First, thanks for the community support of standards. Too many
developers I know have not seen the "light", so to say, of standards. I
look forward to what I can both learn and share with you guys (
generic, includes females :D ).
Now, for my question:
I haven't spent a lot of time worrying abo
Looks fine in Mac Netscape 7.2 and Opera 7.54. Very small differences in Opera 6.03. The dashed underlines at bottom of page are black, not white, and the light grey bar on nav list at right only covers the type, not the whole bar. Really minor details.
Best regards,
Marilyn Langfeld
http://www.l
On 1/3/05 5:42 PM "Mani Sheriar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
> I have another request for a site check and, once again, Mac users are
> especially needed.
>
> Please see: http://www.manisheriar.com/globalrocket/indexNEW.htm
>
Superficially at least, looks fine on latest Safari. Same for
Hi All,
I have another request for a site check and, once again, Mac users are
especially needed.
Please see: http://www.manisheriar.com/globalrocket/indexNEW.htm
THANK YOU!
(And, yes, I realize it's a bit cheesy ... but you should have seen the
logo I was given to work with and "stay as close
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:16:47 +1100, russ - maxdesign
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looking to release by the end of the week. Please tear it apart,
> > particularly in the department of accesibility, as my target audience
> > is composed larely of older people, some with sight problems related
>
Thank you all for your prompt responses and information! I will check out
the previously submitted links, and weigh it against the input cited
below.
Very respectfully yours,
Mario S. Cisneros
> In regards to the links ppl have given you to the 'Multiple Internet
> Explorer versions' downloads,
Hi everyone.
You will probably get this message twice as I am cross posting to two lists to
make sure you all see it (in case some spam filtering loses the post from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and if you don't get the post with [WSG
Announce] in the subject please adjust your settings to receive it).
I
This is a one-way list for WSG Announcements
Hi everyone.
You will probably get this message twice as I am cross posting to two lists to
make sure you all see it (in case some spam filtering loses the post from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and if you don't get
> Looking to release by the end of the week. Please tear it apart,
> particularly in the department of accesibility, as my target audience
> is composed larely of older people, some with sight problems related
> to aging etc.
Have you checked the differences between your page background colours a
http://www.wooster.edu/ohiolightopera/NEW/
Looking to release by the end of the week. Please tear it apart,
particularly in the department of accesibility, as my target audience
is composed larely of older people, some with sight problems related
to aging etc.
Thanks much for any feedback you ca
I know, but it is amazing how many people browse at that still, and I
kinda like it... maybe I will lol
Bruce
The Bo$$ wrote:
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much
better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600.
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:49:45 -0500, B
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much
better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600.
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:49:45 -0500, Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The site is major better. Looks good, Loads fast, gives choice for
> movie, tells siz
In regards to the links ppl have given you to the 'Multiple Internet
Explorer versions' downloads, you should be aware of the potential
issues. There is no evidence either way that says this method is a true
representation of older versions of IE and all inherent issues with
Javascript, CSS, DOM,
The site is major better. Looks good, Loads fast, gives choice for
movie, tells size... nice. I use windows, Firefox with an 800x600
resolution and there is a scroll bar across the bottom which I can
almost get rid of using the very small text. Positives happening :-)
I am liking the group, ve
On 3 Jan 2005, at 22:38, Paul Connolley wrote:
Notwithstanding any bugs in the browsers, that is.
Which is the problem anyway. Specifying a list item element to have
display : block means that no glyph should be rendered and that it
should be just a box. Being overly explicit is for the benefit o
On 3 Jan 2005, at 21:53, Ted Drake wrote:
#rlcategories li {list-style:none !important; margin:0; padding:0;
display:block;}
Try using list-style-type : none as opposed to the shorthand property
which expects three values.
!important may, and should, not be necessary if you have used logical
and
Charles Martin wrote:
Try applying the list-item-style property to the UL element. I had
this problem before and it seems to prefer this option apply to the
whole list and not just a single LI element.
Whoa... where did I get *that* property name from? However, I did
notice that my references
I'm also fighting with a navigation problem, probably due to either inheritance or maybe doctype issues. I've also got a small problem with GoLive (which I use mostly for site management, doing CSS directly in source), which is adding two problematic lines per page. I've fixed them on the index pag
Ted Drake wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why the background bullets keep appearing on this
navigation bar?
Try applying the list-item-style property to the UL element. I had this
problem before and it seems to prefer this option apply to the whole
list and not just a single LI element.
***
I know many of you are running IE 5, and wondered if you had encountered
any problems running multiple versions?
Nope, because: http://www.skyzyx.com/archives/94.php ...
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
On Jan 3, 2005, at 8:43 AM, Lea de Groot wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:20:02 +0100, Roger Johansson wrote:
Safari? I use it all the time, 10-15 hours a day, and I can't
remember ever seeing a FOUC in Safari. Could it be that it only
happens in the very first versions? I didn't use Safari full time
>> page: http://www.bonusontwerp.nl/dijdel/etalage/bedrijfsreportage.html
Why not save yourself some code bloat, and use a rule such as:
div.thumbs img{width:36px; height:36px; border:0;}
and clear all of that out of your markup?
(such as )
That would help solve the problem of typos when doing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded IE version 5.0 from your Evolt's browser archive, and wanted
to ensure that initiating the setup wouldn't cause problems with my
current OS or browser configuration. I'm currently running Windows XP Home
Edition, and I recieve the following message when I launc
Hi All
Thanks for the help so far, but I'm still having problems.
http://v4.csatravelprotection.com/csa/linkview.do
I should explain the situation a little better, there are several unordered
lists on the page, a top right nav, a top main nav, and in the body of the
page, there is a navigatio
Hi,
Try this instead
http://www.skyzyx.com/downloads/?PHPSESSID=dcfd2d1aad122941eac9dca3b811e845
Kim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I hope this isn't OT, but I want to test my sites on various browsers and
versions to ensure their compliancy, which I'm assuming is standards
related. I currentl
ctrl+f5 ?
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting h
W3C CSS Validator Results for http://ckimedia.com/
No error or warning found
Congratulations!
Valid CSS!
This document validates as CSS!
...
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for h
Hi All,
I hope this isn't OT, but I want to test my sites on various browsers and
versions to ensure their compliancy, which I'm assuming is standards
related. I currently have IE 6.0, NN 7.0, FF 1.0 and Mozilla 1.6
I downloaded IE version 5.0 from your Evolt's browser archive, and wanted
to ensu
Jorg,
-change img-line1 and img-line4 in: height="36" width "36"
-css is ok
Beedog
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "BonusOntwerp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:06 PM
Subject: [WSG] Centering thumbnails
Happy new year everyone,
I'm having a hard ti
I didn't see it on another computer, but it keeps showing up on my screen. I've
hit shift-refresh. Perhaps it is just a bug on my box. Is there a better way to
refresh the css cache on IE?
Thanks
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Pringle,
> I've got this navigation list that looks fine in ff and opera
> but it suffers from a mystery inheritance problem in IE
> I'm using: list-style:none !important; and yet it continues
> to show a bullet in the boxes.
> http://v4.csatravelprotection.com/csa/linkview.do
>
> Does anyone have a sugg
I've got this navigation list that looks fine in ff and opera but it suffers
from a mystery inheritance problem in IE
I'm using: list-style:none !important; and yet it continues to show a bullet in
the boxes.
http://v4.csatravelprotection.com/csa/linkview.do
Does anyone have a suggestion?
thank
May want to give it another try.. I just did the validation through
Firefox and it reported no errors.
--
_
Charles Martin
http://www.webcudgel.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://websta
Ironically the problem was with a link to a web standards site.
On Monday, January 3, 2005, at 08:21 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Me Again:
The W3c CSS validator is giving me strange results. All was well
yesterday, but to today I'm instructed to validate the document, which
returns valid XHTML,
Me Again:
The W3c CSS validator is giving me strange results. All was well
yesterday, but to today I'm instructed to validate the document, which
returns valid XHTML, but the CSS validator reports an error:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://ckimedia.com/
index.php
CK
_
I'm running OSX 10.3 and have Safari 1.2.3 (though I mostly use Firefox now) and just took a look at the comedy site. No FUOC. But I distinctly remember seeing in on Wired News until maybe a year ago. Then it stopped. Don't know what changed, though.
Best regards,
Marilyn Langfeld
http://www.lang
Hi,
Hope this does not constitute noise. But thanks for all the
suggestions. The problems appear solved, even to some the dreaded QT.
Happy New Year to all.
C
On Monday, January 3, 2005, at 03:18 AM, Iain Gardiner wrote:
I was puzzled by the different link styling. I use FF 1, and when I
hove
On 3 Jan 2005, at 13:43, Lea de Groot wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:20:02 +0100, Roger Johansson wrote:
Safari? I use it all the time, 10-15 hours a day, and I can't
remember ever seeing a FOUC in Safari.[snip]
Hmmm, interesting - I'm running Panther, so I'm not running an early
version - 1.2.4 (v12
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:20:02 +0100, Roger Johansson wrote:
> Safari? I use it all the time, 10-15 hours a day, and I can't
> remember ever seeing a FOUC in Safari. Could it be that it only
> happens in the very first versions? I didn't use Safari full time
> until late 2003, when Mac OS X 10.3 an
Hi,
Interestingly I saw the FOUC for about a minute before the style appeared,
and it was a good thing, because the site was fully usable, so I read it
through
before any styles were applied :) I have mostly encountered this with
cssZenGarden (when the stylesheet is fetched from some far-far-away
On 3 jan 2005, at 14.02, Lea de Groot wrote:
Its called a FOUC - a flash of unstyled content.
Does this problem happen with other browsers?
From memory, it only happens in IE5.5 and Safari
(ok, that probably means it happens in Konquerer too...)
Safari? I use it all the time, 10-15 hours a day, and
Happy new year everyone,
I'm having a hard time centering images (horizontally and vertically).
In the right column there are 20 thumbnails with a maximum width or
height of 36 pixels. I want to center them horizontally and vertically.
The class "thumbs img" is like this:
.thumbs img { margin: 0
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:34:17 +1100, Ryan Sabir wrote:
> I'm often seeing the problem where the HTML loads before the CSS,
> leaving a second or so where you can see the raw structure of the site
> before it gets the stylesheet applied. For example:
Its called a FOUC - a flash of unstyled content.
Hi Ryan,
This is a common problem, (Flash of Unstyled Content) with plenty of cures.
Check this out:
http://www.bluerobot.com/web/css/fouc.asp
Prabhath Sirisena
www.vesess.com
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:34:17 +1100, Ryan Sabir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Its great that more and mor
It's called a Flash of Unstyled Content (FOUC)
See http://www.bluerobot.com/web/css/fouc.asp
(Found in Resources section of the Web Standards Group's site)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
Ryan Sabir wrote:
Hi all,
Its great that more and more people are fully laying out their sites using
CSS, but I'm often seeing the problem where the HTML loads before the CSS,
leaving a second or so where you can see the raw structure of the site
before it gets the stylesheet applied. For example:
Hi all,
Its great that more and more people are fully laying out their sites using
CSS, but I'm often seeing the problem where the HTML loads before the CSS,
leaving a second or so where you can see the raw structure of the site
before it gets the stylesheet applied. For example:
http://www.come
I was puzzled by the different link styling. I use FF 1, and when I hover
over the ALA link, the underline that appears causes some odd shifting in
the following links.
--
Iain Gardiner
http://www.firelightning.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI
I'm with you on this one Bob - I view the SitePoint, RSS feeds. It doesn't
matter how many times I "cancel" the pop-ups, every time I re-visit, I get
another! Now this is kind of understandable as I don't run my aggregater
24/7 but, as I've already purchased numerous SitePoint books, I do wish
they
Hello all,
- Original Message -
From: "russ - maxdesign" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Beware of Opening Links in a New Window
> http://www.sitepoint.com/article/beware-opening-links-new-window
>
When I looked at this link just now, I read the Neil Turner's piece about
why I shouldn't open a ne
50 matches
Mail list logo
