript enabled. To say that anyone concerned with accessibility should have JavaScript enabled **utterly misses the point**. Accessibility is a

[WSG] Safari 1 & 2 side-by-side? (a little OT)

2004-03-31 Thread Justin French
Just upgraded to OS X 10.3 from 10.2 last night, and whilst some of the new features in Safari are nice, I still need the old version 1.0 and/or 1.1 for testing purposes, since there were quite a lot of issues. I copied across the 1.0 app from my back-up, renamed it Safari 1, and placed it in

RE: [WSG] New Colour Schemer - draft - any suggestions?

2004-03-31 Thread Michael Kear
Yes, good idea Leo.    I think there’s a little flash gadget you can add to coldfusion pages that does that.  I’ll have a look for it.   Thanks.     Cheers Mike Kear From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo J. O'Campo Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2004 6

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
Patrick First PLEASE do not display my email address to the open list. Thank you. *cough* accessibility *cough* Unless there is a reason I am not thinking of, I'd think people who want accessibility would keep javascript enabled. Also don't forget that in some instances the specific setup/ca

Re: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Justin French
The only way to find a designer that is sensitive to what's required with standards, accessibility, CSS-based layouts, valid XHTML, etc is to find a web designer with ALL these skills, even if you don't take advantage of them all. They must be able to hand-code valid XHTML in order to have an

RE: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Mark Stanton
Hey Kay I wouldn't worry specifically about whether the designer currently up to speed on HTML & CSS. To the key character of a good web designer (apart from artistic talent) is that they respect their medium and their audience. If a designer shows any sign of getting upset about having their arti

Re: [WSG] Unwanted Visitors

2004-03-31 Thread russ weakley
>From now on, please reply directly to Jaime rather than to the list, as this is OT Thanks Russ > Jaime Wong wrote: >> >> Today I went to check my site statistic for fun and have a look at the >> Links from an external page (other web sites except search engines)". >> >> I saw a couple of susp

Re: [WSG] Unwanted Visitors

2004-03-31 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Jaime Wong wrote: Today I went to check my site statistic for fun and have a look at the Links from an external page (other web sites except search engines)". I saw a couple of suspicious links being displayed theresuch as companies who has nothing to do with web designing and adult sites.

RE: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread P.H.Lauke
> From: Leo J. O'Campo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] > A good point... but if someone elects to turn off javascript they do it > at their own disadvantage. *cough* accessibility *cough* Also don't forget that in some instances the specific setup/capabilities of machines is not up to the indiv

Re: [WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
Carlos It works in Safari on the Mac but breaks totally in IE5.2 Mac. I didn't check code but from the looks of the break I'd assume the normal IE hacks are needed. And I'd recheck the display flow rules and containment hierarchy. Leo On Wednesday, March 31, 2004, at 07:53 AM, Cb2 Web Desi

Re: [WSG] New Colour Schemer - draft - any suggestions?

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
Mike I think it would be more useful if it had a color picker along with the hex number input. Using hex number input alone doesn't work for those who don't know the hex numbers they need or would like to browser color schemes. I have been using hex values for color long before the web existed a

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
P A good point... but if someone elects to turn off javascript they do it at their own disadvantage. Leo On Tuesday, March 30, 2004, at 09:19 PM, P.H.Lauke wrote: And seeing most people use IE, you might as well use javascript. Whether or not people use IE has nothing to do with whether or no

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
P Your right... I blew that one in the details. Leo On Tuesday, March 30, 2004, at 09:14 PM, P.H.Lauke wrote: but that doesn't solve the original problem as far as I understood it. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See h

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
Nick I stand corrected... As I am a Mac user, where things are made to standards, I often forget that MSIE doesn't no how to render standards. ;-) ...just kidding. But we as a developer web standards community should proactively boycott MSIE. Leo On Tuesday, March 30, 2004, at 09:07 PM, N

Re: [WSG] Unwanted Visitors

2004-03-31 Thread Vlad Alexander \(XStandard\)
Hi Jaime, You are not alone. This is just another form of marketing (spam) that companies use. It's not only adult sites - we have been spammed this way from some of our competitors. Regards, Vlad Alexander XStandard Development Team http://xstandard.com - Original Message - From: "Jaim

RE: [WSG] My first CSS project

2004-03-31 Thread Leslie Riggs
Hi Teresa, Good going! Unfortunately, we can't evaluate your site if you don't give a URL ;) Leslie Riggs > I have recently redesigned my business web site using CSS. I was > looking for some feedback. > > The biggest obstacle I ran into was on the "about us " Page. I am > wondering if

[WSG] unsubscribe

2004-03-31 Thread Eileen Russell
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting hel

[WSG] My first CSS project

2004-03-31 Thread Teresa Carroll
hello! I have recently redesigned my business web site using CSS. I was looking for some feedback. The biggest obstacle I ran into was on the "about us " Page. I am wondering if I over used the "padding" command. When responding to use this e-mail address also! I am on the daily dige

[WSG] Unwanted Visitors

2004-03-31 Thread Jaime Wong
I think this is OT. Please forgive me. Today I went to check my site statistic for fun and have a look at the Links from an external page (other web sites except search engines)". I saw a couple of suspicious links being displayed theresuch as companies who has nothing to do with web design

RE: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Chris Keane
> You should make up a test that starts with typical graphical elements that > your company uses and perhaps a hand drawn mock up of a page. Have them > design first in fireworks or whatever your graphic design tool of choice > is the layout and then ask them to create a rough HTML of it. Then you

Re: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Sarah Sammis
> Hi guys, > [snip] > > So what am I actually asking? I'm interested in what you guys consider > reasonable to expect from a graphic designer who also does some > "overflow" html. What would you be looking for? What would you ask in > the interview? > > Thanks for any ideas, > K. > > > -- > Kay Smo

RE: [WSG] New Colour Schemer - draft - any suggestions?

2004-03-31 Thread Leslie Riggs
Title: Message >  http://afpwebworks.com/colourschemer/  is the address. (note the Australian COLOUR not the American COLOR)     NICE.  Handy tool!    One detail that I noticed while looking at it using Firefox 0.8, Moz 1.6 and Netscape 7.1, has to do with the table that contains the thre

RE: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Chatham, Will
I would be inclined to think that finding a designer with the skills somewhere between what Jeremy and Christine recommended would be best. Someone that has an aptitude for coding to a certain degree, yet has an artistic eye as well. I don't think you need a die-hard Notepad user, but I do think t

Re: [WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion

2004-03-31 Thread Cb2 Web Design
:) Just find out about BrowserCam some minutes ago ... Thank you Russ! - Original Message - From: "russ weakley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Web Standards Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion > Instead

[WSG] Updated CSS resource categories on WSG site

2004-03-31 Thread David McDonald
The Resources section of the WSG site has recently been updated, and the CSS Categories available now are: CSS Known Browser Bugs - http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat23 CSS Layout Examples - http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat10 CSS Tabs - http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/

Re: [WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion

2004-03-31 Thread Cb2 Web Design
Well, just find out about BrowserCam and used the trial to see the page: http://tinyurl.com/38xrr It seems that IE5.2/Mac is the worst case... :( - Original Message - From: "russ weakley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Web Standards Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 2

Re: [WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion

2004-03-31 Thread russ weakley
Instead of one screenshot, how about 23 screenshots: http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=55491 Click on the small screenshot to see full size versions. Russ > Russ, I'll appreciate if you can send me a screen shoot, please... thank > you! > > Too bad, I was hoping it could hold... >

Re: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Jeremy Flint
Have they ever used Dreamweaver without going into the WYSIWYG. Do they KNOW HTML? Could they code a site with nothing but notepad? - Jeremy Flint www.jeremyflint.com Kay Smoljak wrote: Hi guys, At work, we're about to hire a new graphic designer, as our guys are flat out. We're looking f

Re: [WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion

2004-03-31 Thread Cb2 Web Design
Russ, I'll appreciate if you can send me a screen shoot, please... thank you! Too bad, I was hoping it could hold... Any other browser/OS combinations ? Thank you all in advance. Carlos - Original Message - From: "russ weakley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Web Standards Group" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Letsky-Anderson, Christine
Hi Kay, I wouldn't worry too much even if your designers think Fireworks output is a good way to go. For years, we used table-based sites. All of our designers were taught Fireworks/Dreamweaver. Starting January 2004, we completely abandoned Fireworks. All of our new sites are being produced

Re: [WSG] :hover and accessibility

2004-03-31 Thread Tonico Strasser
Robert Moser wrote: How do screen readers handle the :hover pseudoclass? The main reason I'm wondering is in regards to CSS flyout menus. Typically these involve changing a display: none; on the normal element to a display: block; on the :hover pseudoclass of that element. FIR was deprecated d

[WSG] hiring a standards-savvy designer

2004-03-31 Thread Kay Smoljak
Hi guys, At work, we're about to hire a new graphic designer, as our guys are flat out. We're looking for someone with some markup skills as well as visual design, and as I'm the nominated "standards nazi" I'm charged with making sure their html and css is up to scratch. As this is primarily a

Re: [WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion

2004-03-31 Thread russ weakley
> Do you think it will hold? Or is it to clumpsy? Can someone tell me what > happens in a IE/Mac environment? MacIE - breaks badly. Three columns end up one under each other - seems to be a width issue. Can send screen shot if needed. Russ * Th

[WSG] CSS 3-col draft: Request for opinion

2004-03-31 Thread Cb2 Web Design
Hello one and all, I have been trying to create a 3-column layout using only CSS and avoiding fixed widths. I know there are a few ways of doing it, but that's me, always interested in re-inventing the wheel :) My approach can be seen at: http://cb2web.com/tests/geres04/indexppp.htm ... and it

Re: [WSG] Show/hide layers without javascript (was: [WSG] How to do some things)

2004-03-31 Thread Vaska . WSG
Thanks all, I guess the many explanations explain just why I've never done it with pure CSS before. I'll go back to my javascript and have a coke and a smile. ;) On 31 Mar 2004, at 07:28, scott parsons wrote: Well it depends upon the exact behaviour desired, and the browsers you want to sup

RE: [WSG] Layout 39% not 39%

2004-03-31 Thread Taco Fleur
Title: Message Hi Jeff,   I have no idea how that got in there, I must be overworked. Took it out on (another page I'm working on) and no difference though.      Hi Taco For starters you can’t have “,” within your statement i.e. it should be:   padding: 1

RE: [WSG] New Colour Schemer - draft - any suggestions?

2004-03-31 Thread theGrafixGuy
Mike, that looks a lot better! BTW I am running 1600x1200. Is it possible to add in an option for switching between a light or dark background or specifying a BG color - when you get into the off-whites, I can foresee a bit of a problem on the last column. (Just offering my input from a users PO

RE: [WSG] Layout 39% not 39%

2004-03-31 Thread Jeff - Accessibility 1st
Title: Message Hi Taco For starters you can’t have “,” within your statement i.e. it should be:   padding: 14px 0 0 0;   and I think you want the padding to be 9% from the left side is that correct?   Cheers   Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Ph: 02 9570 9875 Mobile: 0419 350 7

RE: [WSG] Layout 39% not 39%

2004-03-31 Thread Peter Firminger
Title: Message Hmmm,   Try putting it into standards compliant mode and it's different, but still not correct. Also putting the style into the head section will help... Really can't expect anything good to happen where it is.   Try margin-left: 9%;   See http://webboy.net/jobs/css/taco.htm   P

RE: [WSG] New Colour Schemer - draft - any suggestions?

2004-03-31 Thread Michael Kear
G'day Brian, I'm assuming you're using a narrower monitor than mine, or lower resolution so your screen real estate is less than mine. I've now laid it out differently so it's not so wide. Also I've added the italics and heading text for you.And now the tool will accept 3 digit abbreviated